Multicriteria evaluation of demand side management (DSM) implementation strategies in the Indian power sector

Energy

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 2210-2225

  Vashishtha, Sanjay ^a   Ramachandran, M ^b  

^a BIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE   (India)

^b BIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE   (United Arab Emirates)

Author keywords

DSM strategies; Multicriteria evaluation; Utilities

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; COSTS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

DEMAND SIDE MANAGEMENT (DSM) STRATEGIES; MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION; UTILITIES;

ENERGY UTILIZATION;

COST EFFECTIVENESS; COSTS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; ENERGY UTILIZATION; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS;

ASIA; EURASIA; INDIA; SOUTH ASIA;

EID: 33745821588     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2005.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. International Energy Agency. Demand side management programme, annual report, 1999. Stockholm: International Energy Agency; 2000.
2. Joskow P., and Marron D. What does a Negawatt really cost? Evidence from utility conservation programs. Energy J 13 4 (1993) 41-74
3. Reddy S., and Parikh J.K. Economic and environmental impacts of demand-side management programmes. Energy Policy 25 3 (1997) 49-56
4. Vashishtha S., and Ramachandran M. DSM plan for residential sector in Rajasthan. Bull Energy Effic 3 4 (2003) 18-21
5. Biran W. ECO project: advancing the cause of energy conservation. Bull Energy Effic 3 4 (2003) 12-14
6. Energy Conservation Act. Ministry of Power, New Delhi, India, 2001. See also http://www.mop.nic.in.
7. Painuly J.P., and Reddy B.S. Electricity conservation programmes: barriers to their implementation. Energy Sources 18 3 (1997) 257-267
8. Saaty T.L. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48 1 (1990) 2-8
9. Clarke R. An analytic hierarchy process approach to integrated resource planning. In: Proceedings of the NGO Forum, First UN Global conference on sustainable development for small Island States (SIDS), held in Barbados, April 20-May 6, 1994.
10. Hobbs B.F., and Mieier P. Multicriteria methods for resource planning: an experimental comparison. IEEE Trans Power Syst 9 4 (1994) 1811-1816
11. Ramnathan R., and Ganesh L.S. Energy alternatives for lighting in households: an evaluation using integrated goal programming-AHP model. Energy 20 1 (1995) 63-72
12. Mills D., Lowe I., and Vlacic L. A hierarchal decision support system for integrated resource planning. J Decis Syst 7 (1998) 21-38
13. Hobbs B.F., and Horn G.T. Building public confidence in energy planning: a multimethod MCDM approach to demand-side planning at BC gas. Energy Policy 25 3 (1997) 357-375
14. Ramanathan R. Evaluating greenhouse gas control strategies for India using multicriteria approaches. In: Toman M, Chakravorty U, Gupta S, editors. India and global climate change: perspectives on economic and policy from a developing country. Resources for the future, Washington, DC, USA, 2003. p. 195-216 [chapter 9].
15. Crossley D, Hamrin J, Vine E, Eyre N. Public policy implications of mechanisms for promoting energy efficiency and load management in changing electricity businesses, IEA DSM Programme. Task VI research report no. 2, 1999.
16. Crossley D, Muchelle M, Greg W. Developing mechanisms for promoting DSM and energy efficiency, IEA DSM programme. Task VI research report no. 3, 2000.
17. Wuppertal Institute. Completing the market for least-cost energy services, strengthening energy efficiency in the changing European electricity and gas markets (2000), Wuppertal Institute, Wuppertal, Germany
18. Sioshansi F.P. DSM in transition: from mandates to markets. Energy Policy 24 4 (1996) 283-284
19. Levine M.D., Koomey J.G., Price L., Geller H., and Nadel S. Electricty end-use efficiency: experience with technologies, markets, and policies throughout the world. Energy 10 1 (1995) 37-61
20. Nadel S., and Geller H. Utility DSM: what have we learned? Where are we going?. Energy Policy 24 4 (1996) 289-302
21. Parikh J.K., Reddy B.S., Banerjee R., and Koundinya S. DSM survey in India: awareness, barriers and implementability. Energy 21 10 (1996) 955-966
22. Banerjee R. Load management in the Indian power sector using US experience. Energy 23 11 (1998) 961-972
23. Minichiello V., Aroni R., Timewell E., and Alexander L. In-depth interviewing. 2nd ed (1995), Addison Wesley Longman Australia Pty Limited, South Melbourne, Australia
24. Painuly P.J., Park H., Lee M.K., and Noh J. Promoting energy efficiency financing and ESCOs in developing countries: mechanisms and barriers. J Clean Prod 11 6 (2002) 559-565
25. Thomas S, Jerôme A, Pierluigi A, Wolfgang I, Carlos L, Nilsson L, et al. Completing the market for least-cost energy services. Strengthening energy efficiency in the changing European electricity and gas markets. A report. Germany: Wuppertal Institute for Climate Environment Energy; 2000.
26. Khanna M., and Zilberman D. Barriers to energy-efficiency in electricity generation in India. Energy 20 1 (1999) 25-40
27. Vine E.L., Chiharu M., and Hidetoshi N. International ESCO business opportunities and challenges: a Japanese case study. Energy 23 6 (1998) 439-447
28. Vine E.L., Chiharu M., and Hidetoshi N. International ESCO business opportunities and challenges: a Japanese case study. Energy 23 6 (1998) 439-447
29. Lee M.K., Park H., Noh J., and Panualy J.P. Promoting energy efficiency financing and ESCOs in developing countries: experiences from Korean ESCO business. J Clean Prod 11 1 (2003) 651-657
30. Metty J, Beckwith, J. A multicriteria evaluation of policy options for reducing mercury emissions from US coal fired plants. Research report no. 580. Michigan: Michigan Agriculture Experimentation Station; 2002.
31. Saaty T.L. The analytic hierarchy process (1980), McGraw-Hill International, New York