Ecophysiological responses of salt cedar (Tamarix spp. L.) to the northern tamarisk beetle (Diorhabda carinulata Desbrochers) in a controlled environment

Biological Invasions

Volumn 12, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 3795-3808

  Snyder, Keirith A ^a   Uselman, Shauna M ^a   Jones, Timothy J ^a   Duke, Sara ^b  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological control; Insect herbivory; Invasive species; Leaf gas exchange; Nitrogen retranslocation; Root respiration and biomass

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; BELOWGROUND BIOMASS; BIOCONTROL AGENT; BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; BIOMASS ALLOCATION; ECOPHYSIOLOGY; GAS EXCHANGE; HERBIVORY; LARVA; NITROGEN; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION; RESPIRATION; RIPARIAN VEGETATION; ROOT SYSTEM; SHRUB; WATER STRESS;

COLEOPTERA; DIORHABDA; HEXAPODA; TAMARICACEAE; TAMARIX; TAMARIX RAMOSISSIMA;

EID: 77958014285     PISSN: 13873547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-010-9772-1     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Caird MA, Richards JH, Donovan LA (2007) Nighttime stomatal conductance and transpiration in C3 and C4 plants. Plant Physiol 143: 1-7.
2. Carruthers RI, Deloach CJ, Herr JC, Anderson GL, Knutson AE (2008) Salt cedar areawide management in the western US. In: Koul O, Cuperus GW, Elliott N (eds) Areawide pest management: theory and implementation. CABI, Cambridge, pp 270-309.
3. Chapin FS, Kedrowski RA (1983) Seasonal-changes in nitrogen and phosphorus fractions and autumn retranslocation in evergreen and deciduous Taiga trees. Ecology 64: 376-391.
4. Chapman SK, Hart SC, Cobb NS, Whitham TG, Koch GW (2003) Insect herbivory increases litter quality and decomposition: an extension of the acceleration hypothesis. Ecology 84: 2867-2876.
5. DeLoach CJ, Carruthers RI, Lovich JE, Dudley TL, Smith SD (2000) Ecological interactions in the biological control of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) in the United States: toward a new understanding. In: Spencer NR (ed) Proceedings of the X international symposium on biological control of weeds. Montana State University, Bozeman, pp 819-873.
6. Denslow JS, D'Antonio CM (2005) After biocontrol: assessing indirect effects of insect releases. Biol Control 35: 307-318.
7. Di Tomaso JM (1998) Impact, biology, and ecology of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) in the southwestern United States. Weed Technol 12: 326-336.
8. Dudley TL (2005) Progress and pitfalls in the biological control of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) in North America. Proceedings of the 16th US Department of Agriculture interagency research forum on gypsy moth and other invasive species. GTR-NE-337.
9. Eissenstat DM, Wells CE, Yanai RD, Whitbeck JL (2000) Building roots in a changing environment: implications for root longevity. New Phytol 147: 33-42.
10. Friedman JM, Auble GT, Shafroth PB, Scott ML, Merigliano MF, Preehling MD, Griffin EK (2005) Dominance of non-native riparian trees in western USA. Biol Invasions 7: 747-751.
11. Furutani SC, Arita LH, Fuji JK (1990) Relationship between simulated Chinese Rose Beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) feeding and photosynthetis rate reduction. Proc Hawaiian Entomol Soc 30: 97-104.
12. Gaskin JF, Schaal BA (2002) Hybrid Tamarix widespread in US invasion and undetected in native Asian range. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 11256-11259.
13. Gaskin JF, Ghahremani-nejad F, Zhang DY, Londo JP (2004) A systematic overview of Frankeniaceae and Tamaricaceae from nuclear rDNA and plastid sequence data. Ann Mo Bot Gard 91: 401-409.
14. Glenn EP, Nagler PL (2005) Comparative ecophysiology of Tamarix ramosissima and native trees in western US riparian zones. J Arid Environ 61: 419-446.
15. Holmgren NH, Holmgren PK, Cronquist A (2005) Intermountain flora, vascular plants of the intermountain west, USA, volume 2, part B. The New York Botanical Garden, New York.
16. Horton JL, Kolb TE, Hart SC (2001) Physiological response to groundwater depth varies among species and with river flow regulation. Ecol Appl 11: 1046-1059.
17. Hudgeons JL, Knutson AE, Heinz KM, DeLoach CJ, Dudley TL, Pattison RR, Kiniry JR (2007) Defoliation by introduced Diorhabda elongata leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) reduces carbohydrate reserves and regrowth of Tamarix (Tamaricaceae). Biol Control 43: 213-221.
18. Karban R, Baldwin IT (1997) Induced responses to herbivory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
19. Kosola KR, Dickmann DI, Paul EA, Parry D (2001) Repeated insect defoliation effects on growth, nitrogen acquisition, carbohydrates, and root demography of poplars. Oecologia 129: 65-74.
20. © for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS Institute Inc, Cary.
21. Morisette JT, Jarnevich CS, Ullah A, Cai WJ, Pedelty JA, Gentle JE, Stohlgren TJ, Schnase JL (2006) A tamarisk habitat suitability map for the continental United States. Front Ecol Environ 4: 11-17.
22. Nelson N (1944) A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for determination of glucose. J Biol Chem 153: 375-380.
23. Nobel PS, Alm DM, Cavelier J (1992) Growth respiration, maintenance respiration and structural- carbon costs for roots of 3 desert succulents. Funct Ecol 6: 79-85.
24. Norby RJ, Cotrufo MF, Ineson P, O'Neill EG, Canadell JG (2001) Elevated CO2, litter chemistry, and decomposition: a synthesis. Oecologia 127: 153-165.
25. Nowak RS, Caldwell MM (1984) A test of compensatory photosynthesis in the field-implications for herbivory tolerance. Oecologia 61: 311-318.
26. O'Neal ME, Landis DA, Isaacs R (2002) An inexpensive, accurate method for measuring leaf area and defoliation through digital image analysis. J Econ Entomol 95: 1190-1194.
27. Owens CS, Madsen JD (1998) Phenological studies of carbohydrate allocation in hydrilla. J Aquat Plant Manage 36: 40-44.
28. Raguse CA, Smith D (1965) Carbohydrate content in alfalfa herbage as influenced by methods of drying. J Agric Food Chem 13: 306-309.
29. Reich PB, Walters MB, Tjoelker MG, Vanderklein D, Buschena C (1998) Photosynthesis and respiration rates depend on leaf and root morphology and nitrogen concentration in nine boreal tree species differing in relative growth rate. Funct Ecol 12: 395-405.
30. Ritchie ME, Tilman D, Knops JMH (1998) Herbivore effects on plant and nitrogen dynamics in oak savanna. Ecology 79: 165-177.
31. Schowalter TD, Hargrove WW, Crossley DA (1986) Herbivory in forested ecosystems. Annu Rev Entomol 31: 177-196.
32. Schroder R, Forstreuter M, Hilker M (2005) A plant notices insect egg deposition and changes its rate of photosynthesis. Plant Physiol 138: 470-477.
33. Shain L, Hillis WE (1972) Ethylene Production in Pinus-Radiata in Response to Sirex-Amylostereum attack. Phytopathology 62: 1407-1409.
34. Snyder KA, Williams DG (2003) Defoliation alters water uptake by deep and shallow roots of Prosopis velutina (Velvet Mesquite). Funct Ecol 17: 363-374.
35. Snyder KA, Williams DG (2007) Root allocation and water uptake patterns in riparian tree saplings: responses to irrigation and defoliation. For Ecol Manage 246: 222-231.
36. Snyder KA, Richards JH, Donovan LA (2003) Night-time conductance in C-3 and C-4 species: do plants lose water at night? J Exp Bot 54: 861-865.
37. Stiling P, Simberloff D (1989) Leaf abscission-induced defense against pests or response to damage. Oikos 55: 43-49.
38. Swank JC, Below FE, Lambert RJ, Hageman RH (1982) Interaction of carbon and nitrogen-metabolism in the productivity of maize. Plant Physiol 70: 1185-1190.
39. Taylor JE, Whitelaw CA (2001) Signals in abscission. New Phytol 151: 323-339.
40. Tracy JL, Robbins TO (2009) Taxonomic revision and biogeography of the Tamarix-feeding Diorhabda elongata (Brullé, 1832) species group (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Galerucini) and analysis of their potential in biological control of Tamarisk. Zootaxa 2101: 1-152.
41. Uselman SM, Qualls RG, Lilienfein J (2007) Fine root production across a primary successional ecosystem chronosequence at Mt. Shasta, California. Ecosystems 10: 703-717.
42. Vandermeijden E, Wijn M, Verkaar HJ (1988) Defense and regrowth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. Oikos 51: 355-363.