Challenging the triple helix model of regional innovation systems: A venture-centric model

International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 257-277

  Brännback, Malin ^a   Carsrud, Alan ^b   Krueger, Norris ^c   Elfving, Jennie ^a  

^a ÅBO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Entrepreneurship Northwest   (United States)

Author keywords

entrepreneurship; innovation systems; technology development; triple helix

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957100931     PISSN: 17465370     EISSN: 17465389     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJTE.2008.020539     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Acs, Z.J., Arenius, P., Hay, M. and Minniti, M. (2005) GEM 2004 Executive Report, www.gemconsortium.org
2. Aldrich, H.E. and Martinez, M.A. (2001) ‘Many are called but few are chosen: an evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 24, pp.41–56.
3. Arrow, K.J. (1962) ‘Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention’, in Nelson, R.R. (Ed.): The Rate & Direction of Inventive Activity: 609-625, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
4. Autio, E. (2005) GEM 2005 High Expectation-Entrepreneurship Summary Report, www.gemconsortium.org
5. Autio, E., Hameri, A-P. and Vuola, O. (2004) ‘A framework of industrial knowledge spillovers in big-science centers’, Research Policy, Vol. 33, pp.107–126.
6. Bathelt, H. (2001) ‘Regional competence and economic recovery: divergent growth paths in Boston’s high technology economy’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Vol. 13, pp.287–314.
7. Bird, B. (1988) ‘Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: the case for intentions’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13, pp.442–454.
8. Brännback, M., Hyvönen, P., Raunio, H., Renko, M. and Sutinen, R. (2001) Finnish Pharma Cluster – Vision 2010, Target Programme initiated by the Finnish Pharma Cluster, TEKES Technology Review No. 112/2001.
9. Brännback, M., Jalkanen, M., Kurkela, K. and Soppi, E. (2004) Securing Pharma Development in Finland Today and in 2015, TEKES Technology Review No. 163, Helsinki.
10. Brännback, M., Carsrud, A. and Renko, M. (2007) ‘Born or grow global: exploring the concept of born global in the biotechnology context’, Journal of Enterprising Culture, Vol. 15, pp.79–100.
11. Carlsson, B. (2006) ‘Internationalization of innovation systems: a survey of the literature’, Research Policy, Vol. 35, pp.56–67.
12. Carlsson, B. and Eliasson, G. (2003) ‘Industrial dynamics and endogenous growth’, Industry and Innovation, Vol. 10, pp.435–455.
13. Carlsson, B. and Stankiewicz, R. (1991) ‘On the nature, function, and composition of technological systems’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 1, pp.93–118.
14. Carsrud, A. and Ellison, B. (1992) ‘Turning academic research into enterprise: an exploratory study of the United Kingdom’, in Schwartz, R.M. (Ed.): Managing Organizational Transitions in a Global Economy, Institute of Industrial Relations/UCLA Press, Los Angeles, pp.119–148.
15. Casson, M. (1982) The Entrepreneur an Economic Theory, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, UK.
16. Cooke, P. (2005) ‘Regional asymmetric knowledge capabilities & open innovation. Exploring ‘globalisation 2’: a new model of industry organisation’, Research Policy, Vol. 34, pp.1128–1149.
17. Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. (1990) ‘Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, pp.128–152.
18. Curran, J. (2000) ‘What is small business in the UK for? evaluation and assessing small business policies’, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 18, pp.36–50.
19. Deeds, D., DeCarolis, D. and Coombs, J. (1999) ‘Dynamic capabilities and new product development in high technology ventures: an empirical analysis of new biotechnology firms’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 15, pp.211–229.
20. Dosi, G. and Orseniego, L. (1988) ‘Coordination and transformation: an overview of structures, behaviours and changes in evolutionary environments’, in Dosi, G. et al. (Eds.): Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter Publishers, London, pp.13–37.
21. Drucker, P.F. (1985) Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Harper Business, New York.
22. Duncan, J.W. and Handler, D.P. (1994) ‘The misunderstood role of small business’, Business Economics, Vol. 29, pp.1–6.
23. Elster, J. (1989) Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences, Cambridge Press, Cambridge.
24. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000) ‘The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations’, Research Policy, Vol. 29, pp.109–123.
25. Etzkowitz, H. and Klofsten, M. (2005) ‘The innovating region: toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development’, R&D Management, Vol. 35, pp.243–255.
26. Feldman, M.P. (1994) ‘The university and economic development: the case of John Hopkins university and Baltimore’, Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 8, pp.67–76.
27. Felin, T. and Hesterly, W.S. (2007) ‘The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity & new value creation: philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, pp.195–218.
28. Freeman, C. (2002) ‘Continental, national & sub-national innovation systems: complementarity & economic growth’, Research Policy, Vol. 31, pp.191–211.
29. Global Competitiveness Report 2005-2006 (2005) www.weuforum.org
30. Henry, C., Hill, F. and Leitch, C. (2003) ‘Developing a coherent enterprise support policy: a new challenge for governments’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol. 21, pp.3–19.
31. Höyssä, M., Bruun, H. and Hukkinen, J. (2004) ‘Co-evolution of social & physical infrastructure for biotechnology innovation in Turku, Finland’, Research Policy, Vol. 33, pp.769–785.
32. Katz, J. and Gartner, W. (1988) ‘Properties of emerging organizations’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13, pp.429–441.
33. Kim, J. (1993) Supervenience and Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
34. Kirzner, I.M. (1973) Competition and Entrepreneurship Chicago, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
35. Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1993) ‘Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation’, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 24, pp.625–645.
36. Krueger, N.F. (1993) ‘The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability’, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Vol. 18, pp.5–21.
37. Krueger, N.F. (2000) ‘The cognitive infrastructure of opportunity emergence’, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Vol. 24, pp.5–23.
38. Krueger, N.F. and Brazeal, D.V. (1994) ‘Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs’, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Vol. 18, pp.91–103.
39. Krueger, N.F., Reilly, M.D. and Carsrud.A.L. (2000) ‘Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 15, pp.411–432.
40. Lichtenstein, G.A. and Lyons, T.S. (2001) ‘The entrepreneurial development system’, Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 15, pp.3–20.
41. Lichtenstein, G.A., Lyons, T.S. and Kutzhanova, N. (2004) ‘Building entrepreneurial communities: the appropriate role of enterprise development activities’, Journal of the Community Development Society, Vol. 35, pp.1–20.
42. McMillan, G.S., Narin, F. and Deeds, D.L. (2000) ‘An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovations: the case of biotechnology’, Research Policy, Vol. 29, pp.1–8.
43. von Mises, L. (1949) Human Action, Contemporary Books, Chicago.
44. Motohashi, K. (2005) ‘University-industry collaboration in Japan: new technology-based firms in transforming the national innovation system’, Research Policy, Vol. 34, pp.583–594.
45. Murray, F. (2002) ‘Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering’, Research Policy, Vol. 31, pp.1389–1403.
46. Nelson, R.R. (1992) ‘National innovation systems: a retrospective on a study’, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 1, pp.347–374.
47. Niosi, J. (1991) ‘Canada’s national system of innovation’, Science and Public Policy, Vol. 18, pp.83–93.
48. Niosi, J. (2002) ‘National systems of innovation are ‘x-efficient’ (and x-effective): Why some are slow learners’, Research Policy, Vol. 31, pp.291–302.
49. Pages, E. (2001) Building Entrepreneurial Networks, National Commission on Entrepreneurship, Washington, DC, www.entreworks.net
50. Reynolds, P. (2005) 2004 Assessment of Entrepreneurship in the US, Entrepreneurship Research Institute, Eugenio Pino & Family Global Entrepreneurship Center, Florida International University, Miami, Florida.
51. Reynolds, P.D. and White, S.B. (1997) The Entrepreneurial Process: Economic Growth, Men, Women, and Minorities, Quorum Books, Westport CT.
52. Riccaboni, M. and Pammolli, F. (2002) ‘Firm growth in networks’, Research Policy, Vol. 31, pp.1405–1416.
53. Sawyer, R.K. (2001) ‘Emergence in sociology: contemporary philosophy of mind and some implications for sociological theory’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 107, pp.551–585.
54. Saxenian, A. (1994) Regional Advantage, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
55. Shane, S. (2003) A General Theory of Entrepreneurship, Edgar Elgar, Cheltenham.
56. Schumpeter, J. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development, Oxford Press, Oxford.
57. Simon, H. (1991) ‘Bounded rationality and organizational learning’, Organization Science, Vol. 2, pp.125–134.
58. Stevenson, H.H. and Jarillo, J.C. (1989) ‘A paradigm of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial management’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11, pp.17–27.
59. Sweeney, G. (1987) Innovation, Entrepreneurs and Regional Development, St. Martin’s, NY.
60. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997) ‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, pp.509–533.
61. Thierstein, A. and Wilhelm, B. (2001) ‘Incubator, technology and innovation centres in Switzerland: features and policy implications’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Vol. 13, pp.315–331.
62. Westhead, P., Batstone, S. and Martin, F. (2000) ‘Technology-based firms located on science parks: the applicability of Bullok’s ‘Soft-Hard’ model’, Enterprise and Innovations Management Studies, Vol. 1, pp.1–18.
63. Zucker, L., Darby, M. and Armstrong, J. (2002) ‘Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture and firm performance in biotechnology’, Management Science, Vol. 48, pp.138–153.
64. Zucker, L., Darby, M. and Brewer, M. (1998) ‘Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises’, American Economic Review, Vol. 88, pp.290–306.