Liver biopsy under guidance of multislice computed tomography: Comparison of 16G and 18G biopsy needles;Leberbiopsie mit hilfe der mehrschichtcomputertomographie: Vergleich zwischen 16-G- und 18-G-biopsienadeln

Radiologe

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 430-438

  Stattaus, J ^a   Kuhl H ^a   Hauth, E A ^a   Kalkmann, J ^a   Baba, H A ^a   Forsting, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Liver biopsy; MSCT; Needle size

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FATALITY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LIVER BIOPSY; LIVER DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEEDLE; NEEDLE BIOPSY; OPERATION DURATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIVER; LIVER DISEASES; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34250180942     PISSN: 0033832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00117-005-1336-5     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Brown RW, Campagna LB, Dunn JK, Cagle PT (1997) Immunohistochemical identification of tumor markers in metastatic adenocarcinoma. A diagnostic adjunct in the determination of primary site. Am J Clin Pathol 107:12-19
2. Feuerbach S, Gmeinwieser J, Gerhardt P, Gossner W, Rotter M, Gossmann A (1989) CT-gesteuerte Biopsie - Methoden, Resultate und Komplikationen. Rofo 151:4-9
3. Feuerbach S, Schreyer A, Schlottmann K (2003) Standards radiologisch bildgesteuerter Biopsien - Indikationsstellung, Technik, Komplikationen. Radiologie up2date 3:207-224
4. Francque SM, De Pauw FF, Van den Steen GH, Van Marck EA, Pelckmans PA, Michielsen PP (2003) Biopsy of focal liver lesions: guidelines, comparison of techniques and cost-analysis. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 66:160-165
5. Gazelle GS, Haaga JR, Rowland DY (1992) Effect of needle gauge, level of anticoagulation, and target organ on bleeding associated with aspiration biopsy. Work in progress. Radiology 183:509-513
6. Gianfelice D, Lepanto L, Perreault P, Chartrand-Lefebvre C, Milette PC (2000) Value of CT fluoroscopy for percutaneous biopsy procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11:879-884
7. Glaser J, Pausch J (1995) Zur Frage des Risikos von Leberbiopsien. Z Gastroenterol 33:673-676
8. Haage P, Piroth W, Staatz G, Adam G, Gunther RW (1999) CT-gesteuerte perkutane Biopsien zur Klassifizierung von fokalen Leberläsionen: Vergleich zwischen 14G- und 18G-Stanzbiopsienadeln. Rofo 171:44-48
9. Kalender WA (1999) Grundlagen und Technik der Spiral-CT. Radiologe 39:809-819
10. Kettenbach J, Blum M, El-Rabadi K, Langenberger H, Happel B, Berger J, Ba-Ssalamah A (2005) Perkutane Leberbiopsie: Übersicht über verschiedene Verfahren. Radiologe 45:44-54
11. Knöpfle E, Bohndorf K, Wagner T (1997) Erlaubt die Stanzbiopsie solider Leberherde eine exakte histologische Klassifizierung? Ergebnisse einer prospektiven Untersuchung unter klinischen Routinebedingungen. Rofo 167:406-411
12. Martino CR, Haaga JR, Bryan PJ, LiPuma JP, El Yousef SJ, Alfidi RJ (1984) CT-guided liver biopsies: eight years' experience. Work in progress. Radiology 152:755-757
13. McGill DB, Rakela J, Zinsmeister AR, Ott BJ (1990) A 21-year experience with major hemorrhage after percutaneous liver biopsy. Gastroenterology 99:1396-1400
14. Moulton JS, Moore PT (1993) Coaxial percutaneous biopsy technique with automated biopsy devices: value in improving accuracy and negative predictive value. Radiology 186:515-522
15. Pagani JJ (1983) Biopsy of focal hepatic lesions. Comparison of 18 and 22 gauge needles. Radiology 147:673-675
16. Silverman SG, Tuncali K, Adams DF, Nawfel RD, Zou KH, Judy PF (1999) CT fluoroscopy-guided abdominal interventions: techniques, results, and radiation exposure. Radiology 212:673-681
17. Wutke R, Schmid A, Fellner F, Horbach T, Kastl S, Papadopoulos T, Hohenberger W, Bautz W (2001) CT-gesteuerte perkutane Schneidbiopsie: effektive Genauigkeit, diagnostischer Nutzen und effektive Kosten. Rofo 173:1025-1033