Immortalized, premalignant epithelial cell populations contain long-lived, label-retaining cells that asymmetrically divide and retain their template DNA

Breast Cancer Research

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2010, Pages

  Bussard, Karen M ^a   Boulanger, Corinne A ^a   Kittrell, Frances S ^b   Behbod, Fariba ^c   Medina, Daniel ^b   Smith, Gilbert H ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BROXURIDINE; DNA; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR ALPHA; PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR; THYMIDINE; TRITIUM;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUTORADIOGRAPHY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EPITHELIUM; CELL CYCLE; CELL DIVISION; CELL IMMORTALIZATION; CELL LABELING; DNA REPLICATION; EPITHELIUM CELL; FLOW CYTOMETRY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MAMMARY GLAND; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRECANCER; PREGNANCY; ANIMAL; ASYMMETRIC CELL DIVISION; BAGG ALBINO MOUSE; BIOSYNTHESIS; CYTOLOGY; DNA TEMPLATE; FEMALE; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; STEM CELL; UDDER;

ANIMALS; ASYMMETRIC CELL DIVISION; AUTORADIOGRAPHY; BROMODEOXYURIDINE; DNA; DNA REPLICATION; EPITHELIAL CELLS; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR ALPHA; FEMALE; MAMMARY GLANDS, ANIMAL; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; PREGNANCY; RECEPTORS, PROGESTERONE; STEM CELLS; TEMPLATES, GENETIC; THYMIDINE; TRITIUM;

EID: 77958028939     PISSN: 14655411     EISSN: 1465542X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/bcr2754     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Cairns J. Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer. Nature 1975, 255:197-200. 10.1038/255197a0, 1143315.
2. Merok JR, Lansita JA, Tunstead JR, Sherley JL. Cosegregation of chromosomes containing immortal DNA strands in cells that cycle with asymmetric stem cell kinetics. Cancer Res 2002, 62:6791-6795.
3. Rambhatla L, Ram-Mohan S, Cheng JJ, Sherley JL. Immortal DNA strand cosegregation requires p53/IMPDH-dependent asymmetric self-renewal associated with adult stem cells. Cancer Res 2005, 65:3155-3161.
4. Karpowicz P, Morshead C, Kam A, Jervis E, Ramunas J, Cheng V, van der Kooy D. Support for the immortal strand hypothesis: neural stem cells partition DNA asymmetrically in vitro. J Cell Biol 2005, 170:721-732. 10.1083/jcb.200502073, 2171352, 16115957.
5. Potten CS, Owen G, Booth D. Intestinal stem cells protect their genome by selective segregation of template DNA strands. J Cell Sci 2002, 115:2381-2388.
6. Smith GH. Label-retaining epithelial cells in mouse mammary gland divide asymmetrically and retain their template DNA strands. Development 2005, 132:681-687. 10.1242/dev.01609, 15647322.
7. Ferguson DJP, Anderson TJ. Morphological evaluation of cell turnover in relation to the menstrual cycle in the 'resting' human breast. Br J Cancer 1981, 44:177-181. 2010743, 7272186.
8. Ferguson DJP, Anderson TJ. Ultrastructural observations on cell death by apoptosis in the 'resting' human breast. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol 1981, 393:193-203. 10.1007/BF00431076, 7292979.
9. Zeps N, Dawkins HJS, Papadimitriou JM, Redmond SL, Walters M-NI. Detection of a population of long-lived cells in mammary epithelium of the mouse. Cell Tissue Res 1996, 286:525-536. 10.1007/s004410050722, 8929355.
10. Booth BW, Boulanger CA, Smith GH. Selective segregation of DNA strands persists in long label retaining mammary cells during pregnancy. Breast Cancer Res 2008, 10:R90. 10.1186/bcr2188, 2614527, 18950502.
11. Cairns J. Somatic stem cells and the kinetics of mutagenesis and carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99:10567-10570. 10.1073/pnas.162369899, 124976, 12149477.
12. Potten CS, Hume WJ, Reid P, Cairns J. The segregation of DNA in epithelial stem cells. Cell 1978, 15:899-906. 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90274-X, 728994.
13. Shinin V, Gayraud-Morel B, Gomes D, Tajbakhsh S. Asymmetric division and cosegregation of template DNA strands in adult muscle satellite cells. Nat Cell Biol 2006, 8:677-687. 10.1038/ncb1425, 16799552.
14. Kordon EC, Smith GH. An entire functional mammary gland may comprise the progeny from a single cell. Development 1998, 125:1921-1930.
15. Smith GH, Boulanger CA. Mammary stem cell repertoire: new insights in aging epithelial populations. Mech Ageing Dev 2002, 123:1505-1519. 10.1016/S0047-6374(02)00114-8, 12425957.
16. Callahan R, Smith GH. Common integration sites for MMTV in viral induced mouse mammary tumors. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2008, 13:309-321. 10.1007/s10911-008-9092-6, 18709449.
17. Danielson KG, Oborn CJ, Durban EM, Butel JS, Medina D. Epithelial mouse mammary cell line exhibiting normal morphogenesis in vivo and functional differentiation in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984, 81:3756-3760. 10.1073/pnas.81.12.3756, 345298, 6587390.
18. Smith GH. Experimental mammary epithelial morphogenesis in an in vivo model: evidence for distinct cellular progenitors of the ductal and lobular phenotype. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1996, 39:21-31. 10.1007/BF01806075, 8738603.
19. Smith GH, Vonderhaar BK, Graham DE, Medina D. Expression of pregnancy-specific genes in preneoplastic mouse mammary tissues from virgin mice. Cancer Res 1984, 44:3426-3437.
20. Smith GH, Gallahan D, Zwiebel JA, Freeman SM, Bassin RH, Callahan R. Long-term in vivo expression of genes introduced by retrovirus-mediated transfer into mammary epithelial cells. J Virol 1991, 65:6365-6370. 250361, 1656102.
21. Traurig HH. A radioautographic study of cell proliferation in the mammary gland of the pregnant mouse. Anat Rec 1967, 159:239-247. 10.1002/ar.1091590213, 6082276.
22. Boulanger CA, Wagner KU, Smith GH. Parity-induced mouse mammary epithelial cells are pluripotent, self-renewing and sensitive to TGF-beta1 expression. Oncogene 2005, 24:552-560. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208185, 15580303.
23. Brito IL, Yu HG, Amon A. Condensins promote co-orientation of sister chromatids during meiosis I in budding yeast. Genetics 2010, 2870976, 20194961.
24. Falconer E, Chavez EA, Henderson A, Poon SS, McKinney S, Brown L, Huntsman DG, Lansdorp PM. Identification of sister chromatids by DNA template strand sequences. Nature 2010, 463:93-97. 10.1038/nature08644, 20016487.
25. Armakolas A, Klar AJK. Cell type regulates selective segregation of mouse chromosome 7 DNA strands in mitosis. Science 2006, 311:1146-1149. 10.1126/science.1120519, 16497932.
26. Conboy MJ, Karasov AO, Rando TA. High incidence of non-random template strand segregatoin and asymmetric fate determination in dividing stem cells and their progeny. PLoS Biol 2007, 5:e102. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050102, 1852584, 17439301.