Contact zones between chromosomal races of Mus musculus domesticus. 1. Temporal analysis of a hybrid zone between the CD chromosomal race (2n=22) and populations with the standard karyotype

Heredity

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 319-326

  Castiglia, Riccardo ^a   Capanna, Ernesto ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Hybrid zones; Mus musculus domesticus; Robertsonian races

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME DIFFERENTIATION; HOMOZYGOSITY; HYBRIDIZATION; ITALY; KARYOTYPE; MAMMALIAN GENETICS;

MAMMALIA; MUS; MUS DOMESTICUS; MUS MUSCULUS DOMESTICUS; MUSCULUS; ROBERTSONIA; RODENTIA;

EID: 0033197532     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6885820     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. BARTON, N. H. 1979. The dynamics of hybrid zones. Heredity, 43, 341-359.
2. BARTON, N. H. AND GALE, K. S. 1993. Genetic analysis of hybrid zones. In: Harrison, R. G. (ed.) Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process, pp. 13-15. Oxford University Press, New York.
3. BARTON, N. H. AND HEWITT, G. M. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 16, 113-148.
4. BELKHIR, K., BORSA, P., GOUDET, J., CHIKHI, L. AND BONHOMME, F. 1996-98. GENETIX, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome et Populations, CNRS UPR 9060, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier, France.
5. BERRY, R. J. 1981. Population dynamics of the house mouse. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond., 47, 395-425.
6. CAPANNA, E. AND REDI, C. A. 1994. Chromosomes and the microevolutionary processes. Boll. Zool., 61, 285-294.
7. CAPANNA, E., GROPP, A., WINKING, G., NOACK, G. AND CIVITELLI, M. V. 1976. Robertsonian metacentrics in the mouse. Chromosoma, 58, 341-353.
8. CORTI, M. AND CIABATTII, C. M. 1988. The structure of a chromosomal hybrid zone of house mice (Mus domesticus) in central Italy: cytogenetic analysis. Z. Zool. Syst. Evol.-Forsch., 28, 277-288.
9. CORTI, M. AND THORPE, R. S. 1989. Morphological clines across a karyotypic zone of house mice in central Italy. J. Evol. Biol., 2, 253-254.
10. GROPP, A., TETTENBORN, U. AND VON LEHMANN, E. 1969. Chromosomenuntersuchungen bei der Tabakmaus (M. poschiavinus) und bei den Hybriden mit der Laboratorumsmaus. Experientia, 25, 875-876.
11. HARRISON, R. G. 1990. Hybrid zones: windows on the evolutionary process. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol., 7, 69-128.
12. HAUFFE, H. C. AND SEARLE, J. B. 1998. Chromosomal heterozygosity and fertility in house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) from Northern Italy. Genetics, 150, 1143-1154.
13. HOWARD, D. J. AND WAKINGS, G. L. 1991. Topographic diversity, zone width, and the strength of reproductive isolation in a zone of overlap and hybridization. Evolution, 45, 1120-1135.
14. HSU, T. C. AND PATTON, J. L. 1969. Bone marrow preparations for chromosome studies. In: Benirschke, K. (ed.) Comparative Mammalian Cytogenetics, pp. 454-460. Springer, Berlin.
15. MANTEL, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res., 27, 209-220.
16. MOORE, W. S. AND BUCHANAN, D. B. 1985. Stability of the northern flicker hybrid zone in historical times: implications for adaptive speciation theory. Evolution, 39, 135-151.
17. PELIKÁN, J. 1981. Pattern of reproduction in the house mouse. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond., 47, 205-229.
18. POLYAKOV, A. V., CHADOVA, N. B., RODIONOVA, M. I., PANOV, V. V., DOBROTVORSKY, A. K., SEARLE, J. B. AND BORODIN, P. M. 1997. Novosibirsk revisited 24 years on: chromosome polymorphism in the Novosibirsk population of the common shrew Sorex araneus L. Heredity, 79, 172-177.
19. RAYMOND, M. AND ROUSSET, F. 1995. GENEPOP (Version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered., 86, 248-249.
20. REDI, C. A. AND CAPANNA, E. 1988. Robertsonian heterozygotes in the house mouse and the fate of their germ cells. In: Daniel, A. (ed.) The Cytogenetics of Mammalian Autosomal Rearrangements, pp. 315-359. Alan R. Liss, New York.
21. SAGE, R. D., ATCHLEY, W. R. AND CAPANNA, E. 1993. House mice as models in systematic biology. Syst. Biol, 42, 523-561.
22. SAID, K. AND BRITTON-DAVIDIAN, J. 1991. Genetic differentiation and habitat partition of Robertsonian house mouse populations (Mus musculus domesticus) of Tunisia. J. Evol. Biol., 3, 409-427.
23. SAID, K., SAAD, A., AUFFRAY, J.-C. AND BRITTON-DAVIDIAN, J. 1993. Fertility estimates in the Tunisian all-acrocentric and Robertsonian populations of the house mouse and their chromosomal hybrids. Heredity, 71, 532-538.
24. SEABRIGHT, M. A. 1971. A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet, 2, 971-972.
25. SEARLE, J. B., NAVARRO, Y. N. AND GANEM, G. 1993. Further studies of a staggered hybrid zone in Mus musculus domesticus. Heredity, 71, 523-531.
26. SLATKIN, M. 1993. Isolation by distance in equilibrium and non-equilibrium populations. Evolution, 35, 477-488.
27. SPIRITO, F., MODESTI, A., PERTICONE, P., CRISTALDI, M., FEDERICI, R. AND RIZZONI, M. 1980. Mechanisms of fixation and accumulation of centric fusions in natural populations of Mus musculus L. I. Karyological analysis of an hybrid zone between two populations in the central Apennines. Evolution, 34, 453-466.
28. STANYON, R. AND GALLENI, L. 1991. A rapid fibroblast culture technique for high resolution karyotypes. Boll. Zool., 58, 81-83.
29. TOMASELLI, R., BALDUZZI, A. AND FILIPELLO, S. 1973. Carta Bioclimatica D'italia. Ministero Agricoltura e Foreste, Roma.
30. WEIR, B. S. AND COCKERHAM, C. C. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38, 1358-1370.