A robust multiple classifier system for pixel classification of remote sensing images

Fundamenta Informaticae

Volumn 101, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 286-304

  Maulik, Ujjwal ^a   Chakraborty, Debasis ^b  

^a JADAVPUR UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b MAULANA ABUL KALAM AZAD UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Incremental learning; Kernel function; Multiple classifier system; Pixel classification; Remote sensing imagery; Support vector machines

Indexed keywords

INCREMENTAL LEARNING; KERNEL FUNCTION; MULTIPLE CLASSIFIER SYSTEMS; PIXEL CLASSIFICATION; REMOTE SENSING IMAGERY; SUPPORT VECTOR;

CLASSIFIERS; GEARS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; PIXELS; REMOTE SENSING; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; VECTORS;

SATELLITE IMAGERY;

EID: 77957306548     PISSN: 01692968     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2010-289     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aizerman, M. A., Braveman, E. M., Rozoner, I.I.: Theoretical foundation of the potential function method in pattern recognition learning, Automation and Remote Control, 25, 1964, 821-827.
2. Bandyopadhyay, S., Maulik, U.: Non-parametric genetic clustering: comparison of validity indices, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part-C, 31(1), 2001, 120-125.
3. Bandyopadhyay, S., Pal, S. K.: Pixel classification using variable string genetic algorithms with chromosome differentiation, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39(2), 2001, 303-308.
4. Bandyopadhyay, S., Maulik, U., Mukhopadhyay, A.: Multiobjective genetic clustering for pixel classification in remote sensing imagery, IEEE transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45(5), 2007, 1506-1511.
5. Bezdek, J. C., Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms, New York: Plenum, 1981.
6. Chen, K. S., Tzeng, Y. C., Chen, C. F., Kao, W. L.: Land cover classification of multispectral imegery using a dynamic learning neural network, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 25, 1995, 403-408.
7. Cohen, J.: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 1960, 37-46.
8. Collins,M. J., Dymond, C., Johnson, E. A.: Mapping subalpine forest types using networks of nearest neighbor classifiers, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25, 2004, 1701-1721.
9. Debeir, O., van den Steen, I., Latinne, P., van Ham, P., Wolff, E. :Textural and contextural land cover classification using single and multiple classifier systems, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 68, 2002, 597-605.
10. Defries, R. S., Chan, J. C.: Multiple criteria for evaluating machine learning algorithms for land cover classification from satellite data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 74, 2000, 503-515.
11. Foody, G.M.,Mathur, A.: A relative evaluation of multiclass image classification by support vector machine, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42, 2004, 1335-1343.
12. Foody, G. M., Mathur, A.: Toward intelligent training of supervised image classification: directing training data acquisition for SVM classification, Remote Sensing of Environment, 93, 2004, 107-117.
13. Franklin, J., Phinn, S. R.,Woodcock, C. E., Rogan, J.: Rationale and conceptual framework for classification approaches to assess forest resources and properties, in: Remote Sensing of Forest Environments: Concepts and Case Studies (M. A. Wulder and S. E. Franklin, Eds), Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003, 279-300.
14. Hardin, P. J.: Parametric and nearest neighbor methods for hybrid classification: a comparison of pixel assignment accuracy, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60, 1994, 1439-1448.
15. Huang, C., Davis, L. S., Townshed, J. R. G.: An assessment of support vectorm machines for land cover classifiaction, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23, 2002, 725-749.
16. Huang, Z., Lees, B. G.: Combining nonparametric models for multisource predictive forest mapping, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 70, 2004, 415-425.
17. Jantke, P. : Types of incremental learning. AAAI Symposium on Training Issues in Incremental learning, March 23-25, 1993, Stanford, CA,
18. Kavzoglu, T., Mather, P. M.: The use of backpropagating artificial neural networks in land cover classification, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24, 2004, 4907-4938.
19. Kramer, J. H.: Observation of the earth and its environment, Survey of Missions and Sensors (4th Edition), Berlin, Springer, 2002.
20. Lawrence, R., Bunn, A., Powell, S., Zmabon,M.: Classification of remotely sensed imagery using stochastic gradient boosting as a refinement of classification tree analysis, Remote Sensing of Environment, 90, 2004, 331-336.
21. Li, T. S., Chen, C. Y., Su, C. T.: Comparison of neural and statistical algorithms for supervised classification of multidimensional data, International Journal of Industrial Engineering - Theory, Application and Practice, 10, 2003, 73-81.
22. Liu, W., Gopal, S., Woodcock, C. E. Uncertainty and confidence in land cover classification using hybrid classifier approach, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 70, 2004, 963-972.
23. Lo, C. P., Choi, J.: A hybrid approach to urban land use/cover mapping using landsat 7 enhanced thematic mapper plus (ETM + ) images, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25, 2004, 2687-2700.
24. Lu, D., Weng, Q.: Spectral mixture analysis of the urban landscapes in indianapolis with landsat ETM + imagery, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 70, 2004, 1053-1062.
25. Lu, D., Mausel, P., Batistella, M., Morgan, E.: Comparison of land cover classification methods in the Brazillian Amazon basin, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 70, 2004, 723-731.
26. Maulik,U., Bandyopadhyay, S.: Performance evaluation of some clustering algorithms and validity indices, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(12), 2002, 1650-1654.
27. Mahesh, P., Mather, P. M.: An Assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification, Remote Sensing of Environment, 86, 2003, 554-565.
28. Osuna, E., Freund, R., Girosi, F.: Training Support vector Machine: an application to face detection, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1997, 130-136.
29. Peddle, D. R., Foody, G. M., Zhang, A., Franklin, S., LeDrew, E. F.:Multisource image classification II: an empirical comparison of evidential reasoning and neural network approaches, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 20, 1994, 396-407.
30. Pontil, M., Verri, A.: Support vector machines for 3-D object recognition, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20, 1998, 637-646.
31. Rogan, J., Roberts, D. A.: A comparison of methods for monitoring multitemporal vegetation change using thematic mapper imagery, Remote Sensing of Environment, 80, 2002, 143-156.
32. Scholkopf, B., Kah-Kay, C., Burges, C. J., Girosi, F., Niyogi, P., Poggio, T., Vapnik, V.: Comparing support vector machines with gaussian kernels to radial basis fuction classifiers, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processings, 45, 1997, 2758-2765.
33. Steele, B. M.: Combining multiple classifiers: an application using special and remotely sensed information for land cover type mapping, Remote Sensing of Environment, 74, 2000, 545-556.
34. Tou, J. T., Gonzalez, R. C.: Pattern Recognition Principles, Addison-Wesley, 1974.
35. Tso, B., Mather, P. M. Classification Methods for Remotely Sensed Data, New York: Taylor and Francis Inc., 2001.
36. Vapnik, V.: Statistical Learning Theory, New York,Wiley, 1998.
37. Wan, V., Campbell,W. M.: Support vector machines for speaker verification and identification, in: Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processings, Sydney, Australia, 2000, 775-784.
38. Xie, X. L., Beni, G.: A validity measure for fuzzy clustering, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13, 1991, 841-847.