The clinical significance of error measurement in the interpretation of treatment results

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 569-578

  Kamoen, A ^a   Dermaut, L ^a   Verbeeck, R ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CEPHALOMETRY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ALGORITHMS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CALIBRATION; CEPHALOMETRY; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0035489644     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/23.5.569     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bailar J C, Mosteller F 1992 Medical uses of statistics, 2nd edn. NEJM Books, Boston
2. Battagel J M 1993 A comparative assessment of cephalometric errors. European Journal of Orthodontics 15: 305-314
3. Baumrind S, Frantz R C 1971a The reliability of head film measurements 1. Landmark identification. American Journal of Orthodontics 60: 111-127
4. Baumrind S, Frantz R C 1971b The reliability of head film measurements 2. Conventional angular and linear measurements. American Journal of Orthodontics 60: 505-517
5. Cooke M S, Wei S H Y 1991 Cephalometric errors: a comparison between repeat measurements and retaken radiographs. Australian Dental Journal 36: 38-43
6. Dahlberg G 1940 Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Interscience Publications, New York
7. Darryl N D, Frances M 1991 Reliability of cephalometric analysis using manual and interactive computer methods. British Journal of Orthodontics 18: 105-109
8. Dermaut L R, van den Eynde F, De Pauw G 1992 Skeletal and dento-alveolar changes as a result of headgear activator therapy related to different vertical growth patterns. European Journal of Orthodontics 14: 140-146
9. Downs W B 1956 Analysis of the dentofacial profile. Angle Orthodontist 26: 191-212
10. Gratt B M, Sickles E A, Littman R I 1985 Comparison of dental xeroradiography and conventional film techniques for the frequency and significance of image artefacts. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 60: 546-552
11. Hatton M E, Grainger R M 1958 Reliability of measurements from cephalograms at the Burlington Orthodontic Research Center. Journal of Dental Research 37: 853-859
12. Haynes S, Chau N Y 1993 Inter- and intra-observer identification of landmarks used in the Delaire analysis. European Journal of Orthodontics 15: 79-84
13. Houston W J B 1983a The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. American Journal of Orthodontics 83: 382-390
14. Houston W J B 1983b Walther's orthodontic notes, 4th edn. Wright PSG, Bristol
15. Houston W J B, Maher R E, McElroy D, Sherriff M 1986 Sources of error in measurements from cephalometric radiographs. European Journal of Orthodontics 8: 149-151
16. Jackson P H, Dickson G C, Birnie D J 1985 Digital image processing of cephalometric radiographs: a preliminary report. British Journal of Orthodontics 12: 122-132
17. Kirkwood B R 1988 Essentials of medical statistics. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford
18. Levene H 1960 Robust tests for equality of variances. Contribution to probability and statistics. Stanford University Press, Stanford
19. MacriÌ V, Wenzel A 1993 Reliability of landmark recording on film and digital lateral cephalograms. European Journal of Orthodontics 15: 137-148
20. MidtgaÌ�rd J, BjoÌrk G, Linder-Aronson S 1974 Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks and errors of measurements of cephalometric cranial distances. Angle Orthodontist 44: 56-61
21. Ricketts R M 1970 Analysis - the interim. Angle Orthodontist 40: 129-137
22. Riegelman R K, Hirsch R P 1989 Studying a study and testing a test. How to read the medical literature. Little Brown and Company, Boston
23. Riolo M L, Moyers R E, McNamara Jr J A, Hunter W S 1974 An atlas of craniofacial growth, Monograph No. 2, Craniofacial Growth Series. Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
24. Ruppenthal T, Doll G, Sergl H G, Fricke B 1991 Vergleichende Untersuchung zur Genauigkeit der Lokalisierung Kephalometrischer Referenzpunkte bei Anwendung digitaler und konventioneller Aufnahmetechnik. Fortschritte der KieferorthopaÌdie 52: 289-296
25. Stabrun A E, Danielsen K 1982 Precision in cephalometric landmark identification. European Journal of Orthodontics 4: 185-196
26. Steiner C C 1953 Cephalometrics for you and me. American Journal of Orthodontics 39: 729-755
27. Swinscow T D V 1981 Elementaire statistiek. Stafleu's Wetenschappelijke uitgeversmaatschappij B.V. Alphen aan de Rijn, Brussel
28. Tweed C H 1969 The diagnostic facial triangle in the control of treatment objectives. American Journal of Orthodontics 55: 651-667
29. van Beek H 1982 Overjet correction by a combined headgear and activator. European Journal of Orthodontics 4: 279-290