A residual level potential of mean force based approach to predict protein-protein interaction affinity

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6215 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 680-686

  Li, Xue Ling ^a   Hou, Mei Ling ^a,b   Wang, Shu Lin ^a,c  

^a INSTITUTE OF INTELLIGENT MACHINES   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^c HUNAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

affinity; mean force of potential; protein complex; Protein protein interaction; quaternary structure; residue level

Indexed keywords

AFFINITY; MEAN FORCES; PROTEIN COMPLEX; PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTION; QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; RESIDUE LEVEL;

BINDING ENERGY; BIOCHEMISTRY; COMPLEXATION; COMPUTATION THEORY; INTELLIGENT COMPUTING; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

PROTEINS;

EID: 77958461842     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14922-1_85     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Lu, H., Lu, L., Skolnick, J.: Development of unified statistical potentials describing protein-protein interactions. Biophysical Journal 84, 1895-1901 (2003)
2. Zhang, C., Liu, S., Zhu, Q. Q., Zhou, Y. Q.: A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 48, 2325-2335 (2005)
3. Kollman, P. A., Massova, I., Reyes, C., Kuhn, B., Huo, S., Chong, L., Lee, M., Lee, T., Duan, Y., Wang, W., Donini, O., Cieplak, P., Srinivasan, J., Case, D. A., Cheatham, T. E.: 3rd: Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. Acc. Chem. Res. 33, 889-897 (2000)
4. Bohm, H. J.: Prediction of binding constants of protein ligands: a fast method for the prioritization of hits obtained from de novo design or 3D database search programs. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 12, 309-323 (1998)
5. Muegge, I.: PMF scoring revisited. J. Med. Chem. 49, 5895-5902 (2006)
6. Englebienne, P., Moitessier, N.: Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules. 4. Are Popular Scoring Functions Accurate for this Class of Proteins? Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 49, 1568-1580 (2009)
7. Oda, A., Tsuchida, K., Takakura, T., Yamaotsu, N., Hirono, S.: Comparison of consensus scoring strategies for evaluating computational models of protein-ligand complexes. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 46, 380-391 (2006)
8. Su, Y., Zhou, A., Xia, X. F., Li, W., Sun, Z. R.: Quantitative prediction of protein-protein binding affinity with a potential of mean force considering volume correction. Protein Science 18, 2550-2558 (2009)
9. Sotriffer, C. A., Sanschagrin, P., Matter, H., Klebe, G.: SFCscore: Scoring functions for affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes. Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics 73, 395-419 (2008)
10. Skolnick, J., Kolinski, A., Ortiz, A.: Derivation of protein-specific pair potentials based on weak sequence fragment similarity. Proteins-Structure Function and Genetics 38, 3-16 (2000)
11. Wunderlich, Z., Mirny, L. A.: Using genome-wide measurements for computational prediction of SH2-peptide interactions. Nucleic Acids Research 37, 4629-4641 (2009)