University students' explanations for their descriptions of people who stutter: An exploratory mixed model study

Journal of Fluency Disorders

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 280-298

  Hughes, Stephanie ^a   Gabel, Rodney ^b   Irani, Farzan ^c   Schlagheck, Adam ^b  

^a GOVERNORS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitude measurement; Mixed methods research; Stereotyping; Stuttering

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OPEN ENDED QUESTIONNAIRE; PERCEPTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STEREOTYPY; STUDENT ATTITUDE; STUTTERING; UNIVERSITY STUDENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEX FACTORS; STUDENTS; STUTTERING; UNIVERSITIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77956474931     PISSN: 0094730X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2010.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Atkins C.P. Perceptions of speakers with minimal eye contact: implications for stutterers. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1988, 13. 439-436.
2. Baron H. Strengths and limitations of ipsative measurement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 1996, 69:49-56.
3. Basit T.N. Manual or electronic: The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Educational Research 2003, 45:143-154.
4. Bogdan R., Biklen R.C. Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods 1992, Allyn-Bacon, Boston.
5. Brewer J., Hunter A. Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles 1989, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
6. Burley P.M., Rinaldi W. Effects of sex of listener and of stutterer on ratings of stuttering speakers. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1986, 17:329-333.
7. Collins C.R., Blood G.W. Acknowledgment and severity of stuttering as factors influencing nonstutterers' perceptions of stutterers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1990, 55:75-81.
8. Creswell J.W. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions 1998, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
9. Creswell J.W., Plano Clark V.L., Gutmann M.L., Hanson W.E. Advanced mixed methods research designs. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research 2003, 209-240. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie (Eds.).
10. Crowe T.A., Cooper E.B. Parental attitudes toward and knowledge of stuttering. Journal of Communication Disorders 1977, 10:343-357.
11. Crowe T.A., Walton J.H. Teacher attitudes toward stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1981, 6:163-174.
12. Cuddy A.J.C., Fiske S.T., Glick P. Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 2008, 40:61-150.
13. Dillman D.A. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method 2007, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
14. Doody I., Kalinowski J., Armson J., Stuart A. Stereotypes of stutterers and nonstutterers in three rural communities in Newfoundland. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1993, 18:363-373.
15. Dorsey M., Guenther R.K. Attitudes of professors and students toward college students who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2000, 25:77-83.
16. Fowlie G.M., Cooper E.B. Traits attributed to stuttering and nonstuttering children by their mothers. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1978, 3:233-246.
17. Gabel R.M. Effects of stuttering severity and therapy involvement on attitudes towards people who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2006, 31:216-227.
18. Gabel R.M., Blood G.W., Tellis G.M., Althouse M.T. Measuring role entrapment of people who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2004, 29:27-49.
19. Glesne C. Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction 2005, Longman, New York. 3rd ed.
20. Ham R.E. What is stuttering: Variations and stereotypes. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1990, 15:259-273.
21. Hartford E., Leahy M.M. The perceptions of primary school children of a person who stutters. Proceedings of the 5th world congress on fluency disorders 2007, 223-229. The International Fluency Association, Dublin, Ireland. J. Au-Yeung, M.M. Leahy (Eds.).
22. Healey E.C., Gabel R.M., Daniels D.E., Kawai N. The effects of self-disclosure and non self-disclosure of stuttering on listeners' perceptions of a person who stutters. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2007, 32:51-69.
23. Hulit L.M., Wirtz L. The association of attitudes toward stuttering with selected variables. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1994, 19:247-267.
24. Johnson R.B., Onwuegbuzie A.J. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher 2004, 33:14-26.
25. Kalinowski J., Armson J., Stuart A., Lerman J.W. Speech clinicians' and the general public's perceptions of self and stutterers. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology 1993, 17:79-85.
26. Klassen T.R. Perceptions of people who stutter: Re-assessing the negative stereotype. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2001, 92:551-559.
27. Klassen T.R. Social distance and the negative stereotype of people who stutter. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology 2002, 26:90-99.
28. Langevin M., Hagler P. Development of a scale to measure peer attitudes toward children who stutter. Evidence-based treatment of stuttering: Empirical bases and clinical applications 2004, 139-177. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. A.K. Bothe (Ed.).
29. Lass N.J., Ruscello D.M., Pannbacker M., Schmitt J.F., Everly-Myers D.S. Speech-language pathologists' perceptions of child and adult female and male stutterers. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1989, 14:127-134.
30. Lass N.J., Ruscello D.M., Pannbacker M., Schmitt J.F., Kiser A.M., Mussa A.M., et al. School administrators' perceptions of people who stutter. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1994, 25:90-93.
31. Lass N.J., Ruscello D.M., Schmitt J.F., Pannbacker M.D., Orlando M.B., Dean K.A., et al. Teachers' perceptions of stutterers. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1992, 23:78-81.
32. Manning W.H., Burlison A.E., Thaxton D. Listener response to stuttering modification techniques. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1999, 24:267-280.
33. Meyers L.S., Gamst G., Guarino A.J. Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation 2006, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
34. Miles M., Huberman M. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook 1994, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 2nd ed.
35. Morse J.M. Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research 2003, 189-208. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie (Eds.).
36. Oakes P.J., Haslam S., Alexander, Morrison B., Grace D. Becoming an in-group: Reexamining the impact of familiarity on perceptions of group homogeneity. Social Psychology Quarterly 1995, 58:52-61.
37. Osgood C.E., Suci G.J., Tannenbaum P.H. The measurement of meaning 1957, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
38. Panico J., Healey E.C., Brouwer K., Susca M. Listener perceptions of stuttering across two presentation modes: A quantitative and qualitative approach. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2005, 30:65-85.
39. Patterson J., Pring T. Listener attitudes to stuttering speakers: No evidence for a gender difference. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1991, 16:201-205.
40. Ruscello D.M., Lass N.J., Schmitt J.F., Pannbacker M.D. Special educators' perceptions of stutterers. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1994, 19:125-132.
41. Schneider D.J. The psychology of stereotyping 2005, Guilford Press, New York.
42. Smart J. Disability, society, and the individual 2001, Pro-Ed, Austin, TX.
43. Smith E.R., Miller D.A., Maitner A.T., Crump S.A., Garcia-Marques T., Mackie D. Familiarity can increase stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2006, 42:471-478.
44. Snyder G.J. Exploratory research in the measurement and modification of attitudes toward stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2001, 26:149-160.
45. Susca M., Healey E.C. Listener perceptions along a fluency-disfluency continuum: A phenomenological analysis. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2002, 27:135-161.
46. Swartz E., Gabel R., Hughes S., Irani F. Speech-language pathologists' responses on surveys on vocational stereotyping (role entrapment) regarding people who stutter. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders 2009, 36:157-165.
47. Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. The past and the future of mixed model research: From "methodological triangulation" to "mixed model designs" Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research 2003, 671-701. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie (Eds.).
48. Tatchell R.H., van den Berg S., Lerman J.W. Fluency and eye contact as factors influencing observers' perceptions of stutterers. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1983, 8:221-231.
49. Teddlie C., Tashakkori A. Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research 2003, 3-50. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie (Eds.).
50. Turnbaugh K., Guitar B., Hoffman P. Speech clinicians' attribution of personality traits as a function of stuttering severity. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1979, 22:37-45.
51. Weisel A., Spektor G. A possible explanation of the "stutterer" stereotype. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1998, 23:157-172.
52. White P.A., Collins S.R.C. Stereotype formation by inference: A possible explanation for the "stutterer" stereotype. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1984, 27:567-570.
53. Woods C.L., Williams D.E. Speech clinicians' conceptions of boys and men who stutter. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1971, 36:225-234.
54. Woods C.L., Williams D.E. Traits attributed to stuttering and normally fluent males. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1976, 19:267-278.
55. Yairi E., Williams D.E. Speech clinicians' stereotypes of elementary-school boys who stutter. Journal of Communication Disorders 1970, 3:161-170.
56. Yaruss J.S., Quesal R.W. Stuttering and the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF): An update. Journal of Communication Disorders 2004, 37:35-52.