Reduced gene flow at pericentromeric loci in a hybrid zone involving chromosomal races of the house mouse Mus musculus domesticus

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 2020-2032

  Franchini, Paolo ^a,d   Colangelo, Paolo ^a,b   Solano, Emanuela ^a,d   Capanna, Ernesto ^a   Verheyen, Erik ^c   Castiglia, Riccardo ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b CNR   (Italy)

^c ROYAL BELGIAN INSTITUTE OF NATURAL SCIENCES   (Belgium)

^d STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Chromosomal evolution; Microsatellites; Recombination; Robertsonian metacentric; Speciation

Indexed keywords

MUS; MUS MUSCULUS; MUS MUSCULUS DOMESTICUS; ROBERTSONIA;

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; GENE FLOW; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION; ITALY; KARYOTYPING; MOUSE; POPULATION GENETICS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; TELOMERE;

ANIMALS; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; GENE FLOW; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; ITALY; KARYOTYPING; MICE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TELOMERE;

EID: 77957917528     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00964.x     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Andersson, A. C., Y. Narain, H. Tegelström, and K. Fredga. 2004. No apparent reduction of gene flow in a hybrid zone between the West and North European karyotypic groups of the common shrew, Sorex araneus. Mol. Ecol. 13:1205-1215.
2. Ayala, F. J., and M. Coluzzi. 2005. Chromosome speciation: Humans, Drosophila and mosquitoes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:6535- 6542.
3. Balloux, F., and N. Lugon-Moulin. 2002. The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers. Mol. Ecol. 11:155-165.
4. Barton, N. H. 1979. The dynamics of hybrid zones. Heredity 43:341-359.
5. Barton, N. H., and G.M. Hewitt. 1981. Hybrid zones and speciation. Pp. 109- 145 inW. R. Atchley and D. S.Woodruff, eds. Evolution and speciation: essays in honor of M. J. D. White. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
6. Barton, N. H., and G.M. Hewitt. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:113-148.
7. Basset, P., G. Yannic, H. Brünner, and J. Hausser. 2006. Restricted gene flow at specific parts of the shrew genome in chromosomal hybrid zones. Evolution 60:1718-1730.
8. Benjamini, Y., and Y. Hochberg. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate-a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Meth. 1995:289-300.
9. Bidau, C. J.,M. D. Giménez, C. L. Palmer, and J. B. Searle. 2001. The effects of Robertsonian fusions on chiasma frequency and distribution in the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus) from a hybrid zone in northern Scotland. Heredity 87:305-313.
10. Britton-Davidian, J., H. Sonjaya, J. Catalan, and G. Cattaneo-Berrebi. 1990. Robertsonian heterozygosity in wild mice: fertility and transmission rates in Rb (16. 17) translocation heterozygous. Genetica 80:171- 174.
11. Butlin, R. K. 2005. Recombination and speciation. Mol. Ecol. 14:2621- 2635.
12. Capanna, E. 1982. Robertsonian numerical variation in animal speciation: Mus musculus, an emblematic model. Pp. 155-177 in C. Barigozzi, ed. Mechanism of speciation. Alan Liss, New York.
13. Capanna, E., M. Cristaldi, P. Perticone, and M. Rizzoni. 1975. Identification of chromosomes involved in the 9 Robertsonian fusions of the Apennine mouse with a 22-chromosome karyotype. Experientia 31:294-296.
14. Carneiro, M., N. Ferrand, and M. W. Nachman. 2009. Recombination and speciation: loci near centromeres are more differentiated than loci near telomeres between subspecies of the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Genetics 181:593-606.
15. Castiglia, R., and E. Capanna. 1999. Contact zones between chromosomal races of Mus musculus domesticus. 1. Temporal analysis of hybrid zone between the CD chromosomal race (2n = 22) and populations with the standard karyotype. Heredity 83:319-326.
16. Castiglia, R., and E. Capanna. 2000. Contact zone between chromosomal races of Mus musculus domesticus. 2. Fertility and segregation in laboratory-reared and wild mice heterozygous for multiple Robertsonian rearrangements. Heredity 85:147-156.
17. Castiglia, R., and E. Capanna. 2002. Chiasma repatterning across a chromosomal hybrid zone between chromosomal races of Mus musculus domesticus. Genetica 114:35-40.
18. Chatti, N., J. Britton-Davidian, J. Catalan, J.-C. Auffray, and K. Saïd. 2005. Reproductive trait divergence and hybrid fertility patterns between chromosomal races of the house mouse in Tunisia: analysis of wild and laboratory-bred males and females. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 84:407-416.
19. Coyne, J. A., andH.A.Orr. 2004. Speciation. SinauerAssociates, Sunderland, MA.
20. Cucchi, T., J. D. Vigne, and J.-C. Auffray. 2005. First occurrence of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus Schwarz & Schwarz, 1943) in the Western Mediterranean: a zooarchaeological revision of sub-fossil house mouse occurrences. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 84:429-445.
21. Dallas, J. F., F. Bonhomme, P. Boursot, J. Britton-Davidian, and V. Bauchau. 1998. Population genetic structure in a Robertsonian race of housemice: evidence from microsatellite polymorphism. Heredity 80:70-77.
22. Davisson, M. T., and E. C. Akeson. 1993. Recombination suppression by heterozygous Robertsonian chromosomes in the Mouse. Genetics 133:649- 667.
23. Dietrich, W. F., J. Miller, R. Steen, M. A. Merchant, D. Damron-Boles, Z. Husain, R. Dredge,M. J. Daly, K. A. Ingalls, T. J. O'Conner, et al. 1996. A comprehensive genetic map of the mouse genome. Nature 380:149-152.
24. Dumas, D., and J. Britton-Davidian. 2002. Chromosomal rearrangements and evolution of recombination: comparison of chiasma distribution patterns in standard and Robertsonian populations of the house mouse. Genetics 162:1355-1366.
25. Evanno, G., S. Regnaut, and J. Goudet. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the softwareSTRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 14:2611-2620.
26. Falush, D., M. Stephens, and J. K. Pritchard. 2003. Inference of population structure usingmultilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567-1587.
27. Franchini, P., R. Castiglia, and E. Capanna. 2008. Reproductive isolation between chromosomal races of the housemouse Mus musculus domesticus in a parapatric contact area revealed by an analysis of multiple unlinked loci. J. Evol. Biol. 21:502-513.
28. Gaggiotti, O. E.,O. Lange,K. Rassmann, and C.Gliddon. 1999.Acomparison of two indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow using microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. 8:1513-1520.
29. Goudet, J. 2001. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Institut d'Ecologie, Bâtiment de Biologie, Université de Lausanne, Switzerland.
30. Goudet, J., M. Raymond, T. De Meeus, and F. Rousset. 1996. Testing differentiation in diploid populations. Genetics 144:1933-1940.
31. Guo, S. W., and E. A. Thompson. 1992. Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportions for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48:361-372.
32. Hartl, D. L., and A. G. Clark. 1997. Principles of population genetics. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
33. Hauffe, H. C., and J. B. Searle. 1998. Chromosomal heterozygosity and fertility in house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) from northern Italy. Genetics 150:1143-1154.
34. Heckel, G., R. Burri, S. Fink, J.-F. Desmet, and L. Excoffier. 2005. Genetic structure and colonization processes in European populations of the common vole Microtus arvalis. Evolution 59:2231-2242.
35. Hewitt, G. M. 1988. Hybrid zones-Natural laboratories for evolutionary studies. Trend Ecol. Evol. 3:158-167.
36. Hoffmann, A. A., and L. H. Rieseberg. 2008. Revisiting the impact of inversions in evolution: from population genetic markers to drivers of adaptive shifts and speciation? Ann. Rev. Evol. Evol. Syst. 39:21-42.
37. Hsu, T. C., and J. I. Patton. 1969. Bone marrow preparations for chromosome studies. Pp. 454-460 in K. Bemirschke, ed. Comparative mammalian cytogenetics. Springer Verlag, Berlin. Heikdelberg, New York.
38. Kawakami, T., R. K. Butlin, M. Adams, D. J. Paull, and S. J. B. Cooper. 2008. Genetic analysis of a chromosomal hybrid zone in the Australian morabine grasshoppers (Vandiemenella, viatica species group). Evolution 63:139-152.
39. King, M. 1993. Species evolution, the role of chromosome change. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
40. Louis, E. J., and E. R. Dempster. 1987. An exact test for Hardy-Weinberg and multiple alleles. Biometrics 43:805-811.
41. Navarro, A., and N. H. Barton. 2003. Chromosomal speciation and molecular divergence: accelerated evolution in rearranged chromosomes. Science 300:321-324.
42. Ortiz-Barrientos, D., J. Reiland, J. Hey, and M. A. F. Noor. 2002. Recombination and the divergence of hybridizing species. Genetica 116:167- 178.
43. Panithanarak, T., H. C. Hauffe, J. F. Dallas, A. Glover, R. G. Ward, and J. B. Searle. 2004. Linkage-dependent gene flow in a house mouse chromosomal hybrid zone. Evolution 58:184-192.
44. Piálek, J., H. C. Hauffe, K. M. Rodriguez-Clark, and J. B. Searle. 2001. Raciation and speciation in house mice from the Alps: the role of chromosomes. Mol. Ecol. 10:613-625.
45. Piálek, J., H. C. Hauffe, and J. B. Searle. 2005. Chromosomal variation in the house mouse. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 84:535-563.
46. Pocock, M. J. O., H. C. Hauffe, and J. B. Searle. 2005. Dispersal in house mice. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 84:565-583.
47. Pritchard, J. K., M. Stephens, and P. J. Donnelly. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945-959.
48. Raymond, M., and F. Rousset. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86:248- 249.
49. Rieseberg, L. H. 2001. Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:351-358.
50. Rieseberg, L. H., and J. H. Willis. 2007. Plant speciation. Science 317:910-914.
51. Rieseberg, L. H., J. Whitton, and K. Gardner. 1999. Hybrid zones and the genetic architecture of a barrier to gene flow between two sunflowers species. Genetics 152:713-727.
52. Rosenberg, N. 2004. DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4:137-138.
53. Rousset, F. 1997. Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145:1219-1228.
54. Sage, R. D., W. R. Atchley, and E. Capanna. 1993. House mice as models in systematic biology. Syst. Biol. 42:523-561.
55. Seabright, M. 1971. A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 2:971-972.
56. Searle, J. B. 1993. Chromosomal hybrid zones in eutherian mammals. Pp. 309-353 in R. G. Harrison, eds. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
57. Sharp, H. E., and D. M. Rowell. 2007. Unprecedented chromosomal diversity and behaviour modify linkage patterns and speciation potential: structural heterozygosity in an Australian spider. J. Evol. Biol. 20:2427- 2439.
58. Shifman, S., J. T. Bell, R. R. Copley, M. S. Taylor, R. W. Williams, R. Mott, and J. Flint. 2006. A high-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism genetic map of the mouse genome. PLoS Biol. 4:e395.
59. Slatkin,M. 1995.Ameasure of population subdivision based onmicrosatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139:457-462.
60. Spirito, F., A. Modesti, P. Perticone, M. Cristaldi, R. Federici, and M. Rizzoni. 1980. Mechanisms of fixation and accumulation of centric fusions in natural populations of Mus musculus L. I. Karylogical analysis of a hybrid zone between two populations in the central Apennines. Evolution 34:453-466.
61. Van Oosterhout, C., W. F. Hutchinson, D. P. Wills, and P. Shipley. 2004. MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4:535-538.
62. Wallace, B. M. N., J. B. Searle, and C. A. Everett. 1992. Male meiosis and gametogenesis inwild housemousemice (Musmusculus domesticus) from a chromosomal hybrid zone; a comparison between "simple" Robertsonian heterozygotes and homozygotes. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 61:211- 220.
63. Weir,B. S., andC.C.Cockerham. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358-1370.
64. White, M. J. D. 1978. Modes of speciation. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, CA.
65. Wright, S. 1965. The interpretation of population structure by Fstatistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19:395-420.