The study of faculty productivity through confirmatory factor analysis: The case of psychology in United States of America;El estudio de productividad académica de profesores universitarios a través de análisis factorial confirmatorio: El caso de psicología en Estados Unidos de América

Universitas Psychologica

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 13-26

  García Cepero, MaríA Caridad ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DEL NORTE   (Chile)

^b PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA   (Colombia)

Author keywords

College teachers; Faculty; Higher education; Psychology; Research productivity; Scholarly productivity; Scientific productivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957126864     PISSN: 16579267     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11144/javeriana.upsy9-1.epap     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Acock, A. C. (2006, October). Zero inflated growth and latent class models using Mplus. Paper presented at the APA Workshop on New Methods for the Analysis of Family and Dyadic Process, Amherst, MA.
2. Agudelo, D., Breton-Lopez, J., Ortiz-Recio, G., Poveda-Vera, J., Teva, I., Valor-Segura, I. et al. (2003). Analysis of the scientific productivity of the Spanish psychology through the doctoral thesis [Article]. Psicothema, 15(4), 595-609.
3. Antony, J. & Raveling, J. (1999). A comparative analysis of tenure and faculty productivity: Moving beyond traditional approaches. Institute for Higher Education Law and Governance Monograph Series, 99 (3). University of Houston Law Center.
4. Belcher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual inquiry and the culture of disciplines. Milton Keynes, UK: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
5. Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 151-161.
6. Bellas, M. L. & Toutkoushian, R. K. (1999). Faculty time allocation and research productivity: Gender, race, and family effects. The Review of Higher Education, 22, 367-390.
7. Biglan, A. (1973). Relationships between subjects matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 204-213.
8. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Fundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
9. Boyer, E., Altbach, R & Whitelaw, M. (1994). The academic profession: An international perspective. Ewing, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
10. Braxton, J. M. & Del Flavero, M. (2002). Evaluating scholarship performance: Traditional and emergent assessment templates. New Directions for Institutional Research, 114, 19-31.
11. Buela-Casal, G. & Lopez, W. (2005). Evaluacion de las revistas científicas iberoamericanas de psicología. Iniciativas y estado actual. Revista La tinoamericana de Psicología, 37(1), 211-217.
12. Burke, J. C. (2005). The many faces of accountability. En J. C. Burke (Ed.), Achieving Accountability in Higher Education: Balancing Public, Academic and Market Demands (pp. 1-24). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Carayol, N. & Matt, M. (2004). Does research organization influence academic production? Laboratory level evidence from a large European university. Research Policy, 33, 1081-1102.
14. Carayol, N. &Matt, M. (2006). Individual and collective determinants of academic scientists' productivity, Information Economics and Policy, 18, 55-72.
15. rd ed.). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Cooper, M. & Turpm, G. (2007). Clinical psychology trainees' research productivity and publications: An initial survey and contributing factors [Article]. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 14(1), 54-62.
17. Crepon, B. & Duguet, E. (1997). Research and development, competition and innovation pseudo-maximum likelihood and simulated maximum likelihood methods applied to count data models with heterogeneity. Journal of Econometrics, 79, 355-378.
18. Crosta, R M. & Packman, I. G. (2005). Faculty productivity in supervising doctoral students' dissertations at Cornel University. Economics of Education Review, 24, 55-65.
19. Dundar H. & Lewis D. R. (1998). Determinants of Research Productivity in Higher Education. Research in Higher Education, 39, 607-631.
20. Fogg, P. (2007). A new Standard for Measuring Doctoral Programs. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(19), 8-13.
21. García Martínez, A. T., Guerrero Bote, V., Hassan, Montero, Y. & Moya Anegon, F. (2009). La psicología en el dominio científico español a través del análisis de cocitación de revistas. Universitas Psychologica, 8 (1), 13-26.
22. García Martínez, A. T., Guerrero Bote, V., Vargas Quesada, B. &Moya Anegon, F. (2008a). La psicologia en el dominio científico español a través de la cocitacion de categorias del Journal citation Report 1990-2005. Psicohtema, 20(3), 465 373.
23. García Martínez, A. T., Guerrero Bote, V., Vargas Que-sada, B. & Moya Anegon, F. (2008b). La psicologia en el cienciograma de los países iberoamericanos. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 40(3), 409 424.
24. Garcia, J. N., Rodriguez, C. & Gonzalez, L. (2005). Valoración de la difusión en doce revistas de educación en español: análisis del factor de impacto y otros índices bibliométricos. Aula Abierta, 85, 3-44.
25. García-Cepero, M. C. (2007). Institutional and Individual Factors Associated with Faculty Scholarly Productivity. Dissertation Abstracts International (AAT 3276618).
26. García-Cepero, M. C. (2008) Panorama de las publicaciones seriadas y produc ción académica en el área de Educación, Iberoamérica. Magis, Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 1(1), 13-30.
27. Kwok, K. (1998). Research output among the three faculties of business, education, humanities and social science in six Hong Kong Universities. Higher Education, 36, 195-208.
28. Lambert, D. (1992). Zero Inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics, 34, 1-14.
29. Lau, M. Y., Cisco, H. C. & Delgado-Romero, E. A. (2008). Institutional and individual research productivity in five nominated multicultural psychology journals.
30. Levin, S. G & Stephan, R E. (1991). Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientist. The American Economic Review, 81, 114-132.
31. Long, J. (1990). The origins of sex differences in science. Social Forces, 64, 1297-1316.
32. Long, J. (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Londres: Sage Publications Inc.
33. Maripani, J. (2007). Efficiency in higher education: An analysis of the "traditional universities" in Chile. Dissertation Abstracts International (AAT 3270965).
34. Middaugh, M. (2001). Understanding faculty productivity: Standards and benchmarks for colleges and universities. San Francisco: Jossy Bass.
35. Musi-Lechuga, B., Olivas-Avila, J. A. & Buela-Casal, G. (2009). One Scientific productivity of Doctorate programs in Clinical and Health Psychology in Spain. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 9(1), 161-173.
36. Muthén, B. (2005, March 21). Obtaining factor scores. Message posted to http://www.statmodel.com/discussion/messages/9/397.html?117673537
37. Pla, A. (2001). Evaluación económica pública de la productividad de la universidad. Tesis doctoral no publicada, Universidad de Valencia, España.
38. Porter, S. &Umbach, R. (2001). Analyzing faculty workload data using multilevel modeling. Research in Higher Education, 42, 171-196.
39. Ridout, M., Hinde, J. & DeméAtrio, C. G. B. (2001). A score test for testing a Zero Inflated Poisson regression model against Zero Inflated Negative Binomial alternatives. Biometrics, 57, 219-223.
40. Rivera-Garzón, D. M. (2008). Caracterización de la comunidad científica de Psicología que publica en la revista Universitas Psychologica (2002-2008). Universitas Psychologica, 7(3), 917-932.
41. Salgado, J. E & Paez, D. (2007). Scientific productivity and Hirschs h index of Spanish social psychology: Convergence between productivity indexes and comparison with other areas. Psicothema, 19(2), 179-189.
42. Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., King, J., Nora, A. & Barlow, E. A. (2006). Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-331.
43. Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product person and process perspectives. Pyschological Bulletin, 129, 475-494.
44. Simonton, D. K. (2009). Applying the Psychology of Science to the Science of Psychology: Can Psychologists Use Psychological Science to Enhance Psychology as a Science? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(1), 2-4.
45. Stewart, R K., Roberts, M. C. & Roy, K. M. (2007). Scholarly productivity in clinical psychology PhD programs: A normative assessment of publication rates [Review]. Clinical Psychology-Science and Practice, 14(2), 157-171.
46. Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
47. Townsend, B. K. & Rosser, V. J. (2007, April). Initial measures of faculty productivity as evidenced in NSO-PF data. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
48. Williams, H. A. (2003). A mediated hierarchical regression analysis of factors related to research productivity of human resource education and workforce development postsecondary faculty. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University.