Can common adhesion molecules and microtopography affect cellular elasticity? A combined atomic force microscopy and optical study

Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing

Volumn 48, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1043-1053

  McPhee, Gordon ^a   Dalby, Matthew J ^a   Riehle, Mathis ^a   Yin, Huabing ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

AFM; Cellular elasticity; Fibroblasts; Indentation; Topography

Indexed keywords

ADHESION MOLECULES; AFM; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; BIOMEDICAL DEVICES; CELL ELASTICITY; CELL FUNCTIONS; CELLULAR ELASTICITY; COATED SURFACE; COMMONLY USED; CYTOSKELETONS; DATA FITTINGS; IN-VITRO; INDENTATION DEPTH; LIFE SCIENCE RESEARCH; MATRIX PROTEINS; MICRO TOPOGRAPHY; OPERATIONAL FACTORS; OPTICAL STUDY; POLY-L-LYSINE; RIGOROUS APPROACH; STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE; TISSUE CULTURE PLASTICS;

ADHESION; AMINO ACIDS; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMECHANICS; ELASTICITY; FIBROBLASTS; FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS; GROWTH KINETICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TISSUE; TISSUE CULTURE; TOPOGRAPHY;

CELL CULTURE;

CELL ADHESION MOLECULE;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CELL CULTURE; CELL SHAPE; DRUG EFFECT; ELASTICITY; FIBROBLAST; HUMAN; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

CELL ADHESION MOLECULES; CELL SHAPE; CELLS, CULTURED; ELASTICITY; FIBROBLASTS; HUMANS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 77957765211     PISSN: 01400118     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-010-0657-3     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. E A-Hassan, et al. 1998 Relative microelastic mapping of living cells by atomic force microscopy Biophys J 74 3 1564 1578 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXis1amtb4%3D 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77868-3 9512052
2. TK Berdyyeva CD Woodworth I Sokolov 2005 Human epithelial cells increase their rigidity with ageing in vitro: direct measurements Phys Med Biol 50 1 81 92 10.1088/0031-9155/50/1/007 15715424 (Pubitemid 40185402)
3. K Burridge M ChrzanowskaWodnicka 1996 Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 12 463 518 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XnsFCltrc%3D 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.463 8970735 (Pubitemid 26422722)
4. HJ Butt B Cappella M Kappl 2005 Force measurements with the atomic force microscope: technique, interpretation and applications Surf Sci Rep 59 1-6 1 152 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXht1ahsrrK 10.1016/j.surfrep.2005.08.003 (Pubitemid 41594664)
5. CS Chen, et al. 1997 Geometric control of cell life and death Science 276 5317 1425 1428 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXjsFOhu7s%3D 10.1126/science.276.5317.1425 9162012 (Pubitemid 27235413)
6. CS Chen, et al. 2003 Cell shape provides global control of focal adhesion assembly Biochem Biophys Res Commun 307 2 355 361 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD3sXlt1arur8%3D 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)01165-3 12859964 (Pubitemid 36818878)
7. P Clark, et al. 1990 Topographical control of cell behavior. 2. multiple grooved substrate Development 108 4 635 644 1:STN:280:DyaK3czltlWrtw%3D%3D 2387239
8. KD Costa FCP Yin 1999 Analysis of indentation: Implications for measuring mechanical properties with atomic force microscopy J Biomech Eng Trans ASME 121 5 462 471 1:STN:280:DyaK1MvlvFCksg%3D%3D 10.1115/1.2835074
9. SE Cross, et al. 2007 Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients Nat Nanotechnol 2 12 780 783 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtlyktL7L 10.1038/nnano.2007.388 18654431 (Pubitemid 350223349)
10. A Curtis C Wilkinson 1997 Topographical control of cells Biomaterials 18 24 1573 1583 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXivFCru7Y%3D 10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00144-0 9613804 (Pubitemid 28185057)
11. MJ Dalby 2005 Topographically induced direct cell mechanotransduction Med Eng Phys 27 9 730 742 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.04.005 15921949 (Pubitemid 41318121)
12. EM Darling, et al. 2008 Viscoelastic properties of human mesenchymally-derived stem cells and primary osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes J Biomech 41 2 454 464 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.06.019 17825308
13. D Discher, et al. 2009 Biomechanics: cell research and applications for the next decade Annu Biomed Eng 37 5 847 859 10.1007/s10439-009-9661-x
14. I Dulinska, et al. 2006 Stiffness of normal and pathological erythrocytes studied by means of atomic force microscopy J Biochem Biophys Methods 66 1-3 1 11 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhsFKrs7g%3D 10.1016/j.jbbm.2005.11.003 16443279 (Pubitemid 43254623)
15. AJ Engler, et al. 2006 Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification Cell 126 4 677 689 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xpt1aktbg%3D 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 16923388 (Pubitemid 44233625)
16. AJ Engler, et al. 2008 Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a matrix with heart-like elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating J Cell Sci 121 22 3794 3802 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsFaktLjO 10.1242/jcs.029678 18957515
17. B Fabry, et al. 2001 Signal transduction in smooth muscle-selected contribution: time course and heterogeneity of contractile responses in cultured human airway smooth muscle cells J Appl Physiol 91 2 986 994 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mvgs1ejtw%3D%3D 11457818
18. H Faulstich H Trischmann D Mayer 1983 Preparation of tetramethylrhodaminyl-phalloidin and uptake of the toxin into short-term cultured-hepatocytes by endocytosis Exp Cell Res 144 1 73 82 1:CAS:528:DyaL3sXktFOktLo%3D 10.1016/0014-4827(83)90443-3 6840214
19. A Folch M Toner 2000 Microengineering of cellular interactions Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2 227 235 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXnsVaktb4%3D 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.2.1. 227 11701512
20. J Guck, et al. 2005 Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence Biophys J 88 5 3689 3698 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXktFSgs7k%3D 10.1529/biophysj.104.045476 15722433 (Pubitemid 40586616)
21. F Guilak, et al. 2009 Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix Cell Stem Cell 5 1 17 26 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD1MXoslKgs7k%3D 10.1016/j.stem.2009.06.016 19570510
22. RM Hochmuth 2000 Micropipette aspiration of living cells J Biomech 33 1 15 22 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FnsFKjtw%3D%3D 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00175-X 10609514
23. Ingber DE et al (1994) Celluar tensegrity-exploring how mechanical changes in the cytoskeleton regulate cell-growth, migration, and tissue pattern during morphogenesis. In: International review of cytology-a survey of cell biology, vol 150. Academic Press Inc, San Diego, pp 173-224
24. PA Janmey 1998 The cytoskeleton and cell signaling: component localization and mechanical coupling Physiol Rev 78 3 763 781 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXltFGmtrY%3D 9674694
25. PA Janmey CA McCulloch 2007 Cell mechanics: integrating cell responses to mechanical stimuli Annu Rev Biomed Eng 9 1 34 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtVehtLnE 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.060906.151927 17461730 (Pubitemid 350252899)
26. RH Kramer XD Shen H Zhou 2005 Tumor cell invasion and survival in head and neck cancer Cancer Metastasis Rev 24 1 35 45 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXisV2kt78%3D 10.1007/s10555-005-5046-2 15785871 (Pubitemid 40576062)
27. TG Kuznetsova, et al. 2007 Atomic force microscopy probing of cell elasticity Micron 38 8 824 833 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFOjsbbJ 10.1016/j.micron. 2007.06.011 17709250 (Pubitemid 47554622)
28. QS Li, et al. 2008 AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells Biochem Biophys Res Commun 374 4 609 613 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtVamu7fO 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.07.078 18656442
29. SC Lieber, et al. 2004 Aging increases stiffness of cardiac myocytes measured by atomic force microscopy nanoindentation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 287 2 H645 H651 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXmvFaksrc%3D 10.1152/ajpheart.00564. 2003 15044193 (Pubitemid 38955295)
30. JW Lussi, et al. 2006 Pattern stability under cell culture conditions-a comparative study of patterning methods based on PLL-g-PEG background passivation Biomaterials 27 12 2534 2541 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xls1WitA%3D%3D 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.027 16364431 (Pubitemid 43113278)
31. RE Mahaffy, et al. 2004 Quantitative analysis of the viscoelastic properties of thin regions of fibroblasts using atomic force microscopy Biophys J 86 3 1777 1793 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXis1SjsLg%3D 10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74245-9 14990504
32. AB Mathur, et al. 2001 Endothelial, cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle exhibit different viscous and elastic properties as determined by atomic force microscopy J Biomech 34 12 1545 1553 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FivVKktg%3D%3D 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00149-X 11716856
33. JR Moffitt, et al. 2008 Recent advances in optical tweezers Annu Rev Biochem 77 205 228 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXos1ektbk%3D 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77. 043007.090225 18307407
34. JD Pajerowski, et al. 2007 Physical plasticity of the nucleus in stem cell differentiation Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104 40 15619 15624 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFGnsrfI 10.1073/pnas.0702576104 17893336
35. KK Parker, et al. 2002 Directional control of lamellipodia extension by constraining cell shape and orienting cell tractional forces FASEB J 16 10 10 10.1096/fj.02-0038com
36. MJ Paszek, et al. 2005 Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype Cancer Cell 8 3 241 254 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtV2gt7vO 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.08.010 16169468
37. M Radmacher 1997 Measuring the elastic properties of biological samples with the AFM IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 16 2 47 57 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3ktV2gtA%3D%3D 10.1109/51.582176 9086372
38. MJ Rosenbluth WA Lam DA Fletcher 2006 Force microscopy of nonadherent cells: a comparison of leukemia cell deformability Biophys J 90 8 2994 3003 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XjsFequ78%3D 10.1529/biophysj.105.067496 16443660
39. C Rotsch M Radmacher 2000 Drug-induced changes of cytoskeletal structure and mechanics in fibroblasts: an atomic force microscopy study Biophys J 78 1 520 535 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXktFCjtw%3D%3D 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76614-8 10620315
40. BA Smith, et al. 2005 Probing the viscoelastic behavior of cultured airway smooth muscle cells with atomic force microscopy: Stiffening induced by contractile agonist Biophys J 88 4 2994 3007 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXjtFCjtb4%3D 10.1529/biophysj.104.046649 15665124
41. A Sørensen, et al. 2007 Long-term neurite orientation on astrocyte monolayers aligned by microtopography Biomaterials 28 36 5498 5508 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.034 17905429
42. E Takai, et al. 2005 Osteoblast elastic modulus measured by atomic force microscopy is substrate dependent Annu Biomed Eng 33 7 963 971 10.1007/s10439-005-3555-3
43. NJ Tao SM Lindsay S Lees 1992 Measuring the microelastic properties of biological-material Biophys J 63 4 1165 1169 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2Fkt1Onsg%3D%3D 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81692-2 1420932
44. N Wang, et al. 2002 Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 282 3 C606 C616 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xit1Giur4%3D 11832346
45. MJ Wozniak, et al. 2009 Monitoring of mechanical properties of serially passaged bovine articular chondrocytes by atomic force microscopy Micron 40 8 870 875 10.1016/j.micron.2009.06.002 19595604
46. Yim EKF et al (2010) Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 31(6):1299-1306
47. LMY Yu ND Leipzig MS Shoichet 2008 Promoting neuron adhesion and growth Mater Today 11 5 36 43 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXmvVeqsL4%3D 10.1016/S1369-7021(08) 70088-9