Does lght prime dark? Masked associative priming with addition neighbors

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 513-518

  Perea, Manuel ^a   Gomez, Pablo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS;

DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS;

EID: 77956466254     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.4.513     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. BAAYEN, R. H., PIEPENBROCK, R., & GULIKERS, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
2. BODNER, G. E., & MASSON, M. E. J. (2003). Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 645-652.
3. BOURASSA, D. C., & BESNER, D. (1998). When do nonwords activate semantics? Implications for models in visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 26, 61-74.
4. BOWERS, J. S., DAVIS, C. J., & HANLEY, D. A. (2005). Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a "hat" in "that"? Journal of Memory & Language, 52, 131-143.
5. CARAMAZZA, A., CHIALANT, D., CAPASSO, D., & MICELI, G. (2000). Separable processing of consonants and vowels. Nature, 403, 428-430.
6. CARREIRAS, M., GILLON-DOWENS, M., VERGARA, M., & PEREA, M. (2009). Are vowels and consonants processed differently? Eventrelated potential evidence with a delayed letter paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 275-288.
7. COLTHEART, M., RASTLE, K., PERRY, C., ZIEGLER, J., & LANGDON, R. (2001). DRC: A dual-route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
8. DAVIS, C. J. (1999). The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Macquarie University. Available at www.maccs.mq.edu.au/~colin.
9. DAVIS, C. J. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 65-70.
10. DAVIS, C. J. (2006). Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioral data and current models. In S. Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 180-206). New York: Psychology Press.
11. DAVIS, C. J., PEREA, M., & ACHA, J. (2009). Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: The role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 1550-1570.
12. DAVIS, C. J., & TAFT, M. (2005). More words in the neighborhood: Interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 904-910.
13. DE MOOR, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2000). Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets have different lengths. Psychological Research, 63, 159-162.
14. DUÑABEITIA, J. A., CARREIRAS, M., & PEREA, M. (2008). Are coffee and toffee served in a cup? Ortho-phonologically mediated associative priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1861-1872.
15. DUYCK, W. (2005). Translation and associative priming with cross-lingual pseudohomophones: Evidence for nonselective phonological activation in bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1340-1359.
16. FORSTER, K. I., & DAVIS, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 680-698.
17. FORSTER, K. I., DAVIS, C., SCHOKNECHT, C., & CARTER, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 211-251.
18. FORSTER, K. I., & FORSTER, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124.
19. GOLD, B., & RASTLE, K. (2007). Neural correlates of morphological decomposition during visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1983-1993.
20. GOMEZ, P., RATCLIFF, R., & PEREA, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577-601.
21. GRAINGER, J. (2008). Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language & Cognitive Processes, 23, 1-35.
22. GRAINGER, J., GRANIER, J.-P., FARIOLI, F., VAN ASSCHE, E., & VAN HEUVEN, W. J. E. (2006). Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 865-884.
23. GRAINGER, J., & JACOBS, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
24. GRAINGER, J., & VAN HEUVEN, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon (pp. 1-23). New York: Nova Science.
25. GROSSI, G. (2006). Relatedness proportion effects on masked associative priming: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 43, 21-30.
26. JACOBS, A. M., REY, A., ZIEGLER, J. C., & GRAINGER, J. (1998). MROM-p: An interactive activation, multiple readout model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 147-188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. LUPKER, S. J., PEREA, M., & DAVIS, C. J. (2008). Transposed letter priming effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency. Language & Cognitive Processes, 23, 93-116.
28. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & RUMELHART, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
29. MEHLER, J., PEÑA, M., NESPOR, M., & BONATTI, L. L. (2006). The "soul" of language does not use statistics: Reflections on vowels and consonants. Cortex, 42, 846-854.
30. NELSON, D. L., MCEVOY, C. L., & SCHREIBER, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Available at www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
31. NEW, B., ARAÚJO, V., & NAZZI, T. (2008). Differential processing of consonants and vowels in lexical access through reading. Psychological Science, 19, 1223-1227.
32. PEREA, M., & ACHA, J. (2009). Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique. Acta Psychologica, 130, 127-137.
33. PEREA, M., DUÑABEITIA, J. A., & CARREIRAS, M. (2008). R34D1NG W0RD5 W1TH NUMB3R5. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34, 237-241.
34. PEREA, M., & GOTOR, A. (1997). Associative and semantic priming effects occur at very short SOAs in lexical decision and naming. Cognition, 62, 223-240.
35. PEREA, M., & LUPKER, S. J. (2003). Does jugde activate court? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31, 829-841.
36. PEREA, M., & LUPKER, S. J. (2004). Can caniso activate casino? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory & Language, 51, 231-246.
37. PEREA, M., & ROSA, E. (2000). Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a short stimulus onset asynchrony. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 668-677.
38. PEREA, M., & ROSA, E. (2002). The effects of associative and semantic priming in the lexical decision task. Psychological Research, 66, 180-194.
39. PERESSOTTI, F., & GRAINGER, J. (1999). The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 691-706.
40. PERRY, C., ZIEGLER, J. C., & ZORZI, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273-315.
41. SCHOONBAERT, S., & GRAINGER, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language & Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367.
42. SEGUI, J., & GRAINGER, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 65-76.
43. SERENO, S. C., & RAYNER, K. (1992). Fast priming during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 173-184.
44. WHITNEY, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221-243.