Response-repetition effects in task switching with and without response execution

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 135, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 302-309

  Schuch, Stefanie ^a   Koch, Iring ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Response execution; Response inhibition; Response repetition; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 77958154574     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.016     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 2001, 108:624-652.
2. Druey M.D., Hübner R. Response inhibition under task switching: its strength depends on the amount of task-irrelevant response activation. Psychological Research 2008, 72:515-527.
3. Holroyd C.B., Coles M.G.H. The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review 2002, 109:679-709.
4. Holroyd C.B., Yeung N., Coles M.G.H., Cohen J.D. A mechanism for error detection in speeded response time tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2005, 134:163-191.
5. Houghton G., Tipper S.P. A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. Inhibitory Processes of Attention, Memory and Language 1994, 53-112. Academic Press, Florida. D. Dagenbach, T. Carr (Eds.).
6. Hübner R., Druey M.D. Response execution, selection, or activation: what is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?. Psychological Research 2006, 70:245-261.
7. Hübner R., Druey M.D. Multiple response codes play specific roles in response selection and inhibition under task switching. Psychological Research 2008, 72:415-424.
8. Jessup R.K., Busemeyer J.R., Brown J.W. Error effects in anterior cingulate cortex reverse when error likelihood is high. The Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:3467-3472.
9. Kleinsorge T., Heuer H. Hierarchical switching in a multi-dimensional task space. Psychological Research 1999, 62:300-312.
10. Koch I., Gade M., Schuch S., Philipp A.M. The role of inhibition in task switching - A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2010, 17:1-14.
11. Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psycho-acoustics. The Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 1970, 49:467-477.
12. Li K.Z.H., Lindenberger U., Rünger D., Frensch P.A. The role of inhibition in the regulation of sequential action. Psychological Science 2000, 11:343-347.
13. Lien M.-C., Proctor R.W. Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:1260-1280.
14. Lien M.-C., Schweickert R., Proctor R.W. Task switching and response correspondence in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:692-712.
15. Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users' guide to the stop-signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 214-249). San Diego: Academic Press.
16. Logan G.D., Burkell J. Dependence and independence in responding to double stimulation: a comparison of stop, change, and dual-task paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 1986, 12:549-563.
17. Logan G.D., Gordon R.D. Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review 2001, 108:393-434.
18. MacKay D.G. Self-inhibition and the disruptive effects of internal and external feedback in skilled behavior. Generation and modulation of action patterns 1986, 174-186. Springer, London. H. Heuer, C. Fromm (Eds.).
19. MacKay D.G. The organization of perception and action 1987, Springer, New York.
20. Meiran N. Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research 2000, 63:234-249.
21. Miltner W.H.R., Braun C.H., Coles M.G.H. Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a "generic" neural system for error detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1997, 9:788-798.
22. Monsell S. Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:134-140.
23. Notebaert W., Houtman F., Van Opstal F., Gevers W., Fias W., Verguts T. Post-error slowing: an orienting account. Cognition 2009, 111:275-279.
24. Osman A., Kornblum S., Meyer D.E. The point of no return in choice reaction time: controlled and ballistic stages of response preparation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 1986, 12:243-258.
25. Rabbitt P.M.A. Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1966, 71:264-272.
26. Rabbitt P.M.A., Rodgers B. What does a man do after he makes an error? An analysis of response programming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1977, 29:727-743.
27. Rieger M., Gauggel S. Inhibitory after-effects in the stop-signal paradigm. British Journal of Psychology 1999, 90:509-518.
28. Rogers R.D., Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1995, 124:207-231.
29. Schachar R.J., Chen S., Logan G.D., Ornstein T., Crosbie J., Ickowicz A., et al. Evidence for an error monitoring deficit in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 2004, 32:285-293.
30. Schuch S., Koch I. The costs of changing the representation of action: response repetition and response-response compatibility in dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 2004, 30:566-582.
31. Schuch S., Koch I. Task switching and action sequencing. Psychological Research 2006, 70:526-540.
32. Schuch S., Tipper S.P. On observing another person's actions: influences of observed inhibition and errors. Perception & Psychophysics 2007, 69:828-837.
33. Steinhauser M. How to correct a task error: Task-switch effects following different types of error correction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:1028-1035.
34. Steinhauser M., Hübner R. Response-based strengthening in task-shifting: evidence from shift effects produced by errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:517-534.
35. Steinhauser M., Hübner R., Druey M. Adaptive control of response preparedness in task switching. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1826-1835.
36. Van Boxtel G.J.M., van der Molen M.W., Jennings J.R. Differential involvement of the anterior cingulate cortex in performance monitoring during a stop-signal task. Journal of Psychophysiology 2005, 19:1-10.
37. Verbruggen F., Liefooghe B., Szmalec A., Vandierendonck A. Inhibiting responses when switching: does it matter?. Experimental Psychology 2005, 52:125-130.
38. Verbruggen F., Liefooghe B., Vandierendonck A. Selective stopping in task switching: the role of response selection and response execution. Experimental Psychology 2006, 53:48-57.
39. Verbruggen F., Logan G.D., Liefooghe B., Vandierendonck A. Short-term aftereffects of response inhibition: repetition priming or between-trial control adjustments?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:413-426.
40. Yeung N., Botvinick M.M., Cohen J.D. The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review 2004, 111:931-959.