Long-term risk of false-positive screening results and subsequent biopsy as a function of mammography use

Radiology

Volumn 240, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 333-342

  Blanchard, Karen ^a   Colbert, James A ^a   Kopans, Daniel B ^a,b   Moore, Richard ^a   Halpern, Elkan F ^a,b   Hughes, Kevin S ^a,b   Smith, Barbara L ^a,b   Tanabe, Kenneth K ^a,b   Michaelson, James S ^a,b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; ADULT; BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK; STANDARD;

ADULT; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK;

EID: 33746220436     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2402050107     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:347-360.
2. Kopans DB. Updated results of the trials of screening mammography. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 1997;6:233-263.
3. Smith RA. Screening fundamentals. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1997;22:15-19.
4. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, Polk S, Arena PJ, Fletcher SW. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1089-1096.
5. Christiansen CL, Wang F, Barton MB, et al. Predicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammograms. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1657-1666.
6. Fletcher SW, Elmore JG. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1672-1680.
7. Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Miglioretti DL, et al. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom. JAMA 2003;290:2129-2137.
8. Brown ML, Hiun F, Sickles EA, Kessler LG. Screening mammography in community practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:1373-1377.
9. Lidbrink E, Elfving J, Jonsson E. Neglected aspects of false positive findings of mammography in breast cancer screening: analysis of false positive cases from the Stockholm trial. BMJ 1996;312:273-275.
10. Barton MB, Moore S, Polk S, Shtatland E, Elmore JG, Fletcher SW. Increased patient concern after false-positive mammograms: clinician documentation and subsequent ambulatory visits. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:150-156.
11. Lampic C, Thurfjell E, Bergh J, Sjoden PO. Short- and long-term anxiety and depression in women recalled after breast cancer screening. Eur J Cancer 2001;37:463-469.
12. Gilbert FJ, Cordiner CM, Zeck RA, Hood DB, Mathieson D, Walker LG. Breast screening: the psychological sequelae of false-positive recall in women with and without a family history of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:2010-2014.
13. Callaway MP, Boggis CR, Astley SA, Hutt I. The influence of previous films on screening mammographic interpretation and detection of breast carcinoma. Clin Radiol 1997;52:527-329.
14. Sickles EA. Successful methods to reduce false-positive mammography interpretations. Radiol Clin North Am 2000;38:693-700.
15. Burnside ES, Sickles EA, Sohlich RE, Dee KE. Differential value of comparison with previous examinations versus screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1173-1177.
16. Esserman L, Cowley H, Eberle C, et al. Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:369-375.
17. Elmore JG, Miglioretti DL, Reisch LM, et al. Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false positive rates. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1373-1380.
18. Ulcickas Yood M, McCarthy BD, Lee NC, Jacobsen G, Johnson CC. Patterns and characteristics of repeat mammography among women 50 years and older. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:595-599.
19. Sabogal F, Merrill SS, Packel L. Mammography rescreening among older California women. Health Care Financ Rev 2001;22:63-75.
20. Michaelson J, Satija S, Moore R, et al. The pattern of breast cancer screening utilization and its consequences. Cancer 2002;94:37-43.
21. Blanchard K, Colbert JA, Puri D, et al. Mammographic screening: patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival. Cancer 2004;101(3):495-507.
22. Michaelson JS, Satija S, Moore R, Weber G, Garland G, Kopans DB. Properties of the invasive breast cancers and features of screening utilization seen over the last decade at the Massachusetts General Hospital Breast Imaging Division. J Womens Imaging 2001;3:99-104.
23. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Fowler FJ, Welch HG. Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. JAMA 2004;291:71-78.
24. Michaelson JS, Kopans DB, Cady B. The breast cancer screening interval is important. Cancer 2000;88:1282-1284.
25. Michaelson JS, Halpern E, Kopans D. A computer simulation method for estimating the optimal intervals for breast cancer screening. Radiology 1999;212:551-560.
26. Michaelson JS. Using information on breast cancer growth, spread, and detectability to find the best ways to use screening to reduce breast cancer death. J Womens Imaging 2001;3:54-57.
27. Michaelson JS, Satija S, Moore R, et al. Estimates of the sizes at which breast cancers become detectable on mammographic and on clinical grounds. J Womens Imaging 2003;5:3-10.
28. Michaelson JS, Satija S, Moore R, Weber G, Garland G, Kopans DB. Estimates of the breast cancer growth rate and sojourn time from screening database information. J Womens Imaging 2003;5:11-19.
29. Michaelson JS, Silverstein M, Wyatt J, et al. The prediction of breast cancer survival from tumor size. Cancer 2002;95:713-723.
30. Tabar L, Duffy SW, Vitak B, Chen HH, Prevost TC. The natural history of breast carcinoma: what have we learned from screening? Cancer 1999;86:449-462.
31. Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1081-1087.