Navigation-based needle puncture of a cadaver using a hybrid tracking navigational system

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 41, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 713-720

  Khan, M Fawad ^a   Dogan, Selami ^a   Maataoui, Adel ^a   Wesarg, Stefan ^b   Gurung, Jessen ^a   Ackermann, Hanns ^a   Schiemann, Mirko ^a   Wimmer Greinecker, Gerhard ^a   Vogl, Thomas J ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b FRAUNHOFER IGD   (Germany)

Author keywords

Augmented reality system; CT overlay; Electromagnetic tracking; Interventional radiology; Optical tracking

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISPLAY SYSTEM; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; HEAD POSITION; HUMAN; IMAGING; IMAGING SYSTEM; INSTRUMENT; NEEDLE; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUNCTURE; RADIOLOGIST; SKIN INCISION; SOFT TISSUE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; THORAX;

EID: 33748740893     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000236910.75905.cc     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Chang S, Kim SH, Lim HK, et al. Needle tract implantation after sonographically guided percutaneous biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation of doubling time, frequency, and features on CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:400-405.
2. Osseiran K, Muller KM, Apel C, et al. CT-guided transthoracic aspiration of peripheral pulmonary nodules with a special bioptic needle [German]. Pneumologie. 2005;59:369-375.
3. Veltman J, Boetes C, Wobbes T, et al. Magnetic resonance-guided biopsies and localizations of the breast: initial experiences using an open breast coil and compatible intervention device. Invest Radiol. 2005;40:379-384.
4. Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J. 2000;9:235-240; discussion 241.
5. Tang J, Cleary K. Breakdown of tracking accuracy for electromagnetically guided abdominal interventions. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, et al., eds. Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. Proc. of the 17th CARS; 2003:452-459.
6. Schwarz Y, Mehta AC, Ernst A, et al. Electromagnetic navigation during flexible bronchoscopy. Respiration. 2003;70:516-522.
7. Foley KT, Smith MM. Image-guided spine surgery. Neurosurg Clin North Am. 1996;7:171-186.
8. Rampersaud YR, Foley KT, Shen AC, et al. Radiation exposure to the spine surgeon during fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw insertion. Spine. 2000;25:2637-2645.
9. Bucholz SM, Levy A. Image guidance and the operating microscope: stealth and neural navigation. In: Alexander E III, Maciunas RJ, eds. Advanced Neurosurgical Navigation. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc; 1999.
10. Holzknecht N, Helmberger T, Schoepf UJ, et al. Evaluation of an electromagnetic virtual target system (CT-guide) for CT-guided interventions [German]. Rofo. 2001;173:612-618.
11. Tirakotai W, Riegel T, Sure U, et al. Clinical application of neuronavigation in a series of single burr-hole procedures. Zentralbl Neurochir. 2004;65:57-64.
12. Foley KT, Simon DA, Rampersaud YR. Virtual fluoroscopy: computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation. Spine. 2001;26:347-351.
13. Kato A, Yoshimine T, Hayakawa T, et al. A frameless, armless navigational system for computer-assisted neurosurgery. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 1991;74:845-849.
14. Bolger C, Wigfield C. Image-guided surgery: applications to the cervical and thoracic spine and a review of the first 120 procedures. J Neurosurg Spine. 2000;92:175-180.
15. Kamimura M, Ebara S, Itoh H, et al. Accurate pedicle screw insertion under the control of a computer-assisted image guiding system: laboratory test and clinical study. J Orthop Sci. 1999;4:197-206.
16. Smith KR, Frank KJ, Bucholz RD. The NeuroStation - a highly accurate, minimally invasive solution to frameless stereotactic neurosurgery. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1994;18:247-256.
17. Tirakotai W, Sure U, Benes L, et al. Image-guided transsylvian, transinsular approach for insular cavernous angiomas. Neurosurgery. 2003;53:1299-1304; discussion 1304-1305.
18. Sindwani R, Metson R. Impact of image guidance on complications during osteoplastic frontal sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;131:150-155.
19. Sandeman DR, Gill SS. The impact of interactive image guided surgery: the Bristol experience with the ISG/Elekta viewing Wand. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1995;64:54-58.
20. Kotani Y, Abumi K, Ito M, et al. Improved accuracy of computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2003;99:257-263.
21. Medarpa. Available at: http://www.medarpa.de. 2003.
22. Nowinski WL, Yeo TT, Thirunavuukarasuu A. Microelectrode-guided functional neurosurgery assisted by Electronic Clinical Brain Atlas CD-ROM. Comput Aided Surg. 1998;3:115-122.
23. Fichtinger G, Deguet A, Fischer G, et al. Image overlay for CT-guided needle insertions. Comput Aided Surg. 2005;10:241-255.
24. Fichtinger G, Deguet A, Masamune K, et al. Image overlay guidance for needle insertion in CT scanner. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005;52:1415-1424.
25. Fischer GS, Deguet A, Schlattman D, et al. MRI image overlay: applications to arthrography needle insertion. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;119:150-155.
26. Khan MF, Dogan S, Maataoui A, et al. Accuracy of biopsy needle navigation using the Medarpa system-computed tomography reality superimposed on the site of intervention. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:2366-2374.
27. Schwald BF, Miguel P. Learning of rigid point-based marker models for tracking with stereo camera systems. In: Brunnett G, ed. Virtuelle und Erweiterte Realität 2004;1. Workshop der GIFachgruppe VR/AR. Aachen: Shaker; 2004:23-34.
28. Wesarg S, Lauer TH, Firle EA, et al. Several marker segmentation techniques for use with a medical AR system - a comparison. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, et al., eds. Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. Proc. of the 17th CARS; 2003:1303.
29. Schwald BMC. Controlling virtual worlds using interaction spheres. In Vidal CA, ed. 5th Symposium on Virtual Reality (SVR). Fortaleza, Brazil: Brazilian Computer Society; 2002.
30. Schwald BS, Helmut. Registration tasks for a hybrid tracking system for medical augmented reality. In: Skala, Vaclav, eds. European Association for Computer Graphics (Eurographics): Journal of WSCG, vol 12, no 3. Proceedings. Plzen: University of West Bohemia; 2004:411-418.
31. Gumprecht HK, Widenka DC, Lumenta CB. BrainLab VectorVision Neuronavigation System: technology and clinical experiences in 131 cases. Neurosurgery. 1999;44:97-104; discussion 104-105.
32. Laine T, Schlenzka D, Makitalo K, et al. Improved accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with computer-assisted surgery. A prospective clinical trial of 30 patients. Spine. 1997;22:1254-1258.
33. Merloz P, Tonetti J, Pittet L, et al. Computer-assisted spine surgery. Comput Aided Surg. 1998;3:297-305.
34. Hummel J, Figl M, Kollmann C, et al. Evaluation of a miniature electromagnetic position tracker. Med Phys. 2002;29:2205-2212.
35. Birkfellner W, Watzinger F, Wanschitz F, et al. Systematic distortions in magnetic position digitizers. Med Phys. 1998;25:2242-2248.
36. Barnett GH, Steiner CP, Weisenberger J. Adaptation of personal projection television to a head-mounted display for intra-operative viewing of neuroimaging. J Image Guid Surg. 1995;1:109-112.
37. Germano IM, Queenan JV. Clinical experience with intracranial brain needle biopsy using frameless surgical navigation. Comput Aided Surg. 1998;3:33-39.
38. Bolger C, Wigfield C, Melkent T, et al. Frameless stereotaxy and anterior cervical surgery. Comput Aided Surg. 1999;4:322-327.
39. Golfinos JG, Fitzpatrick BC, Smith LR, et al. Clinical use of a frameless stereotactic arm: results of 325 cases. J Neurosurg. 1995;83:197-205.
40. Deurloo EE, Gilhuijs KG, Schultze Kool LJ, et al. Displacement of breast tissue and needle deviations during stereotactic procedures. Invest Radiol. 2001;36:347-353.
41. Helbich TH, Matzek W, Fuchsjager MH. Stereotactic and ultrasound-guided breast biopsy. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:383-393.
42. Bale RJ, Lottersberger C, Vogele M, et al. A novel vacuum device for extremity immobilisation during digital angiography: preliminary clinical experiences. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:2890-2894.
43. Tokuda J, Morikawa S, Dohi T, et al. Motion tracking in MR-guided liver therapy by using navigator echoes and projection profile matching. Acad Radiol. 2004;11:111-120.
44. Kettenbach J, Kronreif G, Figl M, et al. Robot-assisted biopsy using computed tomography-guidance: initial results from in vitro tests. Invest Radiol. 2005;40:219-228.
45. Diebold T, Hahn T, Solbach C, et al. Evaluation of the stereotactic 8G vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in the histologic evaluation of suspicious mammography findings (BI-RADS IV). Invest Radiol. 2005;40:465-471.