Scientific Nonknowledge and Its Political Dynamics: The Cases of Agri-Biotechnology and Mobile Phoning

Science Technology and Human Values

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 783-811

  Böschen, Stefan ^a   Kastenhofer, Karen ^b   Rust, Ina ^c   Soentgen, Jens ^a   Wehling, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUGSBURG   (Germany)

^b ERICH SCHMID INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Austria)

^c LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

agri biotechnology; epistemic culture; mobile phoning; nonknowledge; risk

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957280570     PISSN: 01622439     EISSN: 15528251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0162243909357911     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Bonneuil, C. 2006. Cultures épistémiques et engagement public des chercheurs dans la controverse OGM. Natures Sciences Sociétés 14 (3):257-68.
2. Bonneuil, C., P. -B. Joly, and C. Marris. 2008. Disentrenching experiment: The construction of GM-crop field trials as a social problem. Science Technology Human Values 33 (2):201-29.
3. Bonss, W., R. Hohlfeld, and R. Kollek. 1993a. Soziale und kognitive Kontexte des Risikobegriffs in der Gentechnologie. In Wissenschaft als Kontext-Kontexte der Wissenschaft, ed. W. Bonss, R. Hohlfeld and R. Kollek, 53-67. Hamburg: Junius.
4. Bonss, W., R. Hohlfeld, and R. Kollek. 1993b. Kontextualität-ein neues Paradigma der Wissenschaftsanalyse? In Wissenschaft als Kontext-Kontexte der Wissenschaft, ed. W. Bonss, R. Hohlfeld and R. Kollek, 171-91. Hamburg: Junius.
5. Böschen, S., K. Kastenhofer, L. Marschall, I. Rust, J. Söntgen, and P. Wehling. 2006. Scientific cultures of non-knowledge in the controversy over genetically modified organisms (GMO). The Cases of Molecular Biology and Ecology. GAIA 15 (4):294-301.
6. Böschen, S., K. Kastenhofer, I. Rust, J. Soentgen, and P. Wehling. 2008. Entscheidungen unter Bedingungen pluraler Nichtwissenskulturen. In Wissensproduktion und Wissenstransfer. Wissen im Spannungsfeld von Wissenschaft, Politik und Öffentlichkeit, ed. Mayntz R., Neidhardt F., Weingart P. and Wengenroth U., 197-220. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
7. Boschert, K., and B. Gill. 2005. Germany's agri-biotechnology policy: Precaution for choice and alternatives. Science and Public Policy 32 (4):285-92.
8. Collingridge, D. 1980. The social control of technology. New York: St. Martin's Press.
9. Drake, F. 2006. Mobile phone masts: Protesting the scientific evidence. Public Understanding of Science 15 (4):387-410.
10. EEA (European Environment Agency). 2001. In Late lessons from early warnings: The precautionary principle 1896-2000. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
11. Faber, M., and J. Proops. 1993. Evolution, time, production and the environment. 2nd, rev. and enl. edition. Berlin: Springer.
12. Farman, J. 2001. Halocarbons, the ozone layer and the precautionary principle. In Late lessons from early warnings: The precautionary principle 1896-2000, ed. EEA (Environmental issue report, No 22), 76-83. Copenhagen: EEA.
13. Galison, P., and D. Stump, eds. 1996. The disunity of science. Boundaries, contexts, and power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
14. Greenpeace. 2005. Risk underestimated. Interviews with nine scientists on the subject of genetically modified plants. Hamburg: Greenpeace e. V.
15. Gross, M. 2007. The unknown in process. Dynamic connections of ignorance, nonknowledge and related concepts. Current Sociology 55 (5):742-59.
16. Grove-White, R. 2001. New wine, old bottles. Personal reflections on the new biotechnology commissions. Political Quarterly 72 (4):466-72.
17. Hardell, L., M. Carlberg, and K.H. Mild. 2006. Case-control study of the association between the use of cellular and cordless telephones and malignant brain tumors diagnosed during 2000-2003. Environmental Research 100 (2):232-41.
18. Hardell, L., M. Carlberg, F. Söderqvist, K.H. Mild, and L.L. Morgan. 2007. Long-term use of cellular phones and brain tumours: Increased risk associated with use for >10 years. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 64 (9): 626-32.
19. Hardell, L., H. Mild, and M. Kundi. 2007. Evidence for brain tumors and acoustic neuromas. In BioInitiative report: A rationale for a biologically based public exposure standard for electromagnetic fields. BioInitiative 2007. http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/docs/report.pdf.
20. Harremoës, P., D. Gee, M. MacGarvin, A. Stirling, J. Keys, B. Wynne and S. Guedes Vaz. 2001. Twelve Late Lessons. Late lessons from early warnings: The precautionary principle 1896-2000. ed. EEA, 168-191. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
21. Kapteina, M. 2000. Die Freisetzung von gentechnisch veränderten Organismen. Genehmigungsvoraussetzungen nach dem Gentechnikgesetz. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
22. Kastenhofer, K. 2007. Converging epistemic cultures? A discussion drawing on empirical findings. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 20 (4):359-73.
23. Kerwin, A. 1993. None too solid: Medical ignorance. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 15 (2):166-85.
24. Knorr-Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Levidow, L., S. Carr, and D. Wield. 2005. European Union regulation of agri-biotechnology: Precautionary links between science, expertise and policy. Science and Public Policy 32 (4):261-76.
26. Lezaun, J., and L. Soneryd. 2007. Consulting citizens: Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics. Public Understanding of Science 16 (3):279-97.
27. Michael, M. 1996. Ignoring science: Discourses of ignorance in the public understanding of science. In Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology, ed. A. Irwin and B. Wynne, 107-25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Moch, K. 2004. Diskussionspapier: Das überholte Paradigma der Gentechnik. Freiburg: Öko-Institut.
29. Moch, K. 2006. Proceedings of the Conference 'Epigenetics, Transgenic Plants & Risk Assessment.' Freiburg: Öko-Institut.
30. Proctor, R.N. 2008. Agnotology: A missing term to describe the cultural production of ignorance (and its study). In Agnotology. The making and unmaking of ignorance, ed. R. N. Proctor and L. Schiebinger, 1-33. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
31. Ravetz, J.R. 1986. Usable knowledge, usable ignorance. In Sustainable development of the biosphere, ed. W. C. Clark and R. E. Munn, 415-32. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Ravetz, J.R. 1990. The merger of knowledge with power. Essays in critical science. London: Mansell.
33. Rheinberger, H.J. 2001. Experimentalsysteme und epistemische Dinge. Eine Geschichte der Proteinsynthese im Reagenzglas. Göttingen: Wallstein.
34. Scheringer, M. 2000. Exposure and effect-based risk assessment and management. In Risk assessment and risk management of toxic chemicals in the European Community, ed. G. Winter, 89-97. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
35. Scheringer, M. 2002. Persistence and spatial range of environmental chemicals. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
36. Smithson, M. 1985. Toward a social theory of ignorance. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 15 (2):151-72.
37. Smithson, M. 1989. Ignorance and uncertainty. Emerging paradigms. New York/Berlin: Springer.
38. Smithson, M. 2008. Social theories of ignorance. In Agnotology. The making and unmaking of ignorance, ed. R. N. Proctor and L. Schiebinger, 209-29. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
39. Soil Association. 2003. Guidance on Post-Market-Monitoring of GM Crops-Soil Association response to ACRE consultation. Accessed May 2007. www.soilassociation.org.
40. Soneryd, L. 2007. Deliberations on the unknown, the unsensed, and the unsayable? Public protests and the development of third-generation mobile phones in Sweden. Science Technology Human Values 32 (3):287-314.
41. Stilgoe, J. 2005. Controlling mobile phone health risks in the UK: A fragile discourse of compliance. Science and Public Policy 32 (1):55-64.
42. Stilgoe, J. 2007. The (co-)production of public uncertainty: UK scientific advice on mobile phone health risks. Public Understanding of Science 16 (1):45-61.
43. Stirling, A. 2006. Precaution, foresight and sustainability: Reflection and reflexivity in the governance of science and technology. In Reflexive government for sustainable development, ed. J. -P. Voss, D. Bauknecht and R. Kemp, 225-72. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.
44. Stocking, S.H., and L. Holstein. 1993. Constructing and reconstructing scientific ignorance: Ignorance claims in science and journalism. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 15 (2):186-210.
45. Strand, R. 2000. Naivety in the molecular life sciences. Futures 32 (5):451-70.
46. Walton, D. 1996. Arguments from ignorance. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
47. WBGU (Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen). 1999. 'Welt im Wandel: Strategien zur Bewältigung globaler Umweltrisiken'. Jahresgutachten 1998. Berlin: Springer.
48. Wehling, P. 2006. Im Schatten des Wissens? Perspektiven der Soziologie des Nichtwissens. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.
49. Weinstein, D., and M. Weinstein. 1978. The sociology of nonknowledge: A paradigm. In Research in the sociology of knowledge, sciences and art, vol. 1, ed. R. A. Jones, 151-66. New York: JAI Press.
50. Wynne, B. 1992. Uncertainty and environmental learning. Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. In Global Environmental Change, 2(2), 111-27.
51. Wynne, B. 2001. Expert discourses of risk and ethics on genetically manipulated organisms: The weaving of public alienation. Politeia, 17(62):51-76.
52. Wynne, B., and U. Felt. 2007. Taking European Knowledge society seriously. Report of the expert group on science and governance. Brussels: European Commission.
53. Züghart, W., A. Benzler, F. Berhorn, F. Graef, and U. Sukopp. 2005. Monitoring der Wirkungen gentechnisch veränderter Organismen auf Natur und Landschaft nach Marktzulassung. Natur und Landschaft 80 (7):307-12.
54. Zwanenburg, P. van, and E. Millstone. 2005. BSE: Risk, science and governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.