A 2D electrical resistivity tomography survey of a vineyard plot of the gaillac appellation (france): Interpretation with respect to possible implications on vine water supply

Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 51-60

  Courjault Rade P ^a   Llubes, M ^b   Darrozes, J ^a   Munoz, M ^a   Maire, E ^a   Hirissou, N ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^b LEGOS   (France)

^c Laboratoire de Geographie de l'Environnement ^*  (France)

Author keywords

Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT); Fer Servadou; Gaillac appellation; Geology; Gravesac; Pedology; Syrah; Vineyard; Water supply

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958034534     PISSN: 11510285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.20870/oeno-one.2010.44.2.1462     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. AALTONEN J., 2001. Seasonal resisitivity variations in some different swedisch soils. Eur. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys., 6, 33-45.
2. ACEVEDO-OPAZO C, TISSEYRE B., GUILLAUME S. and OJEDA H., 2008. The potential of high spatial resolution information to define within-vineyard zones related to vine water status, Precision Agriculture, 9,285-302.
3. ALVES R, ALMEIDA R, PEREIRA M., MAGALHAES N. and ARANHA J., 2006. Monitoring water deficit in vineyards by means of Red and Infrared measurements. Vlth International Terroir Congress, Enita Ed., Bordeaux, p. 280-284.
4. ANGLADE I. and DELAUNOIS A., 1991. Étude bioclimatique du vignoble gaillacois- Télédétection - Météorologie (température et aérologie) - Stades phéiologiques. Rapport, Chambre d'Agriculture du Tarn, 79 p.
5. ARCHER E. and STRAUSS H. C., 1989. The effect of plant spacing on the water status of soil and grapevines. S. Afr. J. EnoLVitic, 10,49-58.
6. ATTIA F., 2007. Effet du stress hydrique sur le comportement écophysiologique et la maturité phénolique de la vigne Vitis vinifera L.: étude de cinq cépages autochtones de Midi-Pyrenees. Thèse INPT, Toulouse, 194 pp.
7. BENDERITTER Y. and SCHOTT J.J, 1999. Shot time variation of the in an unsaturated soil: the relationship with rainfall. Eur. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys., 4,37-49.
8. BESSON A, COUSIN I., SAMOUELIAN A., BOIZARD H., RICHARD G, 2004. Structural heterogeneity of the soil tilled layer as characterized by 2D electrical resistivity surveying. Soil Tillage Res., 79,239-249.
9. BINLEY A, CASSIANIG, MIDDELTON R., WINSHIP P., 2002 Vadose zone flow model parameterisation using cross-borehole radar and resistivity imaging. J. Hydrol, 1,51-58.
10. BOCOCK K.L., BAILEY A.D. and HORNUNG M, 1982. Variation in soil temperature with microrelief and soil depth in a newly planted forest. Eur. Joum. Soil Sci., 33,155-62.
11. BODIN R and MORLAT R, 2006. Charcaterization of viticultural terroirs using a simple field model based on soil depth-1. Validation of the water supply regime, phenology and vinevigour, in the Anjoiu vineyard (France). Plant and Soil, 281, 37-54.
12. BOUTRAUD J.C., BORNAND M. and SERVAT E., 1984. Mesures de résistivité et etude du comportement agronomique d'un sol. Sci. Sol, 4,295-308.
13. CAMPBELL R.B., BOWER C.A. and RICHARDS L.A., 1948. Change of electrical conductivity with temperature and the relation of osmotic pressure to electrical conductivity and ion concentration for soil extracts. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc, 13,66-69.
14. CAVAILLE A., 1973. Carte géologique détaillée de la France au 1/5 000. Feuille de Gaillac. Ed. Bureau Recherches Géologiques et Minières, Orléans.
15. CELETTE F., GAUDIN R. and GARY C, 2008. Spatial and temporal changes to the water regime of a Mediterranean vineyard due to the adoption of cover cropping. Eur. J. Agr., doi:10.10167j.eja.
16. COURJAULT-RADÉ P., MUNOZ P and HIRISSOU N., 2005. Caractérisation de la composante geologique de parcelles du vignoble de Gaillac (Tarn, Midi-Pyréneés) - Incidences sur la determination des unités terroir de base et sur le choix du materiel végétal. J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin, 39,95-107.
17. CREASY G.L. and LOMBARD P.B., 1993. Vine water stress and peduncle girdling effects on pre and post-veraison grape berry growth and deformability. Am. J. Enoi, Viticult., 44,193-197.
18. DAILY W., RAMIREZ A.., LEBRECQUE D. and NITAO J., 1992. Electrical resistivity tomography of vadose water movement. Water Res. Reseach, 28,1429-1442.
19. EDWARDS L.S., 1977. A modified pseudo section for resistivity and IP. Geophysics, 66,78-89.
20. GOULET E., MORLAT R., RIOUX D. and CESBRON S., 2004. A calculation method of available soil water content: application to viticultural terroirs mapping of the Loire valley. J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin, 38,231-235.
21. GOULET E. and BARBEAU G., 2006. Apports des mesures de résistivité electrique du sol dans les etudes sur le fonctionnement hydrique du systeme sol/vigne. J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin, 40,2,57-69
22. GRIFFITHS DH and BARKER R.J., 1993. Two-dimensional resistivity imaging and modeling in areas of complex geology. J. Appl. Geophys., 29,211-226.
23. HAYNES S J., 1999. Geology and wine. Geosci. Canada, 26,189-194.
24. INFOCLIMAT 2009. Données archivées: donnees des stations météo. Available on http://www.infocIimat.fr.
25. INTRIGLIOLO D.S. and CASTEL J.R, 2009. Response of Vitis vinifera cv. Tempranillo to partial root zone drying in the field: water relations, growth, yield and fruit wine quality. Agr. Water Manag., 282-292.
26. JACKSON R.S., 2008. Wine science - Principles and applications. Academic Press, Elsevier, 3rd Ed., 725 p.
27. KEAREY P., BROOKS M. and HILL I., 2002. An introduction to geophysical exploration. Blackwell Science. Cambridge.
28. KELLER G.V. and FRISCHKNECHT F.C., 1966. Electrical methods in geophysical prospecting. Pergamon, Oxford.
29. LAMB, D.W., BRAMLEY, R.G. V. and HALL A., 2004. Precision viticulture- An Australian perspective. Acta Hort., 640, 15-25.
30. LAVIGNAC G., 2001. Cépages du Sud-Ouest - 2000 ans dliistoire. Ed. du Rouergue / INRA Editions, 272 pp.
31. LOKE MH., 1997. Res2Dinv software user's manual, 1997.
32. LOKE M.H., 2001. Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys. Course notes for USGS Workshop 2-D and 3-D inversion and modelling of surface and borehole resistivity data;Torrs,CT.
33. LOKE M.H. and BARBER R.D., 1996. Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections using a quasi-Newton method. Geophys. Prosp., 44,131-152.
34. MICHOT D, BENDERITTERR Y., DORIGNY A., NICOULLAUD B., KING D. and TABBAGH A., 2003. Spatial and temporal and monitoring of soil water content with an irrigated corn crop cover using surface electrical resistivity tomography. Water Res. Research, 39,1138-1150.
35. MORAIS R., FERNANDES M.A., MATOS S.G., SERÔDIO C, FERREIRA P.J.S.G. and REIS M.J.C.S., 2007. A ZigBee multi-powered wireless acquisition device for remote sensing applications in precision viticulture. Comp. Electr. Agric, 62,94-106.
36. MORARIF., CASTRIGNANO A. and PAGLIARIN C, 2009. Application on multivariate geostatistics in delineating management zones within a gravely vineyard using geo-letrical sensors. Comp. Electr. Agric, doi: 10.1016.
37. MORLAT R., 2001. Terroirs viticoles: etude et valorisation. Ed.Oenoplurimedia.
38. MORLAT R. and JACQUET A., 2003. Grapevine root system and soil characteristics in a vineyard maintained long-term with or without interrow sward. Am. J. Enol. Vitic, 54, 1-7.
39. MORLAT R., PENAVAYRE M., JACQUET A., ASSELIN C. and LEMAITRE C, 1992. Influence des terroirs sur le fonctionnement hydrique et la photosynthese de la vigne en miliesime exceptionnellement sec (1990). Consequence sur la maturation du raisin. J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin, 26,197-220.
40. OJEDA H, KRAEVA E, DELOIRE A., CARBONNEAU A., and ANDARY C, 2002. Influence of pre and post-veraison water deficits on synthesis and concentration of skins phenolic compounds during berry growth of Vitis vinifera cv. Shiraz. Am. J. Enol. Vitic, 53,261-267.
41. PALACKY, G.J., 1987. Resistivity characteristics of geologic targets. In «Nabighian, M.N., ed., Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics theory«: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 1,53-129.
42. PANISSOD C, MICHOT D., BENDERITTER Y. and TABBAGH A., 2001. On the effectiveness of 2D electrical inversion results: An agricultural case study. Geoph. Prosp., 49,570-576.
43. PELLEGRINO A., LEBON E, M. VOLTZ A. and WERY J., 2004. Relationships between plant and soil water status in vine {Vitis vinifera L). Plant and Soil, 266,129-142.
44. POMEROL C. 1990. Terroirs et vins de France. ltineraires cenologiques et geologiques. Éd. du BRGM, Orléans.
45. REIN A., HOFFMANN R. and DIETRICH P., 2004. Influence of natural time-dependent on DC resistivity measurements. J. Hydrology, 285,215-242.
46. SAMOUELIAN A., COUSIN I., TABBAGH A., BRUAND A. and RICHARD G., 2005. Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: a review. Soil and Tillage Res., 83,173-193.
47. SHAFFER R., SAMPAIO T.L., PINCKERTON J. and VASCONCELOS M.L., 2004. Grapevine rootstocks for Oregon vineyards. Oregon state university, EM 8882, 11pp.
48. SHULTZ, H.R., 2003. Differences in hydraulic architecture account for near-isohydric and anisohydric behaviour of two field-grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during drought. Plant, Cell and Environment, 26,1393-1405.
49. STOLL M. and JONES H.G., 2007. Thermal imaging as a viable tool for monitoring plant stress. Intern. J. Vine Wine Res., 41,77-84.
50. TABBAGH A, BENDERITTER D., MICHOT D. and PANISSOD C, 2002. Measurement of variations in soil electrical resistivity assessing the volume affected by plant water uptake. Eur. J. Environn. Eng. Geophys., 7, 229-237.
51. TARDIEU F and SIMONNEAU T., 1998. Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. J. Exp. Bot., 49,419-432.
52. QUEBEDEAUX B., 2008. Simulation of the effects of limited water on photosynthesis and transpiration in field crops: Can we advance our modeling approaches ? In "Response of crops to limited water- Undesrtanding and modelling water stress effects on plant growth process" Ahuja L.R., Reddy V.R., SaseendranS.A. and Yu Q Editors. American Society of Agronomy, 105-145.
53. TISSEYRE B., J. TAYLOR J. and OJEDA H., 2007. New technologies and methodologies for site-specific viticulture. Int. J. Vine Wine Res., 41,63-76.
54. VAN LÉEUWEN C, TREGOAT O., CHONÉ X., BOIS B., PERNET D. and GAUDILL̀ERE J.-P., 2009. Vine water status is a key factor in grape ripening and vintage quality for red Bordeaux wine. How can it be assessed for vineyard management purposes? J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin, 43, no 3, 121-134.
55. VAN LEEUWEN C. and SEGUIN G, 2006. The concept of terroir in viticulture. J. Wine Res. 17,1-10.
56. VAN LEEUWEN C, FRIANT P., CHONE X. and TREGOAT O., 2004. Influence of climate, soil, and cultivar on terroir. Am. J. Enol. Vitic, 55,207-217.
57. VOUILLAMOZ J. F. and GRANDO M. S., 2006. Genealogy of wine grape cultivars: « Pinot » is related to « Syrah ». Heredity, 97,102-110.
58. WHEELER S.J. and PICKERING G.J, 2003. Optimizing grape quality through soil management practices. Food, Agr. Em., 1,190-197.
59. ZHOU Q.Y, SHIMADA J. and SATO A., 2001. Three-dimensional spatial and temporal monitoing of soil water contant using electrical resistivity tomography. Water Res. Research., 37,273-285