Estimation of the 18F-FDG input function in mice by use of dynamic small-animal PET and minimal blood sample data

Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Volumn 48, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 2037-2045

  Ferl, Gregory Z ^a   Zhang, Xiaoli ^a   Wu, Hsiao Ming ^a   Huang, Sung Cheng ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

18F FDG; Mathematical model; Mouse; PET; Pharmacokinetics

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BLOOD SAMPLING; FEMORAL ARTERY; GOLD STANDARD; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PHOSPHORYLATION; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANIMAL; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLOOD; C57BL MOUSE; METHODOLOGY;

ANIMALS; AREA UNDER CURVE; BAYES THEOREM; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 36849081804     PISSN: 01615505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.041061     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Phelps ME, Hoffman EJ, Mullani NA, Ter-Pogossian MM. Application of annihilation coincidence detection to transaxial reconstruction tomography. J Nucl Med. 1975;16:210-224.
2. Bertoldo A, Sparacino G, Cobelli C. "Population" approach improves parameter estimation of kinetic models from dynamic PET data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004;23:297-306.
3. Loening AM, Gambhir SS. AMIDE: a free software tool for multimodality medical image analysis. Mol Imaging. 2003;2:131-137.
4. Laforest R, Sharp TL, Engelbach JA, et al. Measurement of input functions in rodents: challenges and solutions. Nucl Med Biol. 2005;32:679-685.
5. Kim J, Herrero P, Sharp T, et al. Minimally invasive method of determining blood input function from PET images in rodents. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:330-336.
6. Wu HM, Huang SC, Allada V, et al. Derivation of input function from FDG-PET studies in small hearts. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:1717-1722.
7. Huang SC, Phelps ME, Hoffman EJ, Sideris K, Selin CJ, Kuhl DE. Noninvasive determination of local cerebral metabolic rate of glucose in man. Am J Physiol. 1980;238:E69-E82.
8. Callegari T, Caumo A, Cobelli C. Generalization of map estimation in SAAM II: validation against ADAPT II in a glucose model case study. Ann Biomed Eng. 2002;30:961-968.
9. van den Hoff J, Burchert W, Muller-Schauenburg W, Meyer GJ, Hundeshagen H. Accurate local blood flow measurements with dynamic PET: fast determination of input function delay and dispersion by multilinear minimization. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1770-1777.
10. Huang SC, Wu HM, Kreissl M, et al. Evaluation of partial volume effects in mouse cardiac microPET images using a 4-D digital mouse phantom [abstract]. Mol Imaging Biol. 2005;7:134-135.
11. Kreissl MC, Wu HM, Stout DB, et al. Noninvasive measurement of cardiovascular function in mice with high-temporal-resolution small-animal PET. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:974-980.
12. Wu HM, Kreissl M, Ladno W, Prins M, Chatziioannou A, Huang SC. First-pass angiography in mice using FDG-PET: derivation of cardiac output without the need of region-of-interest drawing [abstract]. Mol Imaging Biol. 2005;7:162.
13. 18F]fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography images: the significance of partial volume correction [abstract]. Mol Imaging Biol. 2005;7:162.
14. 18F-FDG PET studies [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(suppl 2):204P.
15. Marino AT, Distefano JJ III, Landaw EM. DIMSUM: an expert system for multiexponential model discrimination. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:E546-E556.
16. PopKinetics 1.0.1, Version Windows [computer program]. Seattle, WA: SAAM Institute. Available at: http://depts.washington.edu/saam2/popKinetics/. Accessed October 16, 2007.
17. Brown RP, Delp MD, Lindstedt SL, Rhomberg LR, Beliles RP. Physiological parameter values for physiologically based pharmacokinetic models. Toxicol Ind Health. 1997;13:407-484.
18. Barrett PH, Bell BM, Cobelli C, et al. SAAM II: simulation, analysis, and modeling software for tracer and pharmacokinetic studies. Metabolism. 1998;47:484-492.
19. SAAM II User Guide. Seattle, WA: SAAM Institute; 2002.
20. Heatherington AC, Vicini P, Golde H. A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic comparison of SAAM II and PC/WinNonlin modeling software. J Pharm Sci. 1998;87:1255-1263.
21. Bell BM, Burke JV, Schumitzky A. A relative weighting method for estimating parameters and variances in multiple data sets. Comput Stat Data Anal. 1996;22:119-135.
22. Patlak CS, Blasberg RG, Fenstermacher JD. Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1983;3:1-7.
23. GraphPad Prism 4.03, Version Windows [computer program]. San Diego, CA: GraphPad Software. Available at: http://www.graphpad.com. Accessed October 16, 2007.
24. Huang SC, Truong D, Wu HM, et al. An Internet-based "kinetic imaging system" (KIS) for microPET. Mol Imaging Biol. 2005;7:330-341.
25. Huang SC, Wu HM, Troung D, et al. A public domain dynamic mouse FDG microPET image data set for evaluation and validation of input function derivation methods [abstract]. Conference Record of IEEE Medical Imaging Conference. 2006:2681-2683. IEEE catalog number 06CH37832C
26. UCLA Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology. UCLA Mouse Quantitation Project. Available at: http://dragon.nuc.ucla.edu. Accessed October 16, 2007.
27. 18F]FDG in skeletal muscle by PET: a four-compartment five-rate-constant model. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001;281:E524-E536.