Strengths and limitations of ipsative measurement

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 49-56

  Baron, Helen ^a  

^a Saville and Holdsworth Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030500679     PISSN: 09631798     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00599.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bartram, D. (1996). The relationship between ipsatized and normative measures of personality. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 25-39.
2. Borkowski, T. (1989). Validation Review. Thames Ditton, UK: Saville & Holdsworth Ltd.
3. Borkowski, T. (1995). Validation Review 2. Thames Ditton, UK: Saville & Holdsworth Ltd.
4. Clemans, W. V. (1966). An analytical and empirical examination of some properties of ipsative measures. Psychometric Monographs, 14.
5. Closs, S. J. (1996). On the factoring and interpretation of ipsative data. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 41-47.
6. Cornwell, J. M. & Dunlap, W. P. (1994). On the questionable soundness of factoring ipsative data: A response to Saville & Willson (1991). Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 89-100.
7. Gibbons, P. J., Baron, H., Nyfield, G. & Robertson, I. R. (1995). Hypothesis testing in personality questionnaire validation research. Paper presented at the 4th European Congress of Psychology, Athens.
8. Gordon, L. V. (1976). Survey of Interpersonal Values: Revised Manual. Chicago, IL: Science Research Associates.
9. Hicks, L. E. (1970). Some properties of ipsative, normative, and forced-choice normative measures. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 167-184.
10. Johnson, C. E., Wood, R. & Blinkhorn, S. F. (1988). Spuriouser and spuriouser: The use of ipsative personality tests. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 153-162.
11. Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12. Munro, A. (1995). Put your hands together one more time for the 'ipsative debate': A response to Closs. Selection & Development Review, 11(5) 1-2.
13. Nunnally, J. C. (1967), Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C. & Korbin, W. P. (1995). Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: Between subjects versus within subjects designs. Paper presented at the 10th annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organisational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
15. Saville, P., Nyfield, G., Sik, G. & Hackston, J. (1991). Enhancing the person-iob match through personality assessment. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.
16. Saville, P. & Willson, E. (1991). The reliability and validity of normative and ipsative approaches in the measurement of personality. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 219-238.
17. Saville & Holdsworth Ltd (1993a). OPQ Concept Model Manual and Users' Guide. Thames Ditton, UK: Saville & Holdsworth Ltd.
18. Saville & Holdsworth Ltd (1993b). OPQ Factor Model Manual and Users' Guide. Thames Ditton, UK: Saville & Holdsworth Ltd.
19. Tenopyr, M. L. (1988). Artificial reliability of forced-choice scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 749-751.
20. Wigfield, D. & Janman, K. (1991). Seeing ourselves as others see us. Guidance and Assessment Review, 7(5), 3-5.