Presentation of similar images as a reference for distinction between benign and malignant masses on mammograms: Analysis of initial observer study

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 592-602

  Muramatsu, Chisako ^a,b   Schmidt, Robert A ^a   Shiraishi, Junji ^a   Li, Qiang ^a,c   Doi, Kunio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b GIFU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

breast masses; computer aided diagnosis; mammograms; Similar images

Indexed keywords

BEFORE AND AFTER; BENEFICIAL EFFECTS; BREAST IMAGING; BREAST MASS; COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS SYSTEM; CONFIDENCE LEVELS; DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS; DIGITAL DATABASE FOR SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHIES; MALIGNANT MASS; MAMMOGRAMS; OBSERVER PERFORMANCE STUDY; OBSERVER STUDIES; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES; REFERENCE DATABASE; SIMILAR IMAGE; SIMILARITY MEASURE;

MAMMOGRAPHY; X RAY SCREENS;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER TERMINAL; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER TERMINALS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ROC CURVE;

EID: 77957868729     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: 1618727X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-009-9263-z     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. FM Hall JM Storella DZ Silverstone G Wyshak 1988 Nonpalpable breast lesions: Recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography Radiology 167 353 358 1:STN:280:DyaL1c7ptVeltw%3D%3D 3282256
2. DB Kopans RH Moore KA McCarthy DA Hall CA Hulka GJ Whitman PJ Slanetz EF Halpern 1996 Positive predictive value of breast biopsy performed as a result of mammography: There is no abrupt change at age 50 years Radiology 200 357 360 1:STN:280:DyaK283psVGltQ%3D%3D 8685325
3. EA Sickles DL Miglioretti R Ballard-Barbash BM Geller JWT Leung RD Rosenberg R Smith-Bingman BC Yankaskas 2005 Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography Radiology 235 775 790 10.1148/radiol.2353040738 15914475 (Pubitemid 40695870)
4. HP Chan B Sahiner MA Roubidoux TE Wilson DD Akler C Paramagul JS Newman S Sanjay-Gopal 1999 Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: An ROC study Radiology 212 817 827 1:STN:280:DyaK1MvgslKqsg%3D%3D 10478252
5. Y Jiang RM Nishikawa RA Schmidt CE Metz ML Giger K Doi 1999 Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis Acad Radiol 6 22 33 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7gvVaqug%3D%3D 10.1016/S1076-6332(99)80058-0 9891149 (Pubitemid 29061477)
6. K Doi 2005 Current status and future potential of computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging Br J Radiol 78 S3 S19 10.1259/bjr/82933343 15917443 (Pubitemid 40932502)
7. K Doi 2007 Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: Historical review, current status and future potential Comput Med Imaging Graph 31 198 211 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2007.02.002 17349778 (Pubitemid 46601790)
8. K Doi 2007 Computer-aided diagnosis moves from breast to other systems Diagnostic Imaging 29 37 40
9. Muramatsu C: Investigation of similarity measures for selection of similar images in computer-aided diagnosis of breast lesions on mammograms. (Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL) Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest/UMI, 2008
10. S Kumazawa C Muramatsu Q Li F Li J Shiraishi P Caligiuri RA Schmidt H MacMahon K Doi 2008 An investigation of radiologists' perception of lesion similarity: Observations with paired breast masses on mammograms and paired lung nodules on CT images Acad Radiol 15 887 894 10.1016/j.acra.2008.01.012 18572125 (Pubitemid 352033543)
11. HA Swett PR Fisher AI Cohn PL Miller PG Mutalik 1989 Expert system-controlled image display Radiology 172 487 493 1:STN:280: DyaL1Mzhs1ehtw%3D%3D 2664871
12. AM Aisen LS Broderick H Winer-Muram CE Brodley AC Kak C Pavlopoulou J Dy CR Shyu A Marchiori 2003 Automated storage and retrieval of thin-section CT images to assist diagnosis: System description and preliminary assessment Radiology 228 265 270 10.1148/radiol.2281020126 12832587 (Pubitemid 36736102)
13. Q Li F Li J Shiraishi S Katsuragawa S Sone K Doi 2003 Investigation of new psychophysical measures for evaluation of similar images on thoracic CT for distinction between benign and malignant nodules Med Phys 30 2584 2593 10.1118/1.1605351 14596294 (Pubitemid 37266755)
14. J Sklansky EY Tao M Bazargan CJ Ornes RC Murchison S Teklehaimanot 2000 Computer-aided, case-based diagnosis of mammographic regions of interest containing microcalcifications Acad Radiol 7 395 405 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3cvlsF2hsg%3D%3D 10.1016/S1076-6332(00)80379-7 10845398
15. ML Giger Z Huo CJ Vyborny L Lan I Bonta K Horsch RM Nishikawa I Rosenbourgh 2002 Intelligent CAD workstation for breast imaging using similarity 167 to known lesions and multiple visual prompt aids Proc SPIE 4684 768 773 10.1117/12.467222 (Pubitemid 35237315)
16. I El-Naqa Y Yang NP Galatsanos RM Nishikawa MN Wernick 2004 A similarity learning approach to content-based image retrieval: Application to digital mammography IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23 1233 1244 10.1109/TMI.2004.834601 15493691
17. B Zheng A Lu LA Hardesty JH Sumkin CM Hakim MA Ganott D Gur 2006 A method to improve visual similarity of breast masses for an interactive computer-aided diagnosis environment Med Phys 33 111 117 10.1118/1.2143139 16485416 (Pubitemid 43121039)
18. K Horsch ML Giger CJ Vyborny L Lan EB Mendelson ER Hendrick 2006 Classification of breast lesions with multimodality computer-aided diagnosis: Observer study results on an independent clinical data set Radiology 240 357 368 10.1148/radiol.2401050208 16864666 (Pubitemid 44098631)
19. C Muramatsu Q Li K Suzuki RA Schmidt J Shiraishi G Newstead K Doi 2005 Investigation of psychophysical measure for evaluation of similar images for mammographic masses: Preliminary results Med Phys 32 2295 2304 10.1118/1.1944913 16121585 (Pubitemid 41023188)
20. Muramatasu C, Li Q, Schmidt RA, Shiraishi J, Suzuki K, Newstead G, Doi K: Determination of subjective and objective similarity for pairs of masses on mammograms for selection of similar images. Proc SPIE 65141I 1-65141I 9, 2007
21. C Muramatsu Q Li RA Schmidt J Shiraishi K Doi 2009 Determination of similarity measures for pairs of mass lesions on mammograms by use of BI-RADS lesion descriptors and image features Acad Radiol 16 443 449 10.1016/j.acra.2008.10.012 19268856
22. Heath M, Bowyer K, Kopans D, Moore R, Kegelmeyer P: Current states of the digital database for screening mammography. Digital mammography, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998
23. University of South Florida. Available at http://marathon.csee.usf.edu/ Mammography/Database.html.
24. DD Dorfman KS Berbaum CE Metz 1992 Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method Invest Radiol 27 723 731 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FhsVOksg%3D%3D 10.1097/00004424-199209000-00015 1399456
25. PC Stomper SP Davis N Weidner JE Meyer 1988 Clinically occult, noncalcified breast cancer: serial radiologic-pathologic correlation in 27 cases Radiology 169 621 626 1:STN:280:DyaL1M%2Fkt1Oruw%3D%3D 2847231
26. M Moskowitz 1983 The predictive value of certain mammographic signs in screening for breast cancer Cancer 51 1007 1011 1:STN:280:DyaL3s7gt1yitA%3D%3D 10.1002/1097-0142(19830315)51:6<1007::AID-CNCR2820510607>3.0.CO;2-P 6821864 (Pubitemid 13158789)
27. Z Huo ML Giger CJ Vyborny CE Metz 2002 Breast cancer: Effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis-observer study with independent database of mammograms Radiology 224 560 568 10.1148/radiol.2242010703 12147857
28. SA Feig EA Sickles WP Evans MN Linver 2004 Re: Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system J Natl Cancer Inst 96 1260 1261 10.1093/jnci/djh257 15316065 (Pubitemid 39232719)