Phylogeny and circumscription of Sapindaceae revisited: Molecular sequence data, morphology and biogeography support recognition of a new family, Xanthoceraceae

Plant Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 143, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 148-159

  Buerki, Sven ^a   Lowry II, Porter P ^b,c   Alvarez, Nadir ^d   Razafimandimbison, Sylvain G ^e   Küpfer, Philippe ^f   Callmander, Martin W ^b,g  

^a CSIC   (Spain)

^b MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

^c MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^e STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

^g Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la ville de Genève ^*  (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Aceraceae; Harpullieae; Hippocastanaceae; Molecular phylogeny; New family; Sapindaceae; Xanthoceraceae; Xanthoceras

Indexed keywords

SAPINDACEAE; XANTHOCERAS;

EID: 77957135147     PISSN: 20323913     EISSN: 20323921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5091/plecevo.2010.437     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG II) (2003) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 399-436.
2. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG III) (2009) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 105-121.
3. Backlund A., Bremer, K. (1998) To be or not to be - principles of classification of monotypic families. Taxon 47: 391-400.
4. Bello M.A., Bruneau A., Forest F., Hawkins J.A. (2009) Elusive relationships within order Fabales: phylogenetic analyses using matK and rbcL sequence data. Systematic Botany 34: 102-114.
5. Buerki S., Forest F., Acevedo-Rodríguez P., Callmander M.W., Nylander J.A.A.,Harrington M., Sanmartín I., Küpfer P., Alvarez N. (2009) Plastid and nuclear DNA markers reveal intricate relationships at subfamilial and tribal levels in the soapberry family (Sapindaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 51: 238-258.
6. Buerki S., Phillipson P.B., Lowry II P.P., Callmander M.W. (2010) Molecular phylogenetics and morphological evidence support recognition of Gereaua, a new endemic genus of Sapindaceae from Madagascar. Systematic Botany 35: 172-180.
7. Buerki S., Forest F., Salamin, N., Alvarez N. (in press) Comparative performance of supertree algorithms in large datasets using the soapberry family (Sapindaceae) as a case study. Systematic Biology.
8. Chan P.-K., Mak E. (2006) A novel compound isolated from Xanthoceras sorbifolia inhibits ovarian cancer: Identification of diangeloyl groups in saponin essential for anti-tumor activity. Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research 47: 452-453.
9. Chan P.-K., Zhao M., Che C.-T., Mak E. (2008) Cytotoxic acylated triterpene saponins from the husks of Xanthoceras sorbifolia. Journal of Natural Products 71: 1247-1250.
10. Cronquist A. (1988) The evolution and classification of flowering plants, Ed. 2. New York, New York Botanical Garden Press.
11. Dahlgren G. (1989) An updated system of classification. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 100: 197-203.
12. Felsenstein J. (1985) Confidence-limits on phylogenies - an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
13. Forest F., Drouin J. N., Charest R., Brouillet L., Bruneau A. (2001) A morphological phylogenetic analysis of Aesculus L. and Billia Peyr. (Sapindaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 79: 154-169.
14. Gadek P.A., Fernando E.S., Quinn C.J., Hoot S.B., Terrazas T., Sheahan M.C., Chase M.W. (1996) Sapindales: molecular delimitation and infraordinal groups. American Journal of Botany 83: 802-811.
15. Harrington M.G., Edwards K.J., Johnson S.A., Chase M.W., Gadek P.A. (2005) Phylogenetic inference in Sapindaceae s. lat. using plastid matK and rbcL DNA sequences. Systematic Botany 30: 366-382.
16. Judd W.S., Olmstead R.G. (2004) A survey of tricolpate (eudicot) phylogenetic relationships. American Journal of Botany 91: 1627-1644.
17. Judd W.S., Sanders R.W., Donoghue M.J. (1994) Angiosperm family pairs: preliminary phylogenetic analyses. Harvard Papers in Botany 5: 1-51.
18. Klaassen R. (1999) Wood anatomy of the Sapindaceae. International Association of Wood Anatomists Journal 2 (suppl.): 1-214.
19. Müller J., Leenhouts P.W. (1976) A general survey of pollen types in Sapindaceae in relation to taxonomy. In: Ferguson I.K., Müller J. (eds) The evolutionary significance of the exine: 407-445. London, Academic Press.
20. Nixon K.C. (1999) The Parsimony Ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15: 407-414.
21. Posada D., Crandall K.A. (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
22. Radlkofer L. (1890) Ueber die Gliederung der Familie der Sapindaceen. Sitzungsberichte der Königl. Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München 20: 105-379.
23. Radlkofer L. (1933) Sapindaceae. In: Engler A. (ed.) Das Pflanzenreich: Regni Vegetabilis Conspectus (IV) 165 (Heft 98ah). Leipzig, Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.
24. Rehder A. (1935) Handeliodendron, a new genus of the Sapindaceae. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 16: 65-67.
25. Savolainen V., Fay M.F., Albach D.C., Backlund A., van der Bank M., Cameron K.M., Johnson S.A., Lledó M.D., Pintaud J.-C., Powell M., Sheahan M.C., Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., Weston P., Whitten W.M., Wurdack K.J., Chase M.W. (2000) Phylogeny of the eudicots: a newly complete familial analysis based on rbcL gene sequences. Kew Bulletin 55: 257-309.
26. Sikes D.S., Lewis P.O. (2001) PAUPRat: PAUP* implementation of the parsimony ratchet. beta software, v. 1. Distributed by the authors. Storrs, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut.
27. Stamatakis A. (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum Likelihoodbased phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688-2690.
28. Stamatakis A., Hoover P., Rougemont J. (2008) A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web-servers. Systematic Biology 57: 758-771.
29. Stevens P.F. (1997) What kind of classification should the practising taxonomist use to be saved? In: Dransfield J., Coode M.J.E., Simpson D.A. (eds) Plant diversity in Malesia III, Proceedings of the third international Flora Malesiana symposium: 295-320. Kew, Royal Botanical Garden.
30. Swofford D.L. (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), v. 4. Sunderland, Massachusetts, Sinauer Associates.
31. Takhtajan A. (1987) Systema Magnoliophytorum. Leningrad, Soviet Sciences Press.
32. Thorne R.F., Reveal J.L. (2007) An update classification of the class Magnoliopsida ("Angiospermae"). Botanical Review 73: 67-182.
33. Umadevi I., Daniel M. (1991) Chemosystematics of the Sapindaceae. Feddes Repertorium 102: 607-612.
34. von Bunge A.A. (1833) Enumeratio plantarum, quas in China Boreali collegit. Mémoires de l'Académie Impériale des Sciences de Saint Pétersbourg 2: 75-147.
35. Xia N., Gadek PA. (2007) Sapindaceae. In: Zhengyi W., Raven P.H., Deyuan, H. (eds) Flora of China: 5-24. Beijing, Science Press; St. Louis, Missouri Botanical Garden Press.