Effects of barrier perches and density on broiler leg health, fear, and performance

Poultry Science

Volumn 89, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1574-1583

  Ventura, B A ^a   Siewerdt, F ^a   Estevez, I ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b NEIKER and a Vaccine producing Commercial Company CZVSL   (Spain)

Author keywords

Barrier perch; Broiler chicken; Enrichment; Footpad dermatitis; Welfare

Indexed keywords

AVES; GALLUS GALLUS;

EID: 77958020885     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: 15253171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3382/ps.2009-00576     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Appleby, M. C., S. F. Smith, and B. O. Hughes. 1992. Individual perching behavior of laying hens and its effects in cages. Br. Poult. Sci. 33: 227-238.
2. Arnould, C., and J. M. Faure. 2004. Use of pen space and activity of broiler chickens reared at two different densities. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 87: 155-170.
3. Berg, C. C. 1998. Foot-pad dermatitis in broilers and turkeys- Prevalence, risk factors and prevention. PhD Diss. Swedish Univ. Agric. Sci., Uppsala, Sweden.
4. Bizeray, D., I. Estevez, C. Leterrier, and J. M. Faure. 2002a. Effects of increasing environmental complexity on the physical activity of broiler chickens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 79: 27-41.
5. Bizeray, D., I. Estevez, C. Leterrier, and J. M. Faure. 2002b. Influence of increased environmental complexity on leg condition, performance, and level of fearfulness in broilers. Poult. Sci. 81: 767-773.
6. Bizeray, D., C. Leterrier, P. Constantin, M. Picard, and J. M. Faure. 2000. Early locomotor behaviour in genetic stocks of chickens with different growth rates. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 68: 231-242.
7. Blatchford, R. A., K. C. Klasing, H. L. Shivaprasad, P. S. Wakenell, G. S. Archer, and J. A. Mench. 2009. The effect of light intensity on the behavior, eye and leg health, and immune function of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 88: 20-28.
8. Brake, J., T. P. Keeley, and R. B. Jones. 1994. Effect of age and presence of perches during rearing on tonic immobility fear reactions of broiler breeder pullets. Poult. Sci. 73: 1470-1474.
9. Calvet, S., H. Van den Weghe, R. Kosch, and F. Estellés. 2009. The influence of the lighting program on broiler activity and dust production. Poult. Sci. 88: 2504-2511.
10. Cornetto, T., and I. Estevez. 2001. Behavior of the domestic fowl in the presence of vertical panels. Poult. Sci. 80: 1455-1462.
11. Cravener, T. L., W. B. Roush, and M. M. Mashaly. 1992. Broiler production under varying population densities. Poult. Sci. 71: 427-433.
12. Dawkins, M. S., C. A. Donnelly, and T. A. Jones. 2004. Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature 427: 342-344.
13. Dozier, W. A., III, J. P. Thaxton, S. L. Branton, G. W. Morgan, D. M. Miles, W. B. Roush, B. D. Lott, and Y. Vizzier-Thaxton. 2005. Stocking density effects on growth performance and processing yields of heavy broilers. Poult. Sci. 84: 1332-1338.
14. Dozier, W. A., III, J. P. Thaxton, J. L. Purswell, H. A. Olanrewaju, S. L. Branton, and W. B. Roush. 2006. Stocking density effects on male broilers grown to 1.8 kilograms of body weight. Poult. Sci. 85: 344-351.
15. Estevez, I. 2007. Density allowances for broilers: Where to set the limits? Poult. Sci. 86: 1265-1272.
16. Forkman, B., A. Boissy, M. C. Meunier-Salaün, E. Canali, and R. B. Jones. 2007. A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses. Physiol. Behav. 92: 340-374.
17. Greene, J. A., R. M. McCracken, and R. T. Evans. 1985. A contact dermatitis of broilers-Clinical and pathological findings. Avian Pathol. 14: 23-38.
18. Haslam, S. M., S. N. Brown, L. J. Wilkins, S. C. Kestin, P. D. Warriss, and C. J. Nicol. 2006. Preliminary study to examine the utility of using foot burn or hock burn to assess aspects of housing conditions for broiler chicken. Br. Poult. Sci. 47: 13-18.
19. Haslam, S. M., T. G. Knowles, S. N. Brown, L. J. Wilkins, S. C. Kestin, P. D. Warriss, and C. J. Nicol. 2007. Factors affecting the prevalence of foot pad dermatitis, hock burn and breast burn in broiler chicken. Br. Poult. Sci. 48: 264-275.
20. Heckert, R. A., I. Estevez, E. Russek-Cohen, and R. Pettit-Riley. 2002. Effects of density and perch availability on the immune status of broilers. Poult. Sci. 81: 451-457.
21. Hughes, B. O., and H. A. Elson. 1977. The use of perches by broilers in floor pens. Br. Poult. Sci. 18: 715-722.
22. Jones, R. B. 1986. The tonic immobility reaction of the domestic fowl: A review. World's Poult. Sci. J. 42: 82-96.
23. Jones, R. B. 1996. Fear and adaptability in poultry: Insights, implications and imperatives. World's Poult. Sci. J. 52: 131-174. (Abstr.)
24. Jones, R. B., and D. Waddington. 1992. Modification of fear in domestic chicks, Gallus gallus domesticus, via regular handling and early environmental enrichment. Anim. Behav. 43: 1021-1033.
25. Kestin, S. C., T. G. Knowles, A. E. Tinch, and N. G. Gregory. 1992. Prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chickens and its relationship with genotype. Vet. Rec. 131: 190-194.
26. Kjaer, J. B., G. Su, B. L. Nielsen, and P. Sørensen. 2006. Foot pad dermatitis and hock burn in broiler chickens and degree of inheritance. Poult. Sci. 85: 1342-1348.
27. Knierim, U., S. Van Dongen, B. Forkman, F. A. M. Tuyttens, M. Spinka, J. L. Campo, and G. E. Weissengruber. 2007. Fluctuating asymmetry as an animal welfare indicator-A review of methodology and validity. Physiol. Behav. 92: 398-421.
28. Koene, P., S. V. Ruiten, and E. Bokkers. 1999. The effect of increasing broiler behaviour possibilities by giving extra furniture and a slimmer body: The effects of perches and feed restriction. In Proc. 33rd Int. Congr. Int. Soc. Appl. Ethol., Lillehammer, Norway. K. E. Boe, M. Bakken, and B. O. Braastad, ed. Agric. Univ. Norway, Aas.
29. Krause, E. T., M. Naguid, F. Trillmich, and L. Schrader. 2006. The effects of short term enrichment on learning in chickens from a laying strain (Gallus gallus domesticus). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 101: 318-327.
30. Le Van, N. F., I. Estevez, and W. R. Stricklin. 2000. Use of horizontal and angled perches by broiler chickens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 65: 349-365.
31. Lynch, M., B. H. Thorp, and C. C. Whitehead. 1992. Avian tibial dyschondroplasia as a cause of bone deformity. Avian Pathol. 21: 275-285.
32. Marin, R. H., P. Freytes, D. Guzman, and R. B. Jones. 2001. Effects of an acute stressor on fear and on the social reinstatement responses of domestic chicks to cagemates and strangers. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 71: 57-66.
33. Martland, M. F. 1985. Ulcerative dermatitis in broiler chickens- The effects of wet litter. Avian Pathol. 14: 353-364.
34. Mills, A. D., and J. M. Faure. 1991. Divergent selection for duration of tonic immobility and social reinstatement behavior in Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) chicks. J. Comp. Psychol. 105: 25-38.
35. Møller, A. P. 1999. Asymmetry as a predictor of growth, fecundity and survival. Ecol. Lett. 2: 149-156.
36. Møller, A. P., G. S. Sanotra, and K. S. Vestergaard. 1999. Developmental instability and light regimen in chickens (Gallus gallus). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 62: 57-71.
37. NASS. 2002. U.S. Broiler Industry Structure. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/nass/industry-structure/specpo02.pdf Accessed Dec. 2007.
38. Newberry, R. C. 1995. Environmental enrichment-Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 44: 229-243.
39. Newberry, R. C., I. Estevez, and L. J. Keeling. 2001. Group size and perching behaviour in young domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 73: 117-129.
40. Newberry, R. C., J. R. Hunt, and E. E. Gardiner. 1985. Effect of alternating lights and strain on behavior and leg disorders of roaster chickens. Poult. Sci. 64: 1863-1868.
41. Pagazaurtundua, A., and P. D. Warriss. 2006. Measurements of footpad dermatitis in broiler chickens at processing plants. Vet. Rec. 158: 679-682.
42. Palmer, A. R., and C. Strobeck. 1986. Fluctuating asymmetry: Measurement, analysis, patterns. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 391-421.
43. Pettit-Riley, R., and I. Estevez. 2001. Effects of density on perching behavior of broiler chickens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 71: 127-140.
44. Pettit-Riley, R., I. Estevez, and E. Russek-Cohen. 2002. Effects of crowding and access to perches on aggressive behaviour in broilers. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 79: 11-25.
45. Proudfoot, F. G., H. W. Hulan, and D. R. Ramey. 1979. Effect of 4 stocking densities on broiler carcass grade, the incidence of breast blisters, and other performance traits. Poult. Sci. 58: 791-793.
46. Reiter, K., and W. Bessei. 1998a. Effect of locomotor activity on bone development and leg disorders in broilers. Arch. Geflugelkd. 62: 247-253. (Abstr.)
47. Reiter, K., and W. Bessei. 1998b. Possibilities to reduce leg disorders in broilers and turkeys. Arch. Geflugelkd. 62: 145-149. (Review) (Abstr.)
48. Sandusky, C. L., and J. L. Heath. 1988. Effect of age, sex, and barriers in experimental pens on muscle growth. Poult. Sci. 67: 1708-1716.
49. Sanotra, G. S., J. D. Lund, A. K. Ersboll, J. S. Petersen, and K. Vestergaard. 2001. Monitoring leg problems in broilers: A survey of commercial broiler production in Denmark. World's Poult. Sci. J. 57: 55-69. (Abstr.)
50. SAS. 2003. SAS Version 9.1.3. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
51. SCAHAW. 2000. The welfare of chickens kept for meat production (broilers). http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/scah/out39_en.pdf Accessed Dec. 2007.
52. Sirri, F., G. Minelli, E. Folegatti, S. Lolli, and A. Meluzzi. 2007. Foot dermatitis and productive traits in broiler chickens kept with different stocking densities, litter types and light regimen. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 6: 734-736.
53. Steel, R. G. D., J. H. Torrie, and D. A. Dickey. 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. McGraw-Hill Co., New York, NY.
54. Su, G., P. Sørensen, and S. C. Kestin. 2000. A note on the effects of perches and litter substrate on leg weakness in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 79: 1259-1263.
55. Tablante, N. L., I. Estevez, and E. Russek-Cohen. 2003. Effect of perches and stocking density on tibial dyschondroplasia and bone mineralization as measured by bone ash in broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 12: 53-59.
56. Van Poucke, E., A. Van Nuffel, S. Van Dongen, B. Sonck, L. Lens, and F. A. M. Tuyttens. 2007. Experimental stress does not increase fluctuating asymmetry of broiler chickens at slaughter age. Poult. Sci. 86: 2110-2116.
57. Weeks, C. A., T. D. Danbury, H. C. Davies, P. Hunt, and S. C. Kestin. 2000. The behaviour of broiler chickens and its modification by lameness. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 67: 111-125.