Behavior of the domestic fowl in the presence of vertical panels

Poultry Science

Volumn 80, Issue 10, 2001, Pages 1455-1462

  Cornetto, T ^a   Estevez, I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavior; Broiler; Enrichment; Time budget

Indexed keywords

AGE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL HOUSING; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GROOMING; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME;

AGE FACTORS; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CHICKENS; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GROOMING; HOUSING, ANIMAL; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0035489085     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ps/80.10.1455     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Caraco, T., S. Martindale, and H. R. Pulliam, 1980. Avian time budgets and distance to cover. Auk, 97:872-875.
2. Cody, R. P., and J. K. Smith, 1991. Applied Statistics and the SAS® Programming Language. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
3. Collias, N. E., and E. C. Collias, 1967. A field study of the red jungle fowl in north-central India. Condor 69:360-386.
4. Cornetto, T., 2000. Influence of vertical panels on the use of space and behavior of the domestic fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus). M.S. Thesis. University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
5. Cornetto, T., and I. Estevez, 2001. Influence of vertical panels on use of space by domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 71:141-153.
6. Dawson, J. S., and P. B. Siegel, 1967. Behavior patterns of chickens to ten weeks of age. Poultry Sci. 45:615-622.
7. Delwiche, L. D., and S. J. Slaughter, 1998. The Little SAS Book. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
8. Estep, D. Q., and S. C. Baker, 1991. The effects of temporary cover on the behavior of socially housed stump-tailed macaques (Macaca arctoides). Zool. Biol. 10:465-472.
9. Estevez, I., 1994. Efecto del Tamano de Grupo y de las Condiciones de Manejo en el Compartamiento y Uso del Espacio del Gallo Domestico (Gallus gallus). Ph.D. Thesis. University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain.
10. Estevez, I., R. C. Newberry, and L. Arias de Reyna, 1997. Broiler chickens: A tolerant social system? Etologia 5:19-29.
11. Gvaryahu, G., D. L. Cunningham, and A. V. Tienhoven, 1989. Filial imprinting, environmental enrichment and music application effects on behavior and performance of meat strain chicks. Poultry Sci. 68:211-217.
12. Huber-Eicher, B., and B. Wechsler, 1997. Feather pecking in domestic chicks: Its relation to dustbathing and foraging. Anim. Behav. 54:757-768.
13. Keeling, L. J., 1987. Social spacing in domestic fowl. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, U.K.
14. Martin, P., and P. Bateson, 1993. Measuring Behavior: An Introductory Guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
15. Murphy, L. B., and A. P. Preston, 1988. Time-budgeting in meat chickens grown commercially. Br. Poult. Sci. 29:571-580.
16. Newberry, R. C., 1993. The space-time continuum, and its relevance to farm animals. Etologia 3:219-234.
17. Newberry, R. C., 1995. Environmental enrichment: increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 44:229-243.
18. Newberry, R. C., and J. W. Hall, 1990. Use of pen space by broiler chickens, effects of age and pen size. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 25:125-136.
19. Newberry, R. C., J. R. Hunt, and E. E. Gardiner, 1986. Light intensity effects on performance, activity, leg disorders, and sudden death syndrome of roaster chickens. Poultry Sci. 65:2232-2238.
20. Newberry, R. C., and D. M. Shackleton, 1997. Use of visual cover by domestic fowl, a Venetian blind effect. Anim. Behav. 54:387-395.
21. Newman, L. J., 1997. Proceedings of the Delmarva Broiler Housing and Flock Supervisors Conference, Salisbury, MD.
22. Pamment, P., F. Foenander, and G. McBride, 1982-1983. Social and spacing organization of male behavior in mated domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 9:341-349.
23. Preston, A. P., and L. B. Murphy, 1989. Movement of broiler chickens reared in commercial conditions. Br. Poult. Sci. 30:519-532.
24. Reed, H. J., L. J. Wilkins, S. D. Austin, and N. G. Gregory, 1993. The effect of environmental enrichment during rearing on fear reactions and depopulation trauma in adult caged hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 36:39-46.
25. Rose, S. P., A. Burnett, and R. A. Elmajeed, 1986, Factors affecting the diet selection of choice fed broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 27:215-224.
26. Savory, C. J., 1975. A growth study of broiler and layer chicks reared in single-strain and mixed strain groups. Br. Poult. Sci. 16:315-318.
27. Sherwin, C. M., 1993. Pecking behaviour of laying hens provided with a simple motorized environmental enrichment device. Br. Poult. Sci. 34:235-240.
28. Sherwin, C. M., P. D. Lewis, and G. C. Perry, 1999. The effects of environmental enrichment and intermittent lighting on the behaviour and welfare of male domestic turkeys. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 62:319-333.
29. Vestergaard, K., J. A. Hogan, and J. P. Kruijt, 1990. The development of a behavior system: dustbathing in the burmese red junglefowl I. The influence of the rearing environment on the organization of dustbathing. Behavior 112:99-116.
30. Whishaw, I. Q., H. C. Dringenberg, and T. A. Comery. 1992. Rats (Rattus norvegicus) modulate eating speed and vigilance to optimize food consumption: Effects of cover, circadian rhythm, food deprivation and individual differences. J. Comp. Psychol. 106:411-419.
31. Wood-Gush, D. G. M., I. J. H. Duncan, and C. J. Savory, 1978. Observations on the social behaviour of domestic fowl in the wild. Biol. Behav. 3:193-205.