An evaluation of the reproducibility of landmark identification using scanned cephalometric images

Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 221-229

  Turner, P J ^a   Weerakone, S ^b  

^a WARWICK HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BIRMINGHAM NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computerized cephalometric analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; VALIDATION STUDY;

CEPHALOMETRY; HUMANS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHIC MAGNIFICATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0035462460     PISSN: 14653125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ortho/28.3.221     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Baumrind, S. and Frantz, R. C. (1971a) The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark Identification, American Journal of Orthodontics, 60, 111-127.
2. Baumrind, S. and Frantz, R. C. (1971b) The reliability of head film measurements. 2. Conventional angular and linear measure, American Journal of Orthodontics, 60, 505-517.
3. Buckwalter, K.A. and Braunstein, E. M. (1992) Digital skeletal radiography, American Journal of Roentgenology, 158, 1071-1080.
4. Cohen, A. M. (1984) Uncertainty in cephalometrics, British Journal of Orthodontics, 11, 44-48.
5. Cohen, A. M. and Linney, A. D. (1986) A low cost system for computer-based cephalometric analysis, British Journal of Orthodontics, 13, 105-108.
6. Cohen, A. M., Ip, H. H-S. and Linney, A. D. (1984) A preliminary study of computer recognition and identification of skeletal landmarks as a new method of cephalometric analysis, British Journal of Orthodontics, 11, 143-154.
7. Cowen, A. R.,Workman, A. and Price, J. S. (1993) Physical aspects of photostimulable phosphor computed radiography, British Journal of Radiology, 66, 332-345. (Pubitemid 23120028)
8. Geelan,W.,Wenzel, A., Gotfredsen, E., Kruger,M. and Hansson, L-G. (1998) Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy, and monitor-displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor technique, European Journal of Orthodontics, 20, 331-340. (Pubitemid 128492290)
9. Houston,W. J. B. (1982) A comparison of the reliability of measurement of cephalometric radiographs by tracings and direct digitization, Swedish Dental Journal Supplement, 15, 99-103.
10. Houston,W. J. B.,Mayer, R. E., McElroy, D. and Sherriff, M. (1986) Sources of error in measurements from cephalometric radiographs, European Journal of Orthodontics, 8, 149-151.
11. Jackson, P. H., Dickson, G. C. and Birnie, D. J. (1985) Digital image processing of cephalometric radiographs: A preliminary report, British Journal of Orthodontics, 12, 122-132.
12. Lowey, M. N. (1993) The development of a new method of cephalometric and study cast mensuration with a computer controlled, video image capture system: Part I, British Journal of Orthodontics, 20, 203-214.
13. Midtgård, J., Björk, G. and Linder-Aronson, S. (1974) Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks and errors of measurements of cephalometric cranial distances, Angle Orthodontist, 44, 56-61.
14. Richardson, A. (1981) A comparison of traditional and computerized methods of cephalometric analysis, European Journal of Orthodontics, 3, 15-20. (Pubitemid 11186996)
15. Sandler, P. J. (1988) Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements, British Journal of Orthodontics, 15, 105-110.