Indeterminate ovarian mass at US: Incremental value of second imaging test for characterization-meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis

Radiology

Volumn 236, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 85-94

  Kinkel, Karen ^a,d   Lu, Ying ^b   Mehdizade, Amir ^c   Pelte, Marie Françoise ^a   Hricak, Hedvig ^c  

^a GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^d Institut de Radiologie   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OVARY CANCER; OVARY TUMOR; POSTMENOPAUSE; PREMENOPAUSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BAYES THEOREM; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MONTE CARLO METHOD; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS; POSTMENOPAUSE; PREMENOPAUSE; PREVALENCE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER;

EID: 20744441821     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2361041618     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Gynecologic sonography. Report of the ultrasonography task force. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. JAMA 1991; 265:2851-2855.
2. Kinkel K, Hricak H, Lu Y, Tsuda K, Filly RA. US characterization of ovarian masses: a meta-analysis. Radiology 2000; 217:803-811.
3. Kurtz AB, Tsimikas JV, Tempany CM, et al. Diagnosis and staging of ovarian cancer: comparative values of Doppler and conventional US, CT, and MR imaging correlated with surgery and histopathologic analysis-report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology 1999; 212: 19-27.
4. Moses LE, Shapiro D, Littenberg B. Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations. Stat Med 1993; 12:1293-1316.
5. Valentin L. Prospective cross-validation of Doppler ultrasound examination and gray-scale ultrasound imaging for discrimination of benign and malignant pelvic masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14:273-283.
6. Schelling M, Braun M, Kuhn W, et al. Combined transvaginal B-mode and color Doppler sonography for differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors: results of a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 77:78-86.
7. Guerriero S, Alcazar JL, Ajossa S, et al. Comparison of conventional color Doppler imaging and power Doppler imaging for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer: results of a European study. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 83:299-304.
8. Grab D, Flock F, Stohr I, et al. Classification of asymptomatic adnexal masses by ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 77:454-459.
9. Kurjak A, Predanic M. New scoring system for prediction of ovarian malignancy based on transvaginal color Doppler sonography. J Ultrasound Med 1992; 11: 631-638.
10. Bromley B, Goodman H, Benacerraf BR. Comparison between sonographic morphology and Doppler waveform for the diagnosis of ovarian malignancy. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83:434-437.
11. Buy JN, Ghossain MA, Hugol D, et al. Characterization of adnexal masses: combination of color Doppler and conventional sonography compared with spectral Doppler analysis alone and conventional sonography alone. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166:385-393.
12. Caruso A, Caforio L, Testa AC, Ciampelli M, Panici PB, Mancuso S. Transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography in the presurgical characterization of adnexal masses. Gynecol Oncol 1996; 63:184-191.
13. Rehn M, Lohmann K, Rempen A. Transvaginal ultrasonography of pelvic masses: evaluation of B-mode technique and Doppler ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175:97-104.
14. Brown DL, Doubilet PM, Miller FH, et al. Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features. Radiology 1998; 208:103-110.
15. Alcazar JL, Jurado M. Using a logistic model to predict malignancy of adnexal masses based on menopausal status, ultrasound morphology, and color Doppler findings. Gynecol Oncol 1998; 69:146-150.
16. Buy JN, Ghossain MA, Sciot C, et al. Epithelial tumors of the ovary: CT findings and correlation with US. Radiology 1991; 178:811-818.
17. Buist MR, Golding RP, Burger CW, et al. Comparative evaluation of diagnostic methods in ovarian carcinoma with emphasis on CT and MRI. Gynecol Oncol 1994; 52:191-198.
18. Kubik-Huch RA, Dorffler W, von Schulthess GK, et al. Value of (18F)-FDG positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing primary and recurrent ovarian carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 761-767.
19. Thurnher SA. MR imaging of pelvic masses in women: contrast-enhanced vs unenhanced images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 159:1243-1250.
20. Yamashita Y, Torashima M, Hatanaka Y, et al. Adnexal masses: accuracy of characterization with transvaginal US and precontrast and postcontrast MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 194:557-565.
21. Hricak H, Chen M, Coakley FV, et al. Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging-multivariate analysis. Radiology 2000; 214:39-46.
22. Hata K, Hata T, Manabe A, Sugimura K, Kitao M. A critical evaluation of transvaginal Doppler studies, transvaginal sonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and CA 125 in detecting ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80:922-926.
23. Medl M, Kulenkampff KJ, Stiskal M, Peters-Engl C, Leodolter S, Czembirek H. Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of suspected ovarian masses. Anticancer Res 1995; 15:1123-1125.
24. Komatsu T, Konishi I, Mandai M, et al. Adnexal masses: transvaginal US and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging assessment of intratumoral structure. Radiology 1996; 198:109-115.
25. Reuter M, Steffens J, Schuppler U, et al. Critical evaluation of the specificity of MRI and TVUS for differentiation of malignant from benign adnexal lesions. Eur Radiol 1998; 8:39-44.
26. Rieber A, Nussle K, Stohr I, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors with MR imaging: comparison with transvaginal sonography, positron emission tomography, and histologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:123-129.
27. Huber S, Medl M, Baumann L, Czembirek H. Value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of suspected ovarian masses. Anti-cancer Res 2002; 22:2501-2507.
28. Irwig L, Tosteson AN, Gatsonis C, et al. Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120:667-676.
29. McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized linear models. In: Cox DR, Hinkley DV, eds. Monographs on statistics and applied probability. Monograph no. 37. London, England: Chapman & Hall, 1983.
30. Rippley BD. Stochastic simulation. New York, NY: Wiley, 1987.
31. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994; 271:703-707.
32. Nowak M, Szpakowski M, Malinowski A, et al. Ovarian tumors in the reproductive age group. Ginekol Pol 2002; 73:354-358.
33. Guerriero S, Mallarini G, Ajossa S, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound and computed tomography combined with clinical parameters and CA-125 determinations in the differential diagnosis of persistent ovarian cysts in premenopausal women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9:339-343.
34. Botta G, Zarcone R. Trans-vaginal ultrasound examination of ovarian masses in premenopausal women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995; 62:37-41.
35. Prompeler HJ, Madjar H, Sauerbrei W. Classification of adnexal tumors by transvaginal color Doppler. Gynecol Oncol 1996; 61:354-363.
36. Koonings PP, Campbell K, Mishell DR Jr, Grimes DA. Relative frequency of primary ovarian neoplasms: a 10-year review. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74:921-926.
37. Botsis D, Kassanos D, Kalogirou D, Karakitsos P, Liapis A, Antoniou G. Transvaginal color Doppler and CA125 as tools in the differential diagnosis of postmenopausal ovarian masses. Maturitas 1997; 26:203-209.
38. Osmers RG, Osmers M, von Maydell B, Wagner B, Kuhn W. Evaluation of ovarian tumors in postmenopausal women by transvaginal sonography. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998; 77:81-88.
39. Ovadia J, Goldman GA. Ovarian masses in postmenopausal women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1992; 39:35-39.
40. Satoh S, Takashima T, Nakano H. Role of imaging modalities in ovarian tumors. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002; 76:195-197.
41. Jacobs I, Oram D, Fairbanks J, Turner J, Frost C, Grudzinskas JG. A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97:922-929.
42. Bailey CL, Ueland FR, Land GL, et al. The malignant potential of small cystic ovarian tumors in women over 50 years of age. Gynecol Oncol 1998; 69:3-7.
43. Goldstein SR, Subramanyam B, Snyder JR, Beller U, Raghavendra BN, Beckman EM. The postmenopausal cystic adnexal mass: the potential role of ultrasound in conservative management. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73:8-10.
44. Goldstein SR. Postmenopausal adnexal cysts: how clinical management has evolved. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 1498-1501.
45. Kawai M, Kikkawa F, Ishikawa H, et al. Differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors by transvaginal color-pulse Doppler sonography. Gynecol Oncol 1994; 54:209-214.
46. Antonic J, Rakar S. Colour and pulsed Doppler US and tumour marker CA 125 in differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian masses. Anticancer Res 1995; 15:1527-1532.
47. Strigini FA, Gadducci A, Del Bravo B, Ferdeghini M, Genazzani AR. Differential diagnosis of adnexal masses with transvaginal sonography, color flow imaging, and serum CA 125 assay in pre- and postmenopausal women. Gynecol Oncol 1996; 61: 68-72.
48. Tingulstad S, Hagen B, Skjeldestad FE, et al. Evaluation of a risk of malignancy index based on serum CA125, ultrasound findings and menopausal status in the preoperative diagnosis of pelvic masses. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103:826-831.