Single-input-dual-output modeling of image-based input function estimation

Molecular Imaging and Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 286-294

  Su, Yi ^a   Shoghi, Kooresh I ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Compartment model; Input function; PET; Small animal imaging

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COMPARTMENT MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MOLECULAR IMAGING; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PARAMETRIC TEST; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; VALIDATION PROCESS; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; KINETICS;

ANIMALIA;

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; KINETICS; MICE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 77956668328     PISSN: 15361632     EISSN: 18602002     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-009-0273-5     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Acton PD, Zhuang H, Alavi A (2004) Quantification in PET. Radiol Clin North Am 42(6):1055-1062, viii
2. 18F] fluorodeoxyglucose. Methods 27(3):218-225
3. 18F-FDG PET studies. J Nucl Med 49(4):606-614
4. Laforest R, Sharp TL, Engelbach JA et al (2005) Measurement of input functions in rodents: challenges and solutions. Nucl Med Biol 32(7): 679-685
5. Gambhir SS, Schwaiger M, Huang SC et al (1989) Simple noninvasive quantification method for measuring myocardial glucose utilization in humans employing positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 deoxyglucose. J Nucl Med 30(3):359-366
6. Hoekstra CJ, Hoekstra OS, Lammertsma AA (1999) On the use of image-derived input functions in oncological fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography studies. Eur J Nucl Med 26(11):1489-1492
7. Ohtake T, Kosaka N, Watanabe T et al (1991) Noninvasive method to obtain input function for measuring tissue glucose utilization of thoracic and abdominal organs. J Nucl Med 32(7):1432-1438
8. Buvat I, Benali H, Frouin F, Bazin JP, Di Paola R (1993) Target apex-seeking in factor analysis of medical image sequences. Phys Med Biol 38(1):123-138
9. Di Paola R, Bazin JP, Aubry F et al (1982) Handling of dynamic sequences in nuclear medicine. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci NS-29:1310-1321
10. Sitek A, Gullberg GT, Huesman RH (2002) Correction for ambiguous solutions in factor analysis using a penalized least squares objective. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21(3):216-225
11. Su Y, Welch MJ, Shoghi KI (2007) The application of maximum likelihood factor analysis (MLFA) with uniqueness constraints on dynamic cardiac microPET data. Phys Med Biol 52(8):2313-2334
12. Su Y, Welch MJ, Shoghi KI (2007) Single input multiple output (SIMO) optimization for input function estimation: a simulation study. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2007. NSS '07. IEEE 6:4481-4484
13. Feng D, Wong KP, Wu CM, Siu WC (1997) A technique for extracting physiological parameters and the required input function simultaneously from PET image measurements: theory and simulation study. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 1(4):243-254
14. Wong KP, Feng D, Meikle SR, Fulham MJ (2001) Simultaneous estimation of physiological parameters and the input function-in vivo PET data. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 5(1):67-76
15. Feng D, Huang SC, Wang X (1993) Models for computer simulation studies of input functions for tracer kinetic modeling with positron emission tomography. Int J Biomed Comput 32(2):95-110
16. 18FFDG input function in mice by use of dynamic small-animal PET and minimal blood sample data. J Nucl Med
17. Meyer C, Weibrecht M, Peligrad DN (2006) Variation of kinetic model parameters due to input peak distortions and noise in simulated 82Rb PET perfusion studies. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2006. IEEE 5:2703-2707
18. Wong K-P, Huang S-C, Fulham MJ (2006) Evaluation of an input function model that incorporates the injection schedule in FDG-PET studies. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2006. IEEE 4:2086-2090
19. Shoghi KI, Welch MJ (2007) Hybrid image and blood sampling input function for quantification of small animal dynamic PET data. Nucl Med Biol 34(8):989-994
20. Phelps ME (2004) PET : molecular imaging and its biological applications. Springer, New York, 621 p
21. Segars WP, Tsui BM, Frey EC, Johnson GA, Berr SS (2004) Development of a 4-D digital mouse phantom for molecular imaging research. Mol Imaging Biol 6(3):149-159
22. El Fakhri G, Sitek A, Zimmerman RE, Ouyang J (2006) Generalized five-dimensional dynamic and spectral factor analysis. Med Phys 33 (4):1016-1024
23. Su Y, Shoghi KI (2008) Wavelet denoising in voxel based parametric estimation of small animal PET images: a systematic evaluation of spatial constraints and noise reduction algorithms Phys Med Biol 53(21):5899-5915
24. University of California Los Angeles Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology UCLA Mouse Quantitation Project. (http://dragon.nuc.ucla.edu). Accessed March 2008
25. Huang SC, Wu HM, Truong D et al (2006) A public domain dynamic mouse FDG MicroPET image data set for evaluation and validation of input function derivation methods. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2006. IEEE 5:2681-2683
26. Robb RA, Hanson DP, Karwoski RA et al (1989) Analyze: a comprehensive, operator-interactive software package for multidimensional medical image display and analysis. Comput Med Imaging Graph 13(6):433-454