Need for Cognition and the process of lie detection

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 961-971

  Reinhard, Marc André ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Credibility attribution; Detection of deception; Lay judgment; Lie detection; Need for cognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956612022     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Aamodt M.G., Custer H. Who can best catch a liar? A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. Forensic Examiner 2006, 15:6-11.
2. Aiken L.S., West S.G. Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions 1991, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
3. Akehurst L., Koehnken G., Vrij A., Bull R. Lay persons' and police officers' beliefs regarding deceptive behavior. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1996, 10:461-471. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199612)10:6<461::AID-ACP413>3.0.CO;2-2.
4. Apple W., Streeter L.A., Krauss R.M. Effects of pitch and speech rate on personal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979, 37:715-727. 10.1037/0022-3514.37.5.715.
5. Bless H., Wänke M., Bohner G., Fellhauer R.F., Schwarz N. Need for cognition: a scale measuring engagement and happiness in cognitive tasks. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 1994, 25:147-154.
6. Boehm L.E. The validity effect: a search for mediating variables. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1994, 20(3):285-293. 10.1177/0146167294203006.
7. Bond C.F., DePaulo B.M. Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2006, 10:214-234. 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2.
8. Bond C.F., DePaulo B.M. Individual differences in judging deception. Psychological Bulletin 2008, 134:501-503. 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.501.
9. Bond C.F., Kahler K.N., Paolicelli L.M. The miscommunication of deception: an adaptive perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1985, 21:331-345. 10.1016/0022-1031(85)90034-4.
10. Brewer M.B. A dual process model of impression formation. Advances in social cognition 1988, Vol. 1:1-36. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
11. Brewer M.B., Harasty Feinstein A. Dual processes in the cognitive representation of persons and social categories. Dual-process theories in social psychology 1999, 255-270. Guilford Press, New York, NY. S. Chaiken, Y. Trope (Eds.).
12. Buller D.B., Burgoon J.K. Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory 1996, 6:203-242. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00127.x.
13. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E. The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1982, 42:116-131. 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116.
14. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E., Feinstein J.A., Jarvis W.B.G. Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: the life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin 1996, 119:197-253. 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197.
15. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E., Morris K.J. Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983, 45:805-818. 10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.805.
16. Chaiken S., Liberman A., Eagly A.H. Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. Unintended thought: Limits of awareness, intention, and control 1989, 212-252. Guilford Press, New York. J.S. Uleman, J.A. Bargh (Eds.).
17. Chaiken S., Maheswaran D. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 66:460-473.
18. Dual-process theories in social psychology 1999, Guilford Press, New York. S. Chaiken, Y. Trope (Eds.).
19. Chen S., Chaiken S. The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. Dual-process theories in social psychology 1999, 73-96. Guilford Press, New York. S. Chaiken, Y. Trope (Eds.).
20. Cohen J., Cohen P., West S.G., Aiken L.S. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for behavioral sciences 2003, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, N. J.
21. DePaulo B.M., Lindsay J.J., Malone B.E., Muhlenbruck L., Charlton K., Cooper H. Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin 2003, 129:74-118. 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74.
22. DePaulo B.M., Rosenthal R. Telling lies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979, 37:1713-1722. 10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1713.
23. DePaulo B.M., Rosenthal R., Rieder Green C., Rosenkrantz J. Diagnosing deceptive and mixed messages from verbal and nonverbal cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1982, 18:433-446. 10.1016/0022-1031(82)90064-6.
24. Ekman P. Telling lies: clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage 1992, Norton, New York.
25. Ekman P., Friesen W.V. Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry 1969, 32:88-106.
26. Ekman P., O'Sullivan M. Who can catch a liar?. The American Psychologist 1991, 46:913-920. 10.1037/0003-066X.46.9.913.
27. Fiske S.T., Lin M., Neuberg S.L. The continuum model: ten years later. Dual-process theories in social psychology 1999, 231-254. Guilford Press, New York, NY. S. Chaiken, Y. Trope (Eds.).
28. Fiske S.T., Neuberg S.L. A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1990, Vol. 23:1-74. Academic Press, New York.
29. Forrest J.A., Feldman R.S. Detecting deception and judge's involvement: lower task involvement leads to better lie detection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2000, 26:118-125. 10.1177/0146167200261011.
30. Frank M.G., Ekman P. The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high-stake lies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997, 72(6):1429-1439. 10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1429.
31. Frank M.G., Ekman P. Appearing truthful generalizes across different deception situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2004, 86:486-495. 10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.486.
32. Freedman J.L., Adam E.K., Davey S.A., Koegl C.J. The impact of a statement: more detail does not always help. Legal and Criminological Psychology 1996, 1:117-130.
33. Hocking J.E., Leathers D.G. Nonverbal indicators of deception: a new theoretical perspective. Communication Monographs 1980, 47:119-131. 10.1080/03637758009376025.
34. Koehnken G. Glaubwürdigkeit [Credibility] 1990, Psychologie Verlags Union, München.
35. Kraut R.E. Verbal and nonverbal cues in the perception of lying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1978, 36:380-391. 10.1037/0022-3514.36.4.380.
36. Lassiter G.D., Briggs M.A., Bowman R.E. Need for cognition and the perception of ongoing behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1991, 17:156-160. 10.1177/0146167291176013.
37. Maheswaran D., Chaiken S. Promoting systematic processing in low motivation settings: the effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1991, 61:13-25.
38. Maheswaran D., Mackie D.M., Chaiken S. Brand name as a heuristic cue: the effects of task importance and expectancy confirmation on consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology 1992, 1:317-336. 10.1016/S1057-7408(08)80058-7.
39. Miller G.R., Stiff J.B. Deceptive Communication 1993, Sage, Newbury Park, California.
40. Paas F., Tuovinen J.E., Tabbers H., van Gerven P.W.M. Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist 2003, 38:63-71. 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8.
41. Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T. Attitudes and persuasion: classic and contemporary approaches 1981, Wm. C. Brown, Dubuque, IA.
42. Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T. The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1984, 46:69-81. 10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.69.
43. Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1986, 19:123-193. 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2.
44. Petty R.E., Wegener D.T. The elaboration likelihood model: current status and controversies. Dual-process theories in social psychology 1999, 41-72. Guilford Press, New York. S. Chaiken, Y. Trope (Eds.).
45. Priester J., Petty R.E. Source attribution and persuasion: perceived honesty as a determinant of message scrutiny. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1995, 21:637-654. 10.1177/0146167295216010.
46. Reinhard M.-A., Burghardt K., Sporer S.L., Bursch S.E. Alltagsvorstellungen über inhaltliche Kennzeichen von Lügen: Selbstberichtete Begründungen bei konkreten Glaubwürdigkeitsurteilen [Laypersons' beliefs regarding content-related cues of deception]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 2002, 33:169-180. 10.1024//0044-3514.33.3.169.
47. Reinhard M.-A., Sporer S.L. Beyond words: credibility attribution on the basis of nonverbal and verbal information as a function of judgment relevance. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 2005, 36:21-32. 10.1024/0044-3514.36.1.21.
48. Reinhard M.-A., Sporer S.L. Verbal and nonverbal behaviour as a basis for credibility attribution: the impact of task involvement and cognitive capacity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2008, 44:477-488. 10.1016/j.jesp. 2007.07.012.
49. Reinhard M.-A., Sporer S.L. Content versus source cue information as a basis for credibility judgments: the impact of task involvement. Social Psychology 2010, 41:93-104.
50. Riggio R., Friedman H.S. Individual differences and cues to deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983, 45:899-915. 10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.899.
51. Rosenthal R. Parametric measures of effect size. The Handbook of Research Synthesis 1994, 231-244. Russell Sage Foundation, New York. H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges (Eds.).
52. Sobel M.E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. Sociological methodology 1982 1982, 290-312. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. S. Leinhart (Ed.).
53. Sporer S.L. Reality monitoring and detection of deception. The detection of deception in forensic contexts 2004, 64-101. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, US. P.-A. Granhag, L. Stroemwall (Eds.).
54. Sporer S.L., Schwandt B. Paraverbal indicators of deception: a meta-analytic synthesis. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2006, 20(4):421-446. 10.1002/acp. 1190.
55. Sporer S.L., Schwandt B. Moderators of nonverbal indicators of deception. A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2007, 13(1):1-34. 10.1037/1076-8971.13.1.1.
56. Sporer S.L., Walther A. Truth detection by content cues: General vs. specific questions. Paper presented at the Meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society in Petersburg, FL 2006, March.
57. Stiff J.B., Miller G.R. "Come to think of it ..." Interrogative probes, deceptive communication, and deception detection. Human Communication Research 1986, 12:339-357. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00081.x.
58. Stiff J.B., Miller G.R., Sleight C., Mongeau P., Garlick R., Rogan R. Explanations for visual cue primacy in judgments of honesty and deceit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989, 56:555-564. 10.1037/0022-3514.56.4.555.
59. Streeter L.A., Krauss R.M., Geller V., Olson C., Apple W. Pitch changes during attempted deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1977, 35:345-350. 10.1037/0022-3514.35.5.345.
60. Stroemwall L.A., Granhag P.A. How to detect deception? Arresting the beliefs of police officers, prosecutors and judges. Psychology, Crime and Law 2003, 9:19-36. 10.1080/1068316021000057659.
61. The Global Deception Research Team A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2006, 37:60-74. 10.1177/0022022105282295.
62. Vrij A. Detecting lies and deceit. The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice 2000, John Wiley, Chichester.
63. Zuckerman M., Driver R.E. Telling lies: verbal and nonverbal correlates of deception. Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior 1985, 129-147. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N. J. A.W. Siegman, S. Feldstein (Eds.).
64. Zuckerman M., Koester R., Driver R.E. Beliefs about cues associated with deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 1981, 6:105-114.