Effectiveness of a computer-aided neuroanatomy program for entry-level physical therapy students: Anatomy and clinical examination of the dorsal column-medial lemniscal system

Journal of Allied Health

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 156-164

  McKeough, D Michael ^a   Mattern Baxter, Katrin ^b   Barakatt, Edward ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL MEDICINE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; NEUROANATOMY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; SPINAL CORD; TEACHING;

CLINICAL MEDICINE; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULUM; HUMANS; NEUROANATOMY; PHYSICAL THERAPY (SPECIALTY); PROGRAM EVALUATION; SPINAL CORD;

EID: 77957590055     PISSN: 00907421     EISSN: 1945404X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development: Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Washington. D.C.: U.S. Department of Education; 2009.
2. Erickson ML: Examining the presence of computer-assisted instruction in physical therapy education. J Allied Health 2004; 33: 255-266.
3. McKeough DM, Bagatell N: Attitudes of health care students about computer-aided neuroanatomy instruction. J Allied Health 2009; 38:189-195.
4. Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM: Principles of Neural Science, 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2000.
5. Wang L: Developing and evaluating an interactive multimedia instructional tool: Learning outcomes and user experiences of optometry students. J Educ Multimedia Hypermedia 2008; 17:43-57.
6. Mayer RE: Multimedia Learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
7. Clark RC, Mayer RE: E-Learning and the Science of Instruction. San Francisco: Pfeiffer; 2003.
8. Turner MK, Simon SR, Fassmyer KC, et al: Web-based learning versus standardized patients for teaching clinical diagnosis: A randomized controlled, crossover trial. Teach Learn Med 2006; 18:208-214.
9. Harris JM, Elliott TE, Davis BE, et al: Educating generalists physicians about chronic pain: Live experts and online education can provide durable benefits. Pain Med 2007; 9:556-563.
10. Jang KS, Hwang SY, Park SJ, et al: Effects of a web-based teaching method on undergraduate nursing students' learning of electrocardiology. J Nurs Educ 2005; 44:35-39.
11. Schmeeckle JM: Online training: An evaluation of the effectiveness and efficacy of training law enforcement personnel over the Internet. J Soc Educ Tech 2003; 12:205-260.
12. Dede C: Online Professional Development for Teachers: Emerging Models and Methods. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group; 2006.
13. El-Deghaidy H, Nouby A: Effectiveness of a blended e-learning cooperative approach in an Egyptian education programme. Comp Educ 2008; 51:988-1006.
14. Harlen W, Daubler S: Can teachers learn through enquiry online?: Studying professional development in science delivered online ad oncampus. Int J Sci Educ 2004; 26:1247-1267.
15. Scoville SA, Buskirk TD: Traditional and virtual microscopy compared experimentally in a classroom setting. Clin Anat 2007; 20:565-570.
16. Hilbelink AJ: The effectiveness and user perception of 3-dimensional digital human anatomy in an online undergraduate anatomy laboratory [PhD dissertation]. Orlando, FL: University of South Florida; 2007.
17. Beechman DL, Schoonhoven L, Boucqué H, et al: Pressure ulcers: Elearning to improve classification by nurses and nursing students. J Clin Nurs 2008; 17:1697-1707.
18. Loar RS: The impact of a computer simulated case study on nurse practitioner students' declarative knowledge and clinical performance [PhD dissertation]. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2007.
19. Crippen KJ, Earl BL: The impact of web-based worked examples and self-explanation of performance, problem solving, and self-efficacy. Comp Educ 2007; 49:809-821.
20. Davis FD: A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results [dissertation]. Cambridge, MA: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1986.
21. Davis FD: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 1989; 13:319-339.
22. Venkatesh V, Davis FD: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci 2000; 46:186-204.
23. Bandura A: Social cognitive theory: An agentive perspective. Annu Rev Psych 2001; 52:1-26. (Pubitemid 33705565)
24. Bandura A: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
25. Bandura A: Self-efficacy mechanism in physiological activation and health-promoting behavior. In: Madden J (ed): Neurobiology of Learning, Emotion and Affect. New York: Raven; 1991: Pp229-270.
26. Jenks MS, Springer JM: A View of the research on the efficacy of CAI. Elect J Integration Tech Educ 2002; 1(2).
27. Lowe J: Computer-based education: Is it a panacea? J Res Tech Educ 2001; 34:163-171.