Outcome analysis for women undergoing annual versus biennial screening mammography: A review of 24,211 examinations

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 173, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 285-289

  Hunt, Karen A ^a,b   Rosen, Eric L ^a,c   Sickles, Edward A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SIZE; CANCER STAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; REVIEW;

EID: 0032811791     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.173.2.10430120     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Hendrick RE, Smith RA, Rutledge JH III, Smart CR. Benefit of screening mammography in women age 40-49: a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 1997;22:87-92
2. Smart CR, Hendrick RE, Rutledge JH III, Smith RA. Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40-49 years: current evidence from randomized control trials. Cancer 1995;75:1619-1626 (erratum: Cancer 1995;75:2788)
3. Nystrom L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S, et al. Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomized trials. Lancet 1993;341:973-978
4. Bjurstam N, Bjorneld L, Duffy SW, et al. The Gothenberg Breast Screening Trial. Cancer 1997; 80:2091-2099
5. Feig SA. Increased benefit from shorter screening mammography intervals in women ages 40-49 years. Cancer 1997;80:2035-2039
6. Sickles EA. Breast cancer screening outcomes in women ages 40-49: clinical experience with service screening using modern mammography. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 1997;22:99-104
7. Tabár L, Fagerberg G, Chen H, et al. Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age: new results from the Swedish Two-County Trial. Cancer 1995;75: 2507-2517
8. Van Dijck JA, Verbeek AL, Beex LV, et al. Mammographic screening after the age of 65 years: evidence for a reduction in breast cancer mortality. Int J Cancer 1996;66:727-731
9. Lindfors KK, Rosenquist CJ. The cost-effectiveness of mammographic screening strategies. JAMA 1995; 274:881-884
10. Shapiro S. Screening: assessment of current studies. Cancer 1994;74:231-238
11. Faulk RM, Sickles EA, Sollitto RA, Ominsky SH, Galvin HB, Frankel SD. Clinical efficacy of mammographic screening in the elderly. Radiology 1995;194:193-197
12. Seidman H, Gelb SWK, Silverberg E, La Verda N, Lubera JA. Survival experience in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project. CA Cancer J Clin 1987;37:258-290
13. Tabár L, Faberberg G, Day NE, Holmberg L. What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish Two-County Breast Screening Trial. Br J Cancer 1987;55:547-551
14. Moskowitz M. Breast cancer: age-specific growth rates and screening strategies. Radiology 1986;161: 37-41
15. Field LR, Wilson TE, Strawderman M, Gabriel H, Helvie MA. Mammographic screening in women more than 64 years old: a comparison of 1- and 2-year intervals. AJR 1998;170:961-965
16. Sickles EA, Weber WN, Galvin HB, Ominsky SH, Sollitto RA. Mammographic screening: how to operate successfully at low cost. Radiology 1986; 160:95-97
17. Sickles EA. The use of computers in mammography screening. Radiol Clin North Am 1987;25:1015-1029
18. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 1996;276:33-38
19. Sickles EA. RSNA categorical course in breast imaging: auditing your practice. Oak Brook, IL: Radiological Society of North America, 1995:81-91
20. DeGroote R, Rush BF Jr, Milazzo J, Warden MJ, Rocko JM. Interval breast cancer: a more aggressive subset of breast neoplasias. Surgery 1983;94: 543-547
21. Kopans DB, Moore RH, McCarthy KA, et al. Positive predictive value of breast biopsy performed as a result of mammography: there is no abrupt change at age 50 years. Radiology 1996;200:357-360
22. Linver MN, Paster SB. Mammography outcomes in a practice setting by age: prognostic factors, sensitivity, and positive biopsy rate. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 1997;22:113-117
23. Hosek RS, Flanders WD, Sasko AJ. Bias in case control studies of screening effectiveness. Am J Epidemiol 1996;143:193-201