Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements made by three radiology clinics

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 394-399

  Dias Da Silveira, Heraldo Luis ^a   Dias Silveira, Heloisa Emilia ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cephalometric analysis; Cephalometry; Landmark identification; Reproducibility of results

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646462581     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Langlade M. Cefalometria Ortodôntica. São Paulo, Brazil: Editora Santos; 1993:269.
2. Moyers RE. Handbook of orthodontics. 4th ed. Chicago, Ill: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1988:577.
3. Richardson A. An investigation into the reproducibility of some points, planes and lines used in cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod. 1966;52:637-651.
4. Vion PE. Anatomia Cefalométrica. 2nd ed. São Paulo, Brazil: Editora Santos; 2002:173.
5. Rudolph DJ, Sinclair PM, Coggins JM. Automatic computerized radiographic identification of cephalometric landmarks. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:173-179.
6. Chen SK, Chen YJ, Yao JC, Chang HF. Enhanced speed and precision of measurement in a computer-assisted digital cephalometric analysis system. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:501-507.
7. Tng TT, Chan TC, Hägg U, Cooke MS. Validity of cephalometric landmarks. An experimental study on human skulls. Eur J Orthod. 1994;16:110-120.
8. Trenouth MJ, Laitung G, Naftel AJ. Differences in cephalometric reference values between five centers: relevance to the Eurocleft Study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;37:19-24.
9. Chan CK, Tng TH, Hägg U, Cooke MS. Effects of cephalometric landmark validity on incisor angulation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;106:487-495.
10. Lau PY, Cooke MS, Hägg U. Effect of training and experience on cephalometric measurement errors on surgical patients. Int J Adult Orthodont Orthognath Surg. 1997;12:204-213.
11. Ongkosuwito EM, Katsaros C, van't Hof MA, Bodegom JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. The reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of analogue and digital methods. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24:655-665.
12. Trpkova B, Major P, Prasad N, Nebbe B. Cephalometric landmarks identification and reproducibility: a meta analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:165-170.
13. Kamoen A, Dermaut L, Verbeeck R. The clinical significance of error measurement in the interpretation of treatment results. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23:569-578.
14. Cooke MS, Wei SH. Cephalometric errors: a comparison between repeat measurements and retaken radiographs. Aust Dent J. 1991;36:38-43.
15. Midtgard J, Bjork G, Linder-Aronson S. Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks and errors of measurements of cephalometric cranial distances. Angle Orthod. 1974;44:56-61.
16. Chen YJ, Chen SK, Yao JC, Chang HF. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:155-161.
17. Major PW, Johnson DE, Hesse KL, Glover KE. Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:447-454.
18. Hägg U, Cooke MS, Chan TC, Tng TT, Lau PY. The reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks: an experimental study on skulls. Aust Orthod J. 1998;15:177-185.
19. Schulze RK, Gloede MB, Doll GM. Landmark identification on direct digital versus film-based cephalometric radiographs: a human skull study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:635-642.
20. Chen YJ, Chen SK, Chang HF, Chen KC. Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:387-392.