Management of biopsy needle artifacts: Techniques for RF-refocused MRI

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 586-595

  Butts, Kim ^a   Pauly, John M ^a   Daniel, Bruce L ^a   Kee, Stephen ^a   Norbash, Alexander M ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Distortion; Interventional MRI; MR guided biopsy; Needle artifacts

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BIOPSY; LIVER BIOPSY; NEEDLE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOFREQUENCY;

ARTIFACTS; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEEDLES; PHANTOMS, IMAGING;

EID: 0032941808     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199904)9:4<586::AID-JMRI13>3.0.CO;2-X     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Schenck J. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 1996;23:815-850.
2. Lewin J, Duerk J, Jain V, et al. Needle localization in MR-guided biopsy and aspiration: effects of field strength, sequence design, and magnetic field orientation. AJR 1996;166:1337-1345.
3. Ladd M, Erhart P, Debatin J, et al. Biopsy needle susceptibility artifacts. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:646-651.
4. Silverman SG, Collick BD, Figueira MR, et al. Interactive MR-guided biopsy in an open-configuration MR imaging system. Radiology 1995;197:175-81.
5. Mueller P, Stark D, Simeone, et al. MR-guided aspiration biopsy: needle design and clinical trials. Radiology 1986;161:605-609.
6. Lufkin R, Teresi L, Hanafee W. New needle for MR-guided aspiration cytology of the head and neck. AJR 1987;149:380-382.
7. Lufkin R, Teresi L, Chiu L, Hanafee W. A technique for MR-guided needle placement. AJR 1988;151:193-196.
8. Mueller P, Stark D, Simeone J. Clinical use of a nonferromagnetic needle for magnetic resonance-guided biopsy. Gastrointest Radiol 1989;14:61-64.
9. Gehl H, Frahm C, Melchert U, Weiss H. Suitability of different MR-compatible needles and magnet designs for MR-guided puntures. In: Proceedings of the SMR, 3rd Annual Meeting, 1995.
10. Lenz G, Dewey C. Titanium alloy needles for interventional MRI procedures. In: Proceedings of the SMR 3rd Annual Meeting. 1995.
11. Arbogast-Ravier S, Gangi A, Choquet P, et al. An in vitro study at low field for MR guidance of a biopsy needle. Magn Reson Imaging 1995;13:321-4.
12. Ladd M, Erhart P, Debatin J, et al. Biopsy needle susceptibility artifacts. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:646-651.
13. Daniel B, Ikeda D, Glover G, Herfkens R. Interactive MR-guided breast lesion localization-a phantom study. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Meeting, New York, 1996.
14. Frahm C, Gehl H, Melchert U, Weiss H. Visualization of magnetic resonance-compatible needles at 1.5 and 0.2 Tesla. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1996;19:335-340.
15. Liu H, Martin A, Truwit C. Interventional MRI at high-field (1.5T): needle artifacts. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:214-219.
16. Cho Z, Kim D, Kim Y. Total inhomogeneity correction including chemical shifts and susceptibility by view angle tilting. Med Phys 1988;15:7-11.
17. McGowan A, MacKay A, Xiang Q, et al. Reduction of image distortion in the presence of metal. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Meeting, Vancouver, 1997.