Beyond words: Credibility attribution on the basis of nonverbal and verbal information as a function of judgment relevance;Mehr als Worte Glaubwürdigkeitsattribution anhand nonverbaler und inhaltlicher Informationen als Funktion der Urteilsrelevanz

Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 21-32

  Reinhard, Marc André ^a   Sporer, Siegfried Ludwig ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

^b JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Content cues; Credibility attribution; Elaboration likelihood model; Lay judgment; Lie detection; Nonverbal cues; Social judgment

Indexed keywords

EID: 17044407043     PISSN: 00443514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/0044-3514.36.1.21     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Akehurst, L., Köhnken, G., Vrij, A. & Bull, R. (1996). Lay persons' and police officers' beliefs regarding deceptive behavior. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 461-471.
2. Brewer, M.B. (1988). Adual process model of impression formation. In T. Srull & R. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
4. Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M.P. Zanna, J.M. Olson & C.P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Chaiken, S. & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460-473.
6. Chen, S. & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73-96). New York: Guilford.
7. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
8. DePaulo, B.M., Lindsay, J.J., Malone, B.E., Muhlen bruck, L., Charlton, K. & Cooper, H. (2003).Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118.
9. DePaulo, B.M., Stone, J.I. & Lassiter, G.D. (1985). Deceiving and detecting deceit. In B.R. Schlenker (Ed.), The self and social life (pp. 323-371). New York: Mc-Graw-Hill Book Company.
10. Eagly, A.H. & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
11. Eagly, A.H., Wood, W. & Chaiken, S. (1978). Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 424-435.
12. Ekman, P. & O'Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46, 913-920.
13. Fazio, R.H. & Towles-Schwen, T. (1999). The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 97-116). New York: Guilford.
14. Fiske, S.T. & Neuberg, S.L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York: Academic Press.
15. Forrest, J.A. & Feldman, R.S. (2000). Detecting deception and judge's involvement: Lower task involvement leads to better lie detection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 118-125.
16. Freedman, J.L., Adam, E.K., Davey, S.A. & Koegl, C.J. (1996). The impact of a statement: More detail does not always help. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 1, 117-130.
17. Knapp, M.L. & Comadena, M.E. (1979). Telling it like it isn't: A review of theory and research on deceptive communications. Human Communication Research, 5, 270-285.
18. Hocking, J.E. & Leather, D.G. (1980). Nonverbal indicators of deception: A new theoretical perspective. Communication Monographs, 47, 119-131.
19. Hovland, C.I. & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635-650.
20. Knapp, M.L. & Comadena, M.E. (1979). Telling it like it isn't: A review of theory and research on deceptive communications. Human Communication Research, 5, 270-285.
21. Köhnken, G. (1990). Glaubwürdigkeit. München: Psychologie Verlags Union.
22. Kraut, R.E. (1980). Humans as lie detectors: Some second thoughts. Journal of Communication, 30, 209-216.
23. Kruglanski, A.W., Thompson, E.P. & Spiegel, S. (1999). Separate or equal?: Bimodal notions of persuasion and a single-process 〈unimodel〉. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 293-313). New York: Guilford.
24. McGuire, W.J. (1969). The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol.3, pp. 136-314). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
25. Miller, G.R. & Burgoon, J.K. (1982). Factors affecting assessments of witness credibility. In N.L. Kerr & R.M. Bray, (Eds.), The psychology of the courtroom (pp. 169-194). New York: Academic Press.
26. Mills, J. (1966). Opinion change as a function of the communicator's desire to influence and liking for the audience. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 152-159.
27. Mills, J. & Aronson, E. (1965). Opinion change as a function of the communicator's attractiveness and desire to influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 173-177.
28. Mullen, B. (1989). Advanced BASIC meta-analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Petty, R.E. & Cacioppo, J.T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
30. Petty, R.E. & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986a). Communication and persuasion. Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer.
31. Petty, R.E. & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986b). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-193. (357)
32. Petty, R.E. & Wegener, D.T. (1999). The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 41-72). New York: Guilford.
33. Reinhard, M.A., Burghardt, K., Sporer, S.L. & Bursch, S.E. (2002). Alltagsvorstellungen über inhaltliche Kennzeichen von Lügen: Selbstberichtete Begründungen bei konkreten Glaubwürdigkeitsurteilen. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 33, 169-180.
34. Reinhard, M.A. & Sporer, S.L. (1999, Juni). Lügst Du? Die Wirkung der Motivation auf den Prozess der Glaubwürdigkeitsbeurteilung. Vortrag, gehalten auf der 7. Tagung der Fachgruppe Sozialpsychologie, Kassel.
35. Reinhard, M.A., Sporer, S.L. & Bohner, G. (2002, September). Beeinflusst Need for Cognition den Prozess der Glaubwürdigkeitsbeurteilung? Poster, präsentiert auf dem 43. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie, Berlin.
36. Rosenthal, R. & Rosnow, R.L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Stiff, J.B., Miller, G. R, Sleight, C., Mongeau, P. Garlick, R. & Rogan, R. (1989). Explanations for visual cue primacy in judgments of honesty and deceit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 555-564.
38. Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit. The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice. Chichester: Wiley, Ltd.
39. Walster, E., Aronson, E. & Abrahams, D. (1966). On increasing the persuasiveness of a low prestige communicator. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 325-343.
40. Winer, B.J., Brown, D.R. & Michels, K.M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill, Inc.
41. Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B.M. & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1-59). New York: Academic Press.
42. Zuckerman, M. & Driver, R.E., (1985). Telling lies: Verbal and nonverbal correlates of deception. In A.W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 129-147). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Zuckerman, M., Koester, R. & Driver, R.E. (1981). Believes about cues associated with deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 6, 105-114.