Near infrared spectroscopy as an on-line method to quantitatively determine glycogen and predict ultimate pH in pre rigor bovine M. longissimus dorsi

Meat Science

Volumn 86, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 999-1004

  Lomiwes, D ^a   Reis, M M ^a   Wiklund, E ^a   Young, O A ^b   North, M ^b  

^a RUAKURA RESEARCH CENTRE   (New Zealand)

^b AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Beef; Glycogen; Near infrared spectroscopy; Pre rigor; Ultimate pH

Indexed keywords

GLYCOGEN; HIGH PH; LONGISSIMUS; LOW CORRELATION; MEASURED DATA; NEAR INFRARED; NIR SPECTRUM; ONLINE METHODS; POST MORTEM; PRE RIGOR; QUALITATIVE MODEL; QUANTITATIVE MODELS; ULTIMATE PH;

FORECASTING; MEATS; NEAR INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY;

INFRARED DEVICES;

GLYCOGEN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CADAVER; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; EVALUATION; FOOD ANALYSIS; MEAT; METHODOLOGY; NEAR INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; PH; SKELETAL MUSCLE;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; FOOD ANALYSIS; GLYCOGEN; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MEAT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; POSTMORTEM CHANGES; RIGOR MORTIS; SPECTROSCOPY, NEAR-INFRARED;

BOVINAE;

EID: 77956918131     PISSN: 03091740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.08.007     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Andersen J.R., Borggaard C., Rasmussen A.J., Houmøller L.P. Optical measurements of pH in meat. Meat Science 1999, 53(2):135-141.
2. Andrés S., Silva A., Soares-Pereira A.L., Martins C., Bruno-Soares A.M., Murray I. The use of visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy to predict beef M. longissimus thoracis et lumborum quality attributes. Meat Science 2008, 78(3):217-224.
3. Braggins T.J. Effect of stress-related changes in sheepmeat ultimate pH on cooked odor and flavor. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 1996, 44(8):2352-2360.
4. Brøndum J., Munck L., Henckel P., Karlsson A., Tornberg E., Engelsen S.B. Prediction of water-holding capacity and composition of porcine meat by comparative spectroscopy. Meat Science 2000, 55(2):177-185.
5. Devine C.E. Incidence of high pH beef and lamb I: Implications for meat quality. Twenty-eighth meat industry research conference 1994, 118-123. MIRINZ, Hamilton.
6. Ding B., Gentleman R. Classification using generalized partial least squares. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 2005, 14(2):280-298.
7. Dransfield E. Eating quality of DFD beef. The problem with dark-cutting beef 1981, 344-358. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague. D.E. Hood, P.V. Tarrant (Eds.).
8. Dreiling C.E., Brown D.E., Casale L., Kelly L. Muscle glycogen: Comparison of iodine binding and enzyme digestion assays and application to meat samples. Meat Science 1987, 20(3):167-177.
9. Fernandez X., Tornberg E. A review of the causes of variation in muscle glycogen content and ultimate pH in pigs. Journal of Muscle Foods 1991, 2(3):209-235.
10. Forrest J.C., Morgan M.T., Borggaard C., Rasmussen A.J., Jespersen B.L., Andersen J.R. Development of technology for the early post mortem prediction of water holding capacity and drip loss in fresh pork. Meat Science 2000, 55(1):115-122.
11. Gill C.O., Newton K.G. Microbiology of DFD meat. The problem of dark-cutting in beef 1981, 305-327. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague. D.E. Hood, P.V. Tarrant (Eds.).
12. Graafhuis A.E., Devine C.E. Incidence of high pH beef and lamb II: Results of an ultimate pH survey of beef and sheep plants in New Zealand. Twenty-eighth meat industry research conference 1994, 133-141. MIRINZ, Hamilton.
13. Immonen K., Ruusunen M., Puolanne E. Some effects of residual glycogen concentration on the physical and sensory quality of normal pH beef. Meat Science 2000, 55(1):33-38.
14. Jeremiah L.E., Tong A.K.W., Gibson L.L. The usefulness of muscle color and pH for segregating beef carcasses into tenderness groups. Meat Science 1991, 30(2):97-114.
15. Kastner C.L. Hot processing: update on potential energy and related economies. Proceedings Meat Ind. Res. Conf, Arlington, VA 1977, 43-51.
16. Kastner C.L. Hot processing-Overview. Proceedings Int. Symposium Meat Sci. Technol., Lincoln, USA 1982, 149-168.
17. Liu Y., Lyon B.G., Windham W.R., Realini C.E., Pringle T.D.D., Duckett S. Prediction of color, texture, and sensory characteristics of beef steaks by visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. A feasibility study. Meat Science 2003, 65(3):1107-1115.
18. Ockerman H.W., Basu L., Werner Klinth J. Carcass chilling and boning. Encyclopedia of meat sciences 2004, 144-149. Elsevier, Oxford.
19. Prieto N., Andrés S., Giráldez F.J., Mantecón A.R., Lavín P. Ability of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) to estimate physical parameters of adult steers (oxen) and young cattle meat samples. Meat Science 2008, 79(4):692-699.
20. Pryzbylski W., Venin P., Monin G. Relationship between glycolytic potential and ultimate pH in bovine, porcine and ovine muscles. Journal of Muscle Foods 1994, 5245-5255.
21. Pulford D.J., Fraga Vazquez S., Frost D.F., Fraser-Smith E., Dobbie P., Rosenvold K. The intracellular distribution of small heat shock proteins in post-mortem beef is determined by ultimate pH. Meat Science 2008, 79(4):623-630.
22. Purchas R.W., Aungsupakorn R. Further investigations into the relationship between ultimate pH and tenderness for beef samples from bulls and steers. Meat Science 1993, 34(2):163-178.
23. Purslow P.P. Intramuscular connective tissue and its role in meat quality. Meat Science 2005, 70(3):435-447.
24. Reis M.M., Araújo P.H.H., Sayer C., Giudici R. Spectroscopic on-line monitoring of reactions in dispersed medium: Chemometric challenges. Analytica Chimica Acta 2007, 595(1-2):257-265.
25. Rosenvold K., Micklander E., Hansen P.W., Burling-Claridge R., Challies M., Devine C., et al. Temporal, biochemical and structural factors that influence beef quality measurement using near infrared spectroscopy. Meat Science 2009, 82(3):379-388.
26. Savenije B., Geesink G.H., van der Palen J.G.P., Hemke G. Prediction of pork quality using visible/near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Meat Science 2006, 73(1):181-184.
27. Silva J.A., Patarata L., Martins C. Influence of ultimate pH on bovine meat tenderness during ageing. Meat Science 1999, 52(4):453-459.
28. Viljoen H.F., de Kock H.L., Webb E.C. Consumer acceptability of dark, firm and dry (DFD) and normal pH beef steaks. Meat Science 2002, 61(2):181-185.
29. Watanabe A., Daly C.C., Devine C.E. The effects of the ultimate pH of meat on tenderness changes during ageing. Meat Science 1996, 42(1):67-78.
30. Wiklund E., Farouk M., Stuart A., Dobbie P., Lomiwes D., Frost D. Survey of current pH status in New Zealand bull beef. Proceedings 55th international congress of meat science and technology, Copenhagen 2009, 221-223.
31. Young O.A., Thomson R.D., Merhtens V.G., Loeffen M.P.F. Industrial application to cattle of a method for the early determination of meat ultimate pH. Meat Science 2004, 67(1):107-112.
32. Young O.A., West J., Hart A.L., van Otterdijk F.F.H. A method for early determination of meat ultimate pH. Meat Science 2004, 66(2):493-498.