Determination of Similarity Measures for Pairs of Mass Lesions on Mammograms by Use of BI-RADS Lesion Descriptors and Image Features

Academic Radiology

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 443-449

  Muramatsu, Chisako ^a   Li, Qiang ^a   Schmidt, Robert A ^a   Shiraishi, Junji ^a   Doi, Kunio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

breast mass; computer aided diagnosis; mammograms; Similar images

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 61649099665     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.10.012     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2008. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/STT/content/STT_1x_Cancer_Facts_and_Figure s_2008.asp?from=fast. Accessed August 6, 2008.
2. Hall F.M., Storella J.M., Silverstone D.Z., et al. Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography. Radiology 167 (1988) 353-358
3. Kopans D.B., Moore R.H., McCarthy K.A., et al. Positive predictive value of breast biopsy performed as a result of mammography: there is no abrupt change at age 50 years. Radiology 200 (1996) 357-360
4. Sickles E.A., Miglioretti D.L., Ballard-Barbash R., et al. Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. Radiology 235 (2005) 775-790
5. Chan H.P., Sahiner B., Roubidoux M.A., et al. Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. Radiology 212 (1999) 817-827
6. Huo Z., Giger M.L., Vyborny C.J., et al. Breast cancer: effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis-observer study with independent database of mammograms. Radiology 224 (2002) 560-568
7. Jiang Y., Nishikawa R.M., Schmidt R.A., et al. Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radiol 6 (1999) 22-33
8. Doi K. Current status and future potential of computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging. Br J Radiol 78 (2005) S3-S19
9. Doi K. Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential. Comput Med Imaging Graph 31 (2007) 198-211
10. Muramatsu C. Investigation of similarity measures for selection of similar images in computer-aided diagnosis of breast lesions on mammograms. PhD dissertation, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest/UMI (2008)
11. Horsch K., Giger M.L., Vyborny C.J., et al. Classification of breast lesions with multimodality computer-aided diagnosis: observer study results on an independent clinical data set. Radiology 240 (2006) 357-368
12. Li Q., Li F., Shiraishi J., et al. Investigation of new psychophysical measures for evaluation of similar images on thoracic CT for distinction between benign and malignant nodules. Med Phys 30 (2003) 2584-2593
13. Qi H., and Snyder W.E. Content-based image retrieval in picture archiving and communications systems. J Digit Imaging 11 (1998) 65-73
14. Sklansky J., Tao E.Y., Bazargan M., et al. Computer-aided case-based diagnosis of mammographic regions of interest containing microcalcifications. Acad Radiol 7 (2000) 395-405
15. Giger M.L., Huo Z., Vyborny C.J., et al. Intelligent CAD workstation for breast imaging using similarity to known lesions and multiple visual prompt aids. Proc SPIE 4684 (2002) 768-773
16. Aisen A.M., Broderick L.S., Winer-Muram H., et al. Automated storage and retrieval of thin-section CT images to assist diagnosis: system description and preliminary assessment. Radiology 228 (2003) 265-270
17. Kawata Y., Niki N., Ohmatsu, et al. Example-based assisting approach for pulmonary nodule classification in three-dimensional thoracic computed tomography images. Acad Radiol 10 (2003) 1402-1415
18. Muramatsu C., Li Q., Suzuki K., et al. Investigation of psychophysical measure for evaluation of similar images for mammographic masses: preliminary results. Med Phys 32 (2005) 2295-2304
19. Nishikawa R.M., Yang Y., Huo D., et al. Observers' ability to judge the similarity of clustered calcifications on mammograms. Proc SPIE 5372 (2004) 192-198
20. Muramatsu C., Li Q., Schmidt R.A., et al. Experimental determination of subjective similarity for pairs of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: observer study results. Med Phys 33 (2006) 3460-3468
21. Muramatsu C., Li Q., and Schmidt R.A. Determination of subjective similarity for pairs of masses and pairs of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: comparison of similarity ranking scores and absolute similarity ratings. Med Phys 34 (2007) 2890-2895
22. Zheng B., Lu A., Hardesty L.A., et al. A method to improve visual similarity of breast masses for an interactive computer-aided diagnosis environment. Med Phys 33 (2006) 111-117
23. Kumazawa S., Muramatsu C., Li Q., et al. An investigation of radiologists' perception of lesion similarity: observations with paired breast masses on mammograms and paired lung nodules on CT images. Acad Radiol 15 (2008) 887-894
24. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS). 4th ed. (2003), American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
25. Baker J.A., Kornguth P.J., Lo J.Y., et al. Breast cancer: prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon. Radiology 196 (1995) 817-822
26. Heath M., Bowyer K., Kopans D., et al. The digital database for screening mammography. In: Yaffe M.J. (Ed). Proceedings of the fifth international workshop on digital mammography (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland 212-218
27. Aoyama M., Li Q., Katsuragawa S., et al. Computerized scheme for determination of the likelihood measure of malignancy for pulmonary nodules on low-dose CT images. Med Phys 30 (2003) 387-394
28. Huo Z., Giger M.L., Vyborny C.J., et al. Analysis of spiculation in the computerized classification of mammographic masses. Med Phys 22 (1995) 1569-1579