Navigated liver biopsy using a novel soft tissue navigation system versus CT-guided liver biopsy in a porcine model. A prospective randomized trial

Academic Radiology

Volumn 17, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1282-1287

  Müller, Sascha A ^a   Maier Hein, Lena ^b   Tekbas, Aysun ^a   Seitel, Alexander ^b   Ramsauer, Stefanie ^a   Radeleff, Boris ^a   Franz, Alfred M ^b   Tetzlaff, Ralf ^b   Mehrabi, Arianeb ^a   Wolf, Ivo ^b   Kauczor, Hans Ulrich ^b   Meinzer, Hans Peter ^b   Schmied, Bruno M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

CT guidance; Image guided therapy; Liver biopsy; Liver simulator; Navigated biopsy

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BREATHING MECHANICS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; LIVER BIOPSY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SWINE; TUMOR BIOPSY;

ANIMALS; BIOPSY; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIVER NEOPLASMS; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; SWINE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77956491317     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.05.017     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Nolte L.P., Slomczykowski M.A., Berlemann U., et al. A new approach to computer-aided spine surgery: fluoroscopy-based surgical navigation. Eur Spine 2000, 9:78-88.
2. Schiemann M., Killmann R., Kleen M., et al. Vascular guide wire navigation with a magnetic guidance system: Experimental results in a phantom. Radiology 2004, 232:475-481.
3. Biasca N., Schneider T.O., Bungartz M. Minimally invasive computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2009, 40:537-563.
4. Clifford M.A., Banovac F., Levy E., et al. Assessment of hepatic motion secondary to respiration for computer assisted interventions. Comput Aided Surg 2002, 7:291-299.
5. Khan M.F., Dogan S., Maataoui A., et al. Navigation-based needle puncture of a cadaver using a hybrid tracking navigational system. Invest Radiol 2006, 41:713-720.
6. Banovac F., Tang J., Xu S., et al. Precision targeting of liver lesions using a novel electromagnetic navigation device in physiologic phantom and swine. Med Phys 2005, 32:2698-2705.
7. Maier-Hein L., Pianka F., Seitel A., et al. Precision targeting of liver lesions with a needle-based soft tissue navigation system. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2007, 10:42-49.
8. Fichtinger G., Deguet A., Fischer G., et al. Image overlay for CT-guided needle insertions. Comput Aided Surg 2005, 10:241-255.
9. Zhang H., Banovac F., Lin R., et al. Electromagnetic tracking for abdominal interventions in computer aided surgery. Comput Aided Surg 2006, 11:127-136.
10. Krücker J., Xu S., Glossop N., et al. Electromagnetic tracking for thermal ablation and biopsy guidance: clinical evaluation of spatial accuracy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2007, 18:1141-1150.
11. Maier-Hein L., Tekbas A., Seitel A., et al. In vivo accuracy assessment of a needle-based navigation system for CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of the liver. Med Phys 2008, 35:5385-5396.
12. Maier-Hein L., Müller S.A., Pianka F., et al. Respiratory motion compensation for CT-guided interventions in the liver. Comput Aided Surg 2008, 13:125-138.
13. Müller S.A., Maier-Hein L., Mehrabi A., et al. Creation and establishment of a respiratory liver motion simulator for liver interventions. Med Phys 2007, 34:4605-4608.
14. Maier-Hein L., Tekbas A., Franz A.M., et al. On combining internal and external fiducials for liver motion compensation. Comput Aided Surg 2008, 13:369-376.
15. Welch T.J., Sheedy P.F., Johnson C.D., et al. CT-guided biopsy: prospective analysis of 1,000 procedures. Radiology 1989, 171:493-496.
16. Copel L., Sosna J., Kruskal J.B., et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy: indications, risks, and technique. Surg Technol Int 2003, 11:154-160.
17. Wallace M.J., Gupta S., Hicks M.E. Out-of-plane computed-tomography-guided biopsy using a magnetic-field-based navigation system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2006, 29:108-113.
18. Yu S.C., Liew C.T., Lau W.Y., et al. US-guided percutaneous biopsy of small (< or = 1-cm) hepatic lesions. Radiology 2001, 218:195-199.
19. Middleton W.D., Hiskes S.K., Teefey S.A., et al. Small (1.5 cm or less) liver metastases: US-guided biopsy. Radiology 1997, 205:729-732.
20. Golling M., Kellner H., Fonouni H., et al. Reduced glutathione in the liver as a potential viability marker in non-heart-beating donors. Liver Transpl 2008, 14:1637-1647.
21. Müller-Stich B.P., Mehrabi A., Kenngott H.G., et al. Improved reflux monitoring in the acute gastroesophageal reflux porcine model using esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance measurement. J Gastrointest Surg 2008, 12:1351-1358.
22. Court F.G., Wemyss-Holden S.A., Morrison C.P., et al. Segmental nature of the porcine liver and its potential as a model for experimental partial hepatectomy. Br J Surg 2003, 90:440-444.
23. Seitel A., Maier-Hein L., Schawo S., et al. In-vitro evaluation of different visualization approaches for computer assisted targeting in soft tissue. Int J CARS 2007, 2(Suppl 1):188-190.
24. Tekbas A, Maier-Hein L, Müller SA, et al. Technical implementation of a new computer assisted navigation system for percutaneous liver biopsy-pitfalls and potential benefits. (in preparation).
25. Wood B.J., Zhang H., Durrani A., et al. Navigation with electromagnetic tracking for interventional radiology procedures: a feasibility study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005, 16:493-505.
26. Markert M., Koschany A., Lueth T. Tracking of the liver for navigation in open surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2010, 5:229-235.
27. Maier-Hein L., Maleike D., Neuhaus J., et al. Soft tissue navigation using needle-shaped markers: evaluation of navigation aid tracking accuracy and CT registration. Proc SPIE Med Imaging 2007, 6509:650926.
28. Silverman S.G., Deuson T.E., Kane N., et al. Percutaneous abdominal biopsy: cost-identification analysis. Radiology 1998, 206:429-435.
29. McGill D.B., Rakela J., Zinsmeister A.R., et al. A 21-year experience with major hemorrhage after percutaneous liver biopsy. Gastroenterology 1990, 99:1396-1400.
30. Janes C.H., Lindor K.D. Outcome of patients hospitalized for complications after outpatient liver biopsy. Ann Intern Med 1993, 118:96-98.
31. Stattaus J., Kuehl H., Ladd S., et al. CT-guided biopsy of small liver lesions: visibility, artifacts, and corresponding diagnostic accuracy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007, 30:928-935.
32. Haage P., Piroth W., Staatz G., et al. CT-guided percutaneous biopsies for the classification of focal liver lesions: a comparison between 14 G and 18 G puncture biopsy needles. Rofo 1999, 171:44-48.
33. Stattaus J., Kühl H., Hauth E.A., et al. Liver biopsy under guidance of multislice computed tomography: comparison of 16G and 18G biopsy needles. Radiologe 2007, 47:430-438.
34. Piccinino F., Sagnelli E., Pasquale G., et al. Complications following percutaneous liver biopsy. A multicenter retrospective study on 68,276 biopsies. J Hepatol 1986, 2:165-173.
35. Cadranel J.F., Rufat P., Degos F. Group of Epidemiology of the French Association for the Study of the Liver (AFEF). Practices of liver biopsy in France: results of a prospective nationwide study. Hepatology 2000, 32:477-481.