Molecular phylogenetic and morphological evidence supports recognition of gereaua, a new endemic genus of sapindaceae from madagascar

Systematic Botany

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 172-180

  Buerki, Sven ^a,e   Lowry II, Porter P ^b,c   Phillipson, Peter B ^b,c   Callmander, Martin W ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

^b MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

^c MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^d Conservatoire et Jardin Botaniques de la Ville de Genève ^*  (Switzerland)

^e CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

Gereaua; Haplocoelum; IUCN criteria; Madagascar; New genus; Sapindaceae

Indexed keywords

HAPLOCOELUM; SAPINDACEAE;

EID: 77749298087     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: 15482324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/036364410790862669     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG II) 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APGII. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 399-436.
2. Buerki, S., F. Forest, P. Acevedo-Rodríguez, M.W. Callmander, J.A.A. Nylander, M. Harrington, I. Sanmartín, P. Küpfer, and N. Alvarez. 2009. Plastid and nuclear DNA markers reveal intricate relationships at subfamilial and tribal levels in the soapberry family (Sapindaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 51: 238-258.
3. Callmander, M. W., G. E. Schatz, P. P. Lowry, P. P. II., M. O. Laivao, J. Raharimampionona, S. Andriambololonera, T. Raminosoa, and T. Consiglio. 2007. Application of IUCN Red List criteria and assessment of priority areas for plant conservation in Madagascar: rare and threatened Pandanaceae indicate new sites in need of protection. Oryx 42: 168-176.
4. Capuron, R. 1969. Révision des Sapindacées de Madagascar et des Comores. Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Série B. Botanique 19: 1-189.
5. Cornet, A. 1974. Essai de cartographie bioclimatique à Madagascar. Notice Explicative. Paris: Editions ORSTOM.
6. Davies, F.G. and B. Verdcourt. 1998. Flora of Tropical East Africa: Sapindaceae. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, Brookfield.
7. ESRI. 2000. ArcView 3.3. Redlands, California.
8. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence-limits on phylogenies - an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
9. Friis, I. 1984. Additional notes on Somalian Sapindaceae. Kew Bulletin 39: 779-783.
10. Friis, I. and K. Vollesen. 1985. The identity of Hypseloderma jubense (Sapindaceae). Kew Bulletin 40: 859-861.
11. Harrington, M.G., K.J. Edwards, S.A. Johnson, M.W. Chase, and P.A. Gadek. 2005. Phylogenetic inference in Sapindaceae sensu lato using plastid matK and rbcL DNA sequences. Systematic Botany 30: 366-382.
12. Holmgren, P.K., N.H. Holmgren, and L.C. Barnett. 1990. Index Herbariorum. Part I: The herbaria of the world. New York: New York Botanical Garden.
13. IUCN. 2001. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Gland Switzerland and Cambridge, U. K.: IUCN Species Survival Commission.
14. Kluge, A.G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology 38: 7-25.
15. Munzner, T., F. Guimbretiere, S. Tasiran, L. Zhang, and Y. Zhou. 2003. TreeJuxtaposer: scalable tree comparison using Focus, plus context with guaranteed visibility. ACM Transactions on Graphics 22: 453-462.
16. Nixon, K.C. 1999. The Parsimony Ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15: 407-414.
17. Posada, D. and K.A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
18. Radlkofer, L. 1878. Uber Sapindus und damit in Zusammenhang stehende Pflanzen. Sitzungsberichte der Mathematisch-Physikalischen Classe der K. B. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München 8: 334-338.
19. Radlkofer, L. 1933. Sapindaceae. in Das Pflanzenreich IV, 165 (Heft 98a-h), ed. A. Engler. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.
20. Schatz, G.E. 2000. Endemism in the Malagasy tree flora. Pp. 1-11 in Diversity and Endemism in Madagascar, eds. W.R. Lourenço and S.M. Goodman. Mémoires de la Société de Biogéographie, Paris: MNHN, ORSTOM.
21. Schatz, G.E., R.E. Gereau, and P.P. Lowry II. 1999. A revision of the Malagasy endemic genus Chouxia Capuron (Sapindaceae). Adansonia, série 3 21: 51-62.
22. Schatz, G.E. and M. Lescot. 2005. Gazetteer to Malagasy botanical collecting localities. Missouri Botanical Garden website (http://www.mobot.org/ MOBOT/Research/madagascar/gazetteer/).
23. Sikes, D.S. and P.O. Lewis. 2001. PAUPRAT. University of Connecticut, Storrs.
24. Soltis, D.E., P.S. Soltis, M.W. Chase, M.E. Mort, D.T. Albach, M. Zanis, V. Savolaninen, W.H. Hahn, S.B. Hoot, M.F. Fay, M. Axtell, S.M. Swensen, L.M. Prince, W.J. Kress, K.C. Nixon, and J.S. Farris. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 381-461.
25. Stamatakis, A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688-2690.
26. Stamatakis, A., P. Hoover, and J. Rougemont. 2008. Arapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web-servers. Systematic Biology 57: 758-771.
27. *and other methods), version 4. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
28. Yang, Z.H. 1993. Maximum-likelihood-estimation of phylogeny from DNA-sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10: 1396-1401.