A decision model for energy resource selection in China

Energy Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 7130-7141

  Wang, Bing ^a,b   Kocaoglu, Dundar F ^a   Daim, Tugrul U ^a   Yang, Jiting ^a  

^a Portland State University   (United States)

^b BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS   (China)

Author keywords

China; Evaluation; Hierarchical decision model

Indexed keywords

CHINA; CURRENT ENERGY; DECISION MODELS; ENERGY SELECTION; EVALUATION; EXPERT JUDGMENT; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; RESOURCE SELECTION; SOCIAL IMPACT;

COAL DEPOSITS; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; MODELS; NATURAL GAS DEPOSITS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; COAL; ENERGY RESOURCE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; NATURAL GAS; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOCIAL IMPACT;

CHINA;

EID: 77957323458     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.031     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Adamantiades A., Kessides I. Nuclear power for sustainable development: current status and future prospects. Energy Policy 2009, 37(12):5149-5166.
2. Aminloei R.T., Ghaderi S.F. Generation planning in Iranian power plants with fuzzy hierarchical production planning. Energy Conversion and Management 2010, 51(6):1230-1241.
3. Andrews-Speed P. China's ongoing energy efficiency drive: origins, progress and prospects. Energy Policy 2009, 37(4):1331-1344.
4. Aragones-Beltran P., Chaparro-Gonzalez F., Pastor-Ferrando J.P., Rodriguez-Pozo F. An ANP-based approach for the selection of photovoltaic solar power plant investment projects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2010, 14(1):249-264.
5. Chatzimouratidis Athanasios I., Pilavachi Petros A. Sensitivity analysis of the evaluation of power plants impact on the living standard using the analytic hierarchy process. Energy Conversion and Management 2008, 49(12):3599-3611.
6. Carrera D.G., Mack A. Sustainability assessment of energy technologies via social indicators: results of a survey among European energy experts. Energy Policy 2010, 38(2):1030-1039.
7. Chatzimouratidis A.I., Pilavachi P.A. Objective and subjective evaluation of power plants and their non-radioactive emissions using the analytic hierarchy process. Energy Policy 2007, 35(8):4027-4038.
8. Chen R. RFM-based eco-efficiency analysis using Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy and AHP approach. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2009, 29(3):157-164.
9. Chen Z., Clements-Croome D., Hong J., Li H., Xu Q. A multicriteria lifespan energy efficiency approach to intelligent building assessment. Energy and Buildings 2006, 38(5):393-409.
10. Chen H., Kocaoglu D.F. A sensitivity analysis algorithm for hierarchical decision models. European Journal of Operational Research 2008, 185:266-288.
11. Choi S., Jun E., Hwang I., Starz A., Mazour T., Chang S., Burkart A.R. Fourteen lessons learned from the successful nuclear power program of the Republic of Korea. Energy Policy 2009, 37(12):5494-5508.
12. Daim T.U., Intarode N. A framework for technology assessment: case of a Thai building material manufacturer. Energy for Sustainable Development 2009, 13(4):280-286.
13. Dey P.K. An integrated assessment model for cross-country pipelines. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2002, 22(6):703-721.
14. Garcia E., Schweickardt G., Andreoni A. A new model to evaluate the dynamic adaptation of an electric distribution system. Energy Economics 2008, 30(4):1648-1658.
15. Gholamnezhad A.H., Saaty T.L. A desired energy mix for the United States in the year 2000: an analytic hierarchy approach. International Journal of Policy and Information Systems 1982, 6(1):53-54.
16. Gohin A., Chantret F. The long-run impact of energy prices on world agricultural markets: the role of macro-economic linkages. Energy Policy 2010, 38(1):333-339.
17. Han J., Mol A.P.J., Lu Y. Solar water heaters in China: a new day dawning. Energy Policy 2010, 38(1):383-391.
18. Hansson J., Berndes G., Johnsson F., Kjarstad J. Co-firing biomass with coal for electricity generation-an assessment of the potential in EU27. Energy Policy 2009, 37(4):1444-1455.
19. Jaber J.O., Jaber Q.M., Sawalha S.A., Mohsen M.S. Evaluation of conventional and renewable energy sources for space heating in the household sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2008, 12(1):278-289.
20. Jensen T.C., Moller F. Incorporating the value of changes in price volatility into cost-benefit analysis-an application to oil prices in the transport sector. Energy Policy 2010, 38(1):573-579.
21. Jun, E., Kim, W.J., Jeong, Y.H., Chang, S.H., 2010. Measuring the social value of nuclear energy using contingent valuation methodology, Energy Policy 38 (3), 1470-1476.
22. Kablan M. Prioritization of decentralized electricity options available for rural areas in Jordan. Energy Conversion and Management 1997, 38(14):1515-1521.
23. Kagazyo, T., Kaneko, K., Akai, M., Hijikata, K., Methodology and evaluation of priorities for energy and environmental research projects, Energy 22, 2-3, International Symposium on CO2 Fixation and Efficient Utilization of Energy, February-March 1997. pp. 121-129.
24. Kahraman, C., Kaya, I., Cebi, S. A comparative analysis for multiattribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, Energy 34 (10), 11th Conference on Process Integration, Modelling and Optimisation for Energy Saving and Pollution Reduction, October 2009. pp. 1603-1616.
25. Kocaoglu D.F. A participative approach to program evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 1983, 30(3):37-44.
26. Kruyt B., van Vuuren D.P., de Vries H.J.M., Groenenberg H. Indicators for energy security, Energy Policy. China Energy Efficiency 2009, 37(6):2166-2181.
27. Labandeira X., Labeaga J.M., Rodriguez M. An integrated economic and distributional analysis of energy policies. Energy Policy 2009, 37(12):5776-5786.
28. Lee S.K., Mogi G., Kim J.W. The competitiveness of Korea as a developer of hydrogen energy technology: the AHP approach. Energy Policy 2008, 36(4):1284-1291.
29. Lee S.K., Mogi G., Kim J.W., Gim B.J. A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach for assessing national competitiveness in the hydrogen technology sector. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33(23):6840-6848.
30. Lee S.K., Yoon Y.J., Kim J.W. A study on making a long-term improvement in the national energy efficiency and GHG control plans by the AHP approach. Energy Policy 2007, 35(5):2862-2868.
31. Limmeechokchai B., Chawana S. Sustainable energy development strategies in the rural Thailand: the case of the improved cooking stove and the small biogas digester. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2007, 11(5):818-837.
32. Lin S.X., Tamvakis M. OPEC announcements and their effects on crude oil prices. Energy Policy 2010, 38(2):1010-1016.
33. Liu J., Ma X. The analysis on energy and environmental impacts of microalgae-based fuel methanol in China. Energy Policy 2009, 37(4):1479-1488.
34. Lopez I., Rodriguez J., Buron J.M., Garcia A. A methodology for evaluating environmental impacts of railway freight transportation policies. Energy Policy 2009, 37(12):5393-5398.
35. Nagesha N., Balachandra P. Barriers to energy efficiency in small industry clusters: Multi-criteria-based prioritization using the analytic hierarchy process. Energy 2006, 31(12):1969-1983.
36. National Bureau of Statistics of China On-post staff and workers and wages by sector (2006). Retrieved 02/09/2009, http://www.stats.gov.cn.
37. Nel W.P., Cooper C.J. Implications of fossil fuel constraints on economic growth and global warming. Energy Policy 2009, 37(1):166-180.
38. Nigim K., Munier N., Green J. Pre-feasibility MCDM tools to aid communities in prioritizing local viable renewable energy sources. Renewable Energy 2004, 29(11):1775-1791.
39. Oliver-Sola J., Gabarrell X., Rieradevall J. Environmental impacts of the infrastructure for district heating in urban neighbourhoods. Energy Policy 2009, 37(11):4711-4719.
40. Onut S., Tuzkaya U.R., Saadet N. Multiple criteria evaluation of current energy resources for Turkish manufacturing industry. Energy Conversion and Management 2008, 49(6):1480-1492.
41. Panoutsou C., Eleftheriadis J., Nikolaou Aa Biomass supply in EU27 from 2010 to 2030. Energy Policy 2009, 37(12):5675-5686.
42. Praetorius B., Schumacher K. Greenhouse gas mitigation in a carbon constrained world: The role of carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy 2009, 37(12):5081-5093.
43. Quintero J.A., Montoya M.I., Sanchez O.J., Giraldo O.H., Cardona C.A. Fuel ethanol production from sugarcane and corn: comparative analysis for a Colombian case. Energy 2008, 33(3):385-399.
44. Ramanathan R., Ganesh L.S. Energy alternatives for lighting in households: an evaluation using an integrated goal programming-AHP model. Energy 1995, 20(1):63-72.
45. Saaty T. The Analytic Hierarchy Process 1980, McGraw-Hill, New York.
46. Shen, Y., 2004. The research on the strategy model of Chinese energy development. Doctoral dissertation of Liaoning Technical University. pp. 3-30.
47. Shiau C.N., Samaras C., Hauffe R., Michalek J.J. Impact of battery weight and charging patterns on the economic and environmental benefits of plug-in hybrid vehicles. Energy Policy 2009, 37(7):2653-2663.
48. Siriwardhana M., Opathella G.K.C., Jha M.K. Bio-diesel: initiatives, potential and prospects in Thailand: a review. Energy Policy 2009, 37(2):554-559.
49. Stephens, J.C., Jiusto S., 2010. Assessing innovation in emerging energy technologies: socio-technical dynamics of carbon capture and storage (CCS) and enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) in the USA, Energy Policy 38 (4), 2020-2031.
50. Thorhallsdottir T.E. Strategic planning at the national level: Evaluating and ranking energy projects by environmental impact. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2007, 27(6):545-568.
51. Thornley P., Upham P., Huang Y., Rezvani S., Brammer J., Rogers J. Integrated assessment of bioelectricity technology options. Energy Policy 2009, 37(3):890-903.
52. Tomei J., Upham P. Argentinean soy-based biodiesel: An introduction to production and impacts. Energy Policy, Carbon in Motion: Fuel Economy, Vehicle Use, and Other Factors affecting CO2 Emissions From Transport 2009, 37(10):3890-3898.
53. Umbach F., 2010. Global energy security and the implications for the EU, Energy Policy 38 (3), 1229-1240.
54. Vashishtha S., Ramachandran M. Multicriteria evaluation of demand side management (DSM) implementation strategies in the Indian power sector. Energy 2006, 31(12):2210-2225.
55. Verbruggen A., Fischedick M., Moomaw W., Weir T., Nadai A., Nilsson L., Nyboer J., Sathaye J. Renewable energy costs, potentials, barriers: conceptual issues. Energy Policy 2010, 38(2):850-861.
56. von Hippel, D., Savage, T., Hayes, P. Overview of the Northeast Asia energy situation, Energy Policy, in press, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.004.
57. Wang F., Yin, H., Li, S., 2010. China's renewable energy policy: commitments and challenges. Energy Policy 38 (4), 1872-1878.
58. Wang J.J., Zhang C., Jing Y., Zheng G. Using the fuzzy multi-criteria model to select the optimal cool storage system for air conditioning. Energy and Buildings 2008, 40(11):2059-2066.
59. Wang T. "The Foreground & Social Influence of China's Energy Industry (1st Half)", Retrieved 02/09/2009, http://www.xj.cei.gov.cn.
60. Whistance, J., Thompson, W., 2010. How does increased corn-ethanol production affect US natural gas prices? Energy Policy, in press, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.039.
61. Williams, J. The deployment of decentralised energy systems as part of the housing growth programme in the UK. Energy Policy, in press, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.039.
62. Xiaohua W., Zhenmin F. Sustainable development of rural energy and its appraising system in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2002, 6(4):395-404.
63. Xinhua News Agency, 2007. Ministry of Land and Resources of China: China's remaining petroleum economic exploitable reserves is about 2.043 trillion metric tons. Retrieved 02/08/2009, http://news.xinhuanet.com/fortune/2007-03/29/content_5912116.htm.
64. Yan X., Crookes R.J. Reduction potentials of energy demand and GHG emissions in China's road transport sector. Energy Policy 2009, 37(2):658-668.
65. Yang M. Climate change and energy policies, coal and coalmine methane in China. Energy Policy 2009, 37(8):2858-2869.
66. Yu J., Ji F., Zhang L., Chen Y. An over painted oriental arts: evaluation of the development of the Chinese renewable energy market using the wind power market as a model. Energy Policy 2009, 37(12):5221-5225.
67. Yuan C., Liu S., Wu J. The relationship among energy prices and energy consumption in China. Energy Policy 2010, 38(1):197-207.
68. Yuan C., Liu S., Fang Z., Wu J. Research on the energy-saving effect of energy policies in China: 1982-2006. Energy Policy 2009, 37(7):2475-2480.
69. Zhao. C., Ma, C., Hong, D., 2010. Why did China's energy intensity increase during 1998-2006: decomposition and policy analysis. Energy Policy 38 (3), 1379-1388.
70. Zhen, L., Cao, S., Wei, Y., Dilly, O., Liu, X., Li, F., HKoenig, H., Tscherning, K., Helming, K., 2009. Comparison of sustainability issues in two sensitive areas of China. Environmental Science & Policy 12 (8), 1153-1167.
71. Zhidong, L., 2010. Quantitative analysis of sustainable energy strategies in China. Energy Policy 38 (5), 2149-2160.