The time it takes to switch attention

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 647-653

  Logan, Gordon D ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 31044451634     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196753     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. AWH, E., JONIDES, J., & REUTER-LORENZ, P. A. (1998). Rehearsal in spatial working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 780-790.
2. AWH, E., & PASHLER, H. (2000). Evidence for split attentional foci. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 834-846.
3. BUNDESEN, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523-547.
4. COLEGATE, R. L., HUFFMAN, J. E., & ERIKSEN, C. W. (1973). Selective encoding from multielement visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 217-224.
5. COWAN, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 87-185.
6. ERIKSEN, C. W., & COLLINS, J. F. (1969). Temporal course of selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 254-261.
7. ERIKSEN, C. W., & HUFFMAN, J. E. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 201-204.
8. KRAMER, A. F., & HAHN, S. (1995). Splitting the beam: Distribution of attention over noncontiguous regions of the visual field. Psychological Science, 6, 381-386.
9. LOGAN, G. D. (2002). An instance theory of attention and memory. Psychological Review, 109, 376-400.
10. LOGAN, G. D., & BUNDESEN, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 575-599.
11. LOGAN, G. D., & BUNDESEN, C. (2004). Very clever homunculus: Compound stimulus strategies for the explicit task-cuing procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 832-840.
12. LOGAN, G. D., & GORDON, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393-434.
13. MAYR, U., & KLIEGL, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 362-372.
14. MOORE, C. M., EGETH, H., BERGLAN, L. R., & LUCK, S. J. (1996). Are attentional dwell times inconsistent with serial visual search? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 360-365.
15. PYLYSHYN, Z. (1989). The role of location indices in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model. Spatial Vision, 3, 179-197.
16. SPERLING, G., & WEICHSELGARTNER, E. (1995). Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention. Psychological Review, 102, 503-532.
17. TOWNSEND, J. T. (1990). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychological Science, 1, 46-54.
18. TREISMAN, A. (1982). Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 8, 194-214.
19. TSAL, Y. (1983). Movements of attention across the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 523-530.
20. WARD, R., DUNCAN, J., & SHAPIRO, K. (1996). The slow time-course of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 79-109.
21. WOLFE, J. (1998). What can 1,000,000 trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science, 9, 33-39.