Influence of a programme of professional calibration in the variability of landmark identification using cone beam computed tomography-synthesized and conventional radiographic cephalograms

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 414-423

  Delamare, E L ^a   Liedke, G S ^a   Vizzotto, M B ^a   Da Silveira, H L D ^a   Ribeiro, J L D ^a   Silveira, H E D ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cephalometric landmark; Cone beam computed tomography; Error

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 77956894518     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/31924248     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Greiner M, Greiner A, Hirschfelder U. Variance of landmarks in digital evaluations: comparison between CT-based and conventional digital lateral cephalometric radiographs. J Orofac Orthop 2007; 68: 290-298.
2. Kamoen A, Dermaut L, Verbeeck R. The clinical significance of error measurement in the interpretation of treatment results. Eur J Orthod 2001; 23: 569-578.
3. Trpkova B, Major P, Prasad N, Nebbe B. Cephalometric landmarks identification and reproducibility: a meta analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 112: 165-170.
4. Chen YJ, Chen SK, Chang HF, Chen KC. Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computeraided digital cephalometry. Angle Orthod 2000; 70: 387-392.
5. Turner PJ, Weerakone S. An evaluation of the reproducibility of landmark identification using scanned cephalometric images. J Orthod 2001; 28: 221-229.
6. Schulze RK, Gloede MB, Doll GM. Landmark identification on direct digital versus film-based cephalometric radiographs: a human skull study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122: 635-642.
7. Chen YJ, Chen SK, Huang HW, Yao CC, Chang HF. Reliability of landmark identification in cephalometric radiography acquired by a storage phosphor imaging system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 301-306.
8. Lou L, Lagravere MO, Compton S, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104: 402-411.
9. Moshiri M, Scarfe WC, Hilgers ML, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132: 550-560.
10. Cattaneo PM, Bloch CB, Calmar D, Hjortshoj M, Melsen B. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134: 798-802.
11. Kumar V, Ludlow J, Soares Cevidanes LH, Mol A. In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 873-879.
12. van Vlijmen OJ, Berge SJ, Swennen GR, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 92-97.
13. de Oliveira AE, Cevidanes LH, Phillips C, Motta A, Burke B, Tyndall D. Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: 256-265.
14. Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, Hirsch E. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 640 e641-645.
15. Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 387-395.
16. Kragskov J, Bosch C, Gyldensted C, Sindet-Pedersen S. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997; 34: 111-116.
17. Chidiac JJ, Shofer FS, Al-Kutoub A, Laster LL, Ghafari J. Comparison of CT scanograms and cephalometric radiographs in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 2002; 5: 104-113.
18. Swennen GR, Schutyser F. Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130: 410-416.
19. El-Fegh I, Galhood M, Sid-Ahmed M, Ahmadi M. Automated 2- D cephalometric analysis of X-ray by image registration approach based on least square approximator. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008; 2008: 3949-3952.
20. Rueda S, Alcaniz M. An approach for the automatic cephalometric landmark detection using mathematical morphology and active appearance models. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2006; 9: 159-166.
21. Liu JK, Chen YT, Cheng KS. Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118: 535-540.
22. Perillo M, Beideman R, Shofer F, Jacobsson-Hunt U, Higgins-Barber K, Laster L, et al. Effect of landmark identification on cephalometric measurements: guidelines for cephalometric analyses. Clin Orthod Res 2000; 3: 29-36.
23. Chen YJ, Chen SK, Yao JC, Chang HF. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry. Angle Orthod 2004; 74: 155-161.
24. Yu SH, Nahm DS, Baek SH. Reliability of landmark identification on monitor-displayed lateral cephalometric images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: e790-796; discussion e791.
25. Arponen H, Elf H, Evalahti M, Waltimo-Siren J. Reliability of cranial base measurements on lateral skull radiographs. Orthod Craniofac Res 2008; 11: 201-210.
26. Silveira HL, Silveira HE, Dalla-Bona RR, Abdala DD, Bertoldi RF, von Wangenheim A. Software system for calibrating examiners in cephalometric point identification. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135: 400-405.
27. da Silveira HL, Silveira HE. Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements made by three radiology clinics. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 394-399.
28. Farman AG, Scarfe WC. Development of imaging selection criteria and procedures should precede cephalometric assessment with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130: 257-265.
29. Silveira HLD, Gomes MJ, Dalla-bona RR, Silveira HED. Evaluation of the radiographic cephalometry learning process by a learning virtual object. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 134-138.
30. Zeller RA YY. 22 Power: establishing the optimum sample size. Handbook of statistics. Elsevier, Oxford 2007, pp 656-678.
31. Athanasiou AE, Miethke R, Van Der Meij AJ. Random errors in localization of landmarks in postero-anterior cephalograms. Br J Orthod 1999; 26: 273-284.
32. Sayinsu K, Isik F, Trakyali G, Arun T. An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings. Eur J Orthod 2007; 29: 105-108.
33. Roden-Johnson D, English J, Gallerano R. Comparison of handtraced and computerized cephalograms: landmark identification, measurement, and superimposition accuracy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 556-564.
34. Moreira CR, Sales MA, Lopes PM, Cavalcanti MG. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional conebeam computed tomographic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108: 430-436.
35. Swennen GR, Schutyser F, Barth EL, De Groeve P, De Mey A. A new method of 3-D cephalometry Part I: the anatomic Cartesian 3-D reference system. J Craniofac Surg 2006; 17: 314-325.
36. Lagravere MO, Major PW. Proposed reference point for 3- dimensional cephalometric analysis with cone-beam computerized tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128: 657-660.