Biological synthesis of tooth enamel instructed by an artificial matrix

Biomaterials

Volumn 31, Issue 35, 2010, Pages 9202-9211

  Huang, Zhan ^a   Newcomb, Christina J ^b   Bringas Jr , Pablo ^a   Stupp, Samuel I ^b,c   Snead, Malcolm L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell activation; Epithelial cell; Extracellular matrix; Peptide amphiphile; RGDS peptide; Self assembly

Indexed keywords

CELL ACTIVATION; EPITHELIAL CELLS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES; PEPTIDE AMPHIPHILE; RGDS PEPTIDES;

AMPHIPHILES; CELL DEATH; ENAMELS; HYDROXYAPATITE; PEPTIDES; SELF ASSEMBLY; TISSUE;

TOOTH ENAMEL;

AMPHOPHILE; ARGINYLGLYCYLASPARTYLSERINE; HYDROXYAPATITE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL ACTIVATION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; ENAMEL; EPITHELIUM CELL; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FEMALE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INCISOR; KIDNEY CAPSULE; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; TOOTH DEVELOPMENT; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ANIMALS; DENTAL ENAMEL; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FEMALE; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; HYDROXYAPATITES; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MICE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING TRANSMISSION; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, TRANSMISSION; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; OLIGOPEPTIDES; PREGNANCY; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

VERTEBRATA;

EID: 77957935322     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.013     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Taubman M.A., Nash D.A. The scientific and public-health imperative for a vaccine against dental caries. Nat Rev Immunol 2006, 6:555-563.
2. Robinson C., Shore R.C., Brookes S.J., Strafford S., Wood S.R., Kirkham J. The chemistry of enamel caries. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2000, 11:481-495.
3. Caufield P.W., Li Y., Dasanayake A. Dental caries: an infectious and transmissible disease. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2005, 26:10-16.
4. Hu B., Nadiri A., Kuchler-Bopp S., Perrin-Schmitt F., Peters H., Lesot H. Tissue engineering of tooth crown, root, and periodontium. Tissue Eng 2006, 12:2069-2075.
5. Mitsiadis T.A., Graf D. Cell fate determination during tooth development and regeneration. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 2009, 87:199-211.
6. Duailibi S.E., Duailibi M.T., Vacanti J.P., Yelick P.C. Prospects for tooth regeneration. Periodontol 2000, 2006(41):177-187.
7. Chai Y., Slavkin H.C. Prospects for tooth regeneration in the 21st century: a perspective. Microsc Res Tech 2003, 60:469-479.
8. Thesleff I., Wang X.P., Suomalainen M. Regulation of epithelial stem cells in tooth regeneration. C R Biol 2007, 330:561-564.
9. Snead M.L. Whole-tooth regeneration: it takes a village of scientists, clinicians, and patients. J Dent Educ 2008, 72:903-911.
10. Sharpe P.T., Young C.S. Test-tube teeth. Sci Am 2005, 293:34-41.
11. Boyde A. Microstructure of enamel. Ciba Found Symp 1997, 205:18-27. discussion-31.
12. Zaslansky P., Friesem A.A., Weiner S. Structure and mechanical properties of the soft zone separating bulk dentin and enamel in crowns of human teeth: insight into tooth function. J Struct Biol 2006, 153:188-199.
13. Paine M.L., White S.N., Luo W., Fong H., Sarikaya M., Snead M.L. Regulated gene expression dictates enamel structure and tooth function. Matrix Biol 2001, 20:273-292.
14. Weiner S., Addadi L. Biomineralization. At the cutting edge. Science 2002, 298:375-376.
15. White S.N., Luo W., Paine M.L., Fong H., Sarikaya M., Snead M.L. Biological organization of hydroxyapatite crystallites into a fibrous continuum toughens and controls anisotropy in human enamel. J Dent Res 2001, 80:321-326.
16. Robinson C., Brookes S.J., Shore R.C., Kirkham J. The developing enamel matrix: nature and function. Eur J Oral Sci 1998, 106(Suppl. 1):282-291.
17. Smith C.E. Cellular and chemical events during enamel maturation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1998, 9:128-161.
18. Simmer J.P., Fincham A.G. Molecular mechanisms of dental enamel formation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1995, 6:84-108.
19. Fong H., White S.N., Paine M.L., Luo W., Snead M.L., Sarikaya M. Enamel structure properties controlled by engineered proteins in transgenic mice. J Bone Miner Res 2003, 18:2052-2059.
20. Bechtle S., Habelitz S., Klocke A., Fett T., Schneider G.A. The fracture behaviour of dental enamel. Biomaterials 2009, 31:375-384.
21. Arsenault A.L., Robinson B.W. The dentino-enamel junction: a structural and microanalytical study of early mineralization. Calcif Tissue Int 1989, 45:111-121.
22. Diekwisch T.G., Berman B.J., Gentner S., Slavkin H.C. Initial enamel crystals are not spatially associated with mineralized dentine. Cell Tissue Res 1995, 279:149-167.
23. Fincham A.G., Moradian-Oldak J., Diekwisch T.G., Lyaruu D.M., Wright J.T., Bringas P., et al. Evidence for amelogenin " nanospheres" as functional components of secretory-stage enamel matrix. J Struct Biol 1995, 115:50-59.
24. Tarasevich B.J., Howard C.J., Larson J.L., Snead M.L., Simmer J.P., Paine M., et al. The nucleation and growth of calcium phosphate by amelogenin. J Cryst Growth 2007, 304:407-415.
25. Warshawsky H., Smith C.E. A three-dimensional reconstruction of the rods in rat maxillary incisor enamel. Anat Rec 1971, 169:585-591.
26. Du C., Falini G., Fermani S., Abbott C., Moradian-Oldak J. Supramolecular assembly of amelogenin nanospheres into birefringent microribbons. Science 2005, 307:1450-1454.
27. Hu C.C., Fukae M., Uchida T., Qian Q., Zhang C.H., Ryu O.H., et al. Sheathlin: cloning, cDNA/polypeptide sequences, and immunolocalization of porcine enamel sheath proteins. J Dent Res 1997, 76:648-657.
28. Fukumoto S., Kiba T., Hall B., Iehara N., Nakamura T., Longenecker G., et al. Ameloblastin is a cell adhesion molecule required for maintaining the differentiation state of ameloblasts. J Cell Biol 2004, 167:973-983.
29. Zhu D., Paine M.L., Luo W., Bringas P., Snead M.L. Altering biomineralization by protein design. J Biol Chem 2006, 281:21173-21182.
30. Simmer J.P., Hu J.C. Expression, structure, and function of enamel proteinases. Connect Tissue Res 2002, 43:441-449.
31. Slavkin H.C. Molecular determinants of tooth development: a review. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1990, 1:1-16.
32. Jowett A.K., Vainio S., Ferguson M.W., Sharpe P.T., Thesleff I. Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions are required for msx 1 and msx 2 gene expression in the developing murine molar tooth. Development 1993, 117:461-470.
33. Chen Y., Bei M., Woo I., Satokata I., Maas R. Msx1 controls inductive signaling in mammalian tooth morphogenesis. Development 1996, 122:3035-3044.
34. Thesleff I., Vaahtokari A., Partanen A.M. Regulation of organogenesis. Common molecular mechanisms regulating the development of teeth and other organs. Int J Dev Biol 1995, 39:35-50.
35. Salmivirta K., Gullberg D., Hirsch E., Altruda F., Ekblom P. Integrin subunit expression associated with epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during murine tooth development. Dev Dyn 1996, 205:104-113.
36. Fukumoto S., Yamada Y. Review: extracellular matrix regulates tooth morphogenesis. Connect Tissue Res 2005, 46:220-226.
37. Thesleff I., Stenman S., Vaheri A., Timpl R. Changes in the matrix proteins, fibronectin and collagen, during differentiation of mouse tooth germ. Dev Biol 1979, 70:116-126.
38. Gollard R.P., Slavkin H.C., Snead M.L. Polyoma virus-induced murine odontogenic tumors. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992, 74:761-767.
39. Hurmerinta K., Kuusela P., Thesleff I. The cellular origin of fibronectin in the basement membrane zone of developing tooth. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1986, 95:73-80.
40. Tabata M.J., Matsumura T., Fujii T., Abe M., Kurisu K. Fibronectin accelerates the growth and differentiation of ameloblast lineage cells in vitro. J Histochem Cytochem 2003, 51:1673-1679.
41. Beyeler M., Schild C., Lutz R., Chiquet M., Trueb B. Identification of a fibronectin interaction site in the extracellular matrix protein ameloblastin. Exp Cell Res 2010, 316:1202-1212.
42. Asaka T., Akiyama M., Domon T., Nishie W., Natsuga K., Fujita Y., et al. Type XVII collagen is a key player in tooth enamel formation. Am J Pathol 2009, 174:91-100.
43. Wright J.T., Hall K.I., Deaton T.G., Fine J.D. Structural and compositional alteration of tooth enamel in hereditary epidermolysis bullosa. Connect Tissue Res 1996, 34:271-279.
44. Fukumoto S., Miner J.H., Ida H., Fukumoto E., Yuasa K., Miyazaki H., et al. Laminin alpha5 is required for dental epithelium growth and polarity and the development of tooth bud and shape. J Biol Chem 2006, 281:5008-5016.
45. Bei M., Stowell S., Maas R. Msx2 controls ameloblast terminal differentiation. Dev Dyn 2004, 231:758-765.
46. Ryan M.C., Lee K., Miyashita Y., Carter W.G. Targeted disruption of the LAMA3 gene in mice reveals abnormalities in survival and late stage differentiation of epithelial cells. J Cell Biol 1999, 145:1309-1323.
47. Hormia M., Sahlberg C., Thesleff I., Airenne T. The epithelium-tooth interface-a basal lamina rich in laminin-5 and lacking other known laminin isoforms. J Dent Res 1998, 77:1479-1485.
48. Stupp S.I., LeBonheur V.V., Walker K., Li L.S., Huggins K.E., Keser M., et al. Supramolecular materials: self-organized nanostructures. Science 1997, 276:384-389.
49. Hartgerink J.D., Beniash E., Stupp S.I. Peptide-amphiphile nanofibers: a versatile scaffold for the preparation of self-assembling materials. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:5133-5138.
50. Cui H., Webber M.J., Stupp S.I. Self-assembly of peptide amphiphiles: from molecules to nanostructures to biomaterials. Biopolymers 2010, 94:1-18.
51. Rajangam K., Behanna H.A., Hui M.J., Han X., Hulvat J.F., Lomasney J.W., et al. Heparin binding nanostructures to promote growth of blood vessels. Nano Lett 2006, 6:2086-2090.
52. Silva G.A., Czeisler C., Niece K.L., Beniash E., Harrington D.A., Kessler J.A., et al. Selective differentiation of neural progenitor cells by high-epitope density nanofibers. Science 2004, 303:1352-1355.
53. Storrie H., Guler M.O., Abu-Amara S.N., Volberg T., Rao M., Geiger B., et al. Supramolecular crafting of cell adhesion. Biomaterials 2007, 28:4608-4618.
54. Webber M.J., Tongers J., Renault M.A., Roncalli J.G., Losordo D.W., Stupp S.I. Development of bioactive peptide amphiphiles for therapeutic cell delivery. Acta Biomater 2010, 6:3-11.
55. Ghanaati S., Webber M.J., Unger R.E., Orth C., Hulvat J.F., Kiehna S.E., et al. Dynamic in vivo biocompatibility of angiogenic peptide amphiphile nanofibers. Biomaterials 2009, 30:6202-6212.
56. Hartgerink J.D., Beniash E., Stupp S.I. Self-assembly and mineralization of peptide-amphiphile nanofibers. Science 2001, 294:1684-1688.
57. Spoerke E.D., Anthony S.G., Stupp S.I. Enzyme directed templating of artificial bone mineral. Adv Mater 2009, 21:425-430.
58. Palmer L.C., Newcomb C.J., Kaltz S.R., Spoerke E.D., Stupp S.I. Biomimetic systems for hydroxyapatite mineralization inspired by bone and enamel. Chem Rev 2008, 108:4754-4783.
59. Mata A., Geng Y., Henrikson K.J., Aparicio C., Stock S.R., Satcher R.L., et al. Bone regeneration mediated by biomimetic mineralization of a nanofiber matrix. Biomaterials 2010, 31:6004-6012.
60. Rajangam K., Arnold M.S., Rocco M.A., Stupp S.I. Peptide amphiphile nanostructure-heparin interactions and their relationship to bioactivity. Biomaterials 2008, 29:3298-3305.
61. Guler M.O., Hsu L., Soukasene S., Harrington D.A., Hulvat J.F., Stupp S.I. Presentation of RGDS epitopes on self-assembled nanofibers of branched peptide amphiphiles. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7:1855-1863.
62. Guler M.O., Soukasene S., Hulvat J.F., Stupp S.I. Presentation and recognition of biotin on nanofibers formed by branched peptide amphiphiles. Nano Lett 2005, 5:249-252.
63. Huang Z., Sargeant T.D., Hulvat J.F., Mata A., Bringas P., Koh C.Y., et al. Bioactive nanofibers instruct cells to proliferate and differentiate during enamel regeneration. J Bone Miner Res 2008, 23:1995-2006.
64. Kallenbach E. Electron microscopy of the differentiating rat incisor ameloblast. J Ultrastruct Res 1971, 35:508-531.
65. Giannuzzi L.A., Stevie F.A. A review of focused ion beam milling techniques for TEM specimen preparation. Micron 1999, 30:197-204.
66. Jantou V., Turmaine M., West G.D., Horton M.A., McComb D.W. Focused ion beam milling and ultramicrotomy of mineralised ivory dentine for analytical transmission electron microscopy. Micron 2009, 40:495-501.
67. Nalla R.K., Porter A.E., Daraio C., Minor A.M., Radmilovic V., Stach E.A., et al. Ultrastructural examination of dentin using focused ion-beam cross-sectioning and transmission electron microscopy. Micron 2005, 36:672-680.
68. Jodaikin A., Weiner S., Traub W. Enamel rod relations in the developing rat incisor. J Ultrastruct Res 1984, 89:324-332.
69. Paine M.L., Snead M.L. Protein interactions during assembly of the enamel organic extracellular matrix. J Bone Miner Res 1997, 12:221-227.
70. Amar S., Luo W., Snead M.L., Ruch J.V. Amelogenin gene expression in mouse incisor heterotopic recombinations. Differentiation 1989, 41:56-61.
71. Couwenhoven R.I., Snead M.L. Early determination and permissive expression of amelogenin transcription during mouse mandibular first molar development. Dev Biol 1994, 164:290-299.
72. Xu Y., Zhou Y.L., Luo W., Zhu Q.S., Levy D., MacDougald O.A., et al. NF-Y and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha synergistically activate the mouse amelogenin gene. J Biol Chem 2006, 281:16090-16098.
73. Tummers M., Thesleff I. The importance of signal pathway modulation in all aspects of tooth development. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 2009, 312B:309-319.
74. Hu B., Unda F., Bopp-Kuchler S., Jimenez L., Wang X.J., Haikel Y., et al. Bone marrow cells can give rise to ameloblast-like cells. J Dent Res 2006, 85:416-421.