Can teachers learn through enquiry on-line? Studying professional development in science delivered on-line and on-campus

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 1247-1267

  Harlen, Wynne ^a   Doubler, Susan F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b LESLEY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10244222770     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0950069042000177253     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Collins, A., Brown, J. and Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: making thinking visible. American Educator, Winter 1991, 6-11 and 38-46.
2. Fraser, B. J. (1998) Science learning environments: assessment, effects and determinants. In B. J. Fraser and K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (Dordrecht: Kluwer).
3. Harlen, W. and Altobello, C. (2003). An investigation of "Try Science" studied on-line and face-to-face (Cambridge, MA: TERC).
4. Harlen, W., Holroyd, C. and Byrne, M. (1995). Confidence and understanding in teaching science and technology in primary schools (Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education).
5. Jaeger, M. (1995). Science teacher education at a distance. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 61-75.
6. Jones, T. (1992). Students' evaluation questionnaire for the fall semester of 1991. A summary and report (ERIC Report No ED 345 716).
7. Kuramato, A. (1984). Teleconferencing for nurses: Evaluating its effectiveness. In L. Parker and C. Olgren (Eds.), Teleconferencing and electronic communications III (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Extension, Center for Interactive programs).
8. Lombardi, T., Bauer, D., Peters, C. and O'Keefe, S. (1991). Satellite distance courses: a collaborative effort for meeting demands for special education teachers (ERIC Document ED 332 481).
9. McCleary, I. D. and Egan, M. W. (1989). Program design and evaluation: two-way interactive television. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(1), 50-60.
10. Moos, R. H. (1974). The social climate scales: an overview (Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press).
11. Naber, D. and LeBlanc, G. (1994). Providing a human biology laboratory for distant learners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2) 58-70.
12. Ritchie, H. and Newby, T. J. (1989). Classroom lecture/discussion vs live televised instruction. A comparison of effects on student performance, attitude and interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(3) 36-45.
13. Souder, W. E. (1993). The effectiveness of traditional vs satellite delivery in three management of technology master's degree programs. The American Journal of Distance Education, 7(1), 37-53.
14. Spooner, F., Luann, J., Algozzine, B. and Spooner, M. (1999). Student ratings of instruction in distance learning and on-campus classes. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(3), 132-140.
15. Stahmer, G., Smaldino, S., Hardman, R. and Muffaletto, R. (1992). A survey of students currently enrolled in interactive instructional television courses in community college in Iowa. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Washington, DC, February 1992.
16. Thomson, J. D. and Smith, C. L. (1996). Students' perceptions of the affective experiences encountered in distance learning courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 10(3), 37-48.
17. Tobin, K. G. (1998). Qualitative perceptions of learning environments on the World Wide Web. Learning Environments Research, 1, 139-162.
18. Weingand, D. E. (1984). Telecommunications and the traditional classroom: A study of the delivery of education. In L. Parker and C. Olgren (Eds.), Teleconferencing and electronic communications III (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Extension, Center for Interactive programs).