Periprosthetic Bone Remodeling Using a Triple-Taper Polished Cemented Stem in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1083-1090

  Buckland, Aaron J ^a   Dowsey, Michelle M ^a,b   Stoney, James D ^a,b   Hardidge, Andrew J ^a   Ng, Kong Wah ^a,b   Choong, Peter F M ^a,b  

^a ST VINCENT S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Bone remodeling; DEXA; Prospective; Triple taper stem

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; PATIENT MOBILITY; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SEX DIFFERENCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TRIPLE TAPER POLISHED CEMENTED STEM;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; BONE RESORPTION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 77957259021     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Malchau H., Herberts P., Ahnfelt L. Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden: follow-up of 92,675 operations performed 1987-1990. Acta Orthop Scand 1993, 64:497.
2. Australian Orthopaedic Association. National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report. Hip and knee replacement from September 1999 to December 2007. Adelaide:AOA. Available from: [Accessed 18/12/2008]. http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr/publications.jsp.
3. Kobayashi S., Salto N., Horicuchi H., et al. Poor bone quality or hip structure as risk factors affecting survival of total-hip arthroplasty. Lancet 2000, 355:1499.
4. Carlsson A.S., Gentz C.F. Mechanical loosening of the femoral head prosthesis in the Charnley total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1980, 147:262.
5. Engh C.A., Glassman A.H., Suthers K.E. The case for porous-coated hip implants. The femoral side. Clin Orthop 1990, 261:63.
6. Kerner J., Huiskes R., van Lenthe G.H., et al. Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodelling. J Biomech 1999, 32:695.
7. Kroger H., Miettinen H., Arnala I., et al. Evaluation of periprosthetic bone using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: precision of the method and effect of operation on bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res 1996, 11:1526.
8. Damborg F., Nissen N., Jorgensen H.R.I., et al. Changes in bone mineral density (BMD) around the cemented Exeter stem: a prospective study in 18 women with 5 years follow-up. Acta Orthop 1998, 79:494.
9. Cohen B., Rushton N. Bone remodelling in the proximal femur after Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1995, 77B:815.
10. Venesmaa P., Kroger H.P.J., Jurvelin J.S., et al. Periprosthetic bone loss after cemented total hip arthroplasty-a prospective 5-year dual energy radiographic absorptiometry study of 15 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2003, 74:31.
11. Burchard R., Leppek R., Scmitt J., et al. Volumetric measurement of periprosthetic bone remodelling: prospective 5 years follow-up after cemented total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2007, 127:361.
12. Turner A.W.L., Giles R.M., Sekel R., et al. Computational bone remodelling simulations and comparison with DEXA results. J Orthop Res 2005, 23:705.
13. Wroblewski B., Siney P., Fleming P. Triple taper polished cemented stem in total hip arthroplasty; rationale for design, surgical technique and 7 years of clinical experience. J Arthroplasty 2001, 16:37.
14. Gruen T., McNiece G., Amstutz H. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 1979, 141:17.
15. Harris W.H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty: an end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1969, 51:737.
16. Barrack R.L., Mulroy R.D., Harris W.H. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1992, 74-B:385.
17. Ebramzadeh E., Normand P., Sangiorgio S., et al. Long-term radiological changes in cemented total hip arthroplasty with six designs of femoral components. Biomaterials 2003, 24:3351.
18. McCarthy C.K., Steinberg G.G., Agren M., et al. Quantifying bone loss from the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1991, 73-B:774.
19. Wroblevski B.M., Fleming P.A., Hall R.M., et al. Stem fixation in the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients using an intramedullary bone block. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1998, 80:237.
20. Rahmy A.I.A., Gosens T., Blake G.M., et al. Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and pre-operative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss. Osteoporosis Int 2004, 15:281.
21. Aldinger P.R., Sabo D., Pritsch M., et al. Pattern of periprosthetic bone remodelling around stable uncemented tapered hip stems: a prospective 84-month follow-up study and a median 156-month cross-sectional study with DXA. Calcif Tissue Int 2003, 73:115.
22. Niinimaki T., Jalovaara P. Bone loss from the proximal femur after arthroplasty with an isoelastic femoral stem. Acta Orthop Scand 1995, 66:347.
23. Venesmaa P., Kroger H.P.J., Miettinen H.J.A., et al. Monitoring of periprosthetic BMD after total hip arthroplasty with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry-a 3-year follow-up study. J Bone Miner Res 2001, 16:1056.
24. Nixon M., Taylor G., Sheldon P., et al. Does bone quality predict loosening of cemented total hip replacements?. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007, 89:1303.
25. Munger P., Roder C., Ackermann-Liebrich U., et al. Patient-related risk factors leading to aseptic stem loosening in total hip arthroplasty-a case control study of 5,035 patients. Acta Orthop 2006, 77:567.
26. Roder C., Parvizi J., Eggli S., et al. Demographic factors affecting long-term outcome of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2003, 417:62.
27. Perka C., Heller M., Wilke K., et al. Surgical approach influences periprosthetic femoral bone density. Clin Orthop 2005, 432:153.
28. Jolles B.M., Bogoch E.R. Posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty in adults with osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006, CD003828. 10.1002/14651858.
29. Gore D.R., Murray M.P., Sepic S.B., et al. Anterolateral compared to posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1982, 165:180.
30. Arthursson A.J., Furnes O., Espehaug B., et al. Prosthesis survival after total hip arthroplasty-does surgical approach matter?. Acta Orthop 2007, 78:719.