Fatgraph models of proteins

Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics

Volumn 63, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1249-1297

  Penner, R C ^a,b   Knudsen, Michael ^b   Wiuf, Carsten ^b   Andersen, Jørgen Ellegaard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956460775     PISSN: 00103640     EISSN: 00103640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cpa.20340     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alberts, B.; Johnson, A.; Lewis, J.; Raff, M.; Roberts, K.; Walters, P. The shape and structure of proteins. Molecular biology of the cell, 4th ed. Garland Science, New York-London, 2002. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?highlight=structure,shape,proteins&rid=mboc4.section.388
2. Bairoch, A. Serendipity in bioinformatics, the tribulations of a Swiss bioinformatician through exciting times! Bioinformatics 16 (2000), no. 1, 48-64. Available at: http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/16/1/48.
3. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The protein data bank. Nucl. Acids Res. 28 (2000), no. 1, 235-242. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10592235.
4. Bessis D.; Itzykson, C.; Zuber, J. B. Quantum field theory techniques in graphical enumeration. Adv. in Appl. Math. 1 (1980), no. 2, 109-157.
5. Boomsma, W.; Mardia, K. V.; Taylor, C. C.; Ferkinghoff-Borg, J.; Krogh, A.; Hamelryck, T. A generative, probabilistic model of local protein structure. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 (2008), no. 26, 8932-8937.
6. Bourbaki, N. Elements of mathematics: Lie groups and Lie algebras. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1975.
7. Breiman, L. Random forests. Machine Learning 45 (2001), 5-32.
8. Brézin, E.; Kazakov, V.; Serban, D.; Wiegmann, P.; Zabrodin, A., eds. Applications of random matrices in physics. Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute held in Les Houches, June 6-25, 2004. NATO Science Series II: Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry, 221. Springer, Dordrecht, 2006.
9. Darling, R.W. R. Differential forms and connections. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
10. Finkelstein, A. V.; Ptitsyn, O. B. Protein physics: a course of lectures (soft condensed matter, complex fluids and biomaterials). Academic, London-San Diego, 2002.
11. Finkelstein, A. V. Private communication, 2008.
12. Finn, R. D.; Tate, J.; Mistry, J.; Coggill, P. C.; Sammut, J. S.; Hotz, H. R.; Ceric, G.; Forslund, K.; Eddy, S. R.; Sonnhammer, E. L.; Bateman, A. The Pfam protein families database. Nucl. Acids Res. 36 (2008), D281-D288. Available at: http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/36/suppl_1/D281?maxtoshow=&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=the+pfam+protein+families&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&resourcetype=HWCIT
13. Gusfield, D. Algorithms on strings, trees, and sequences. Computer science and computational biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.
14. Harer, J. L.; Zagier, D. The Euler characteristic of the moduli space of curves. Invent. Math. 85 (1986), no. 3, 457-485.
15. Holm, L.; Kääriäinen, S.; Rosenström, P.; Schenkel, A. Searching protein structure databases with DaliLite v.3. Bioinformatics 24 (2008), no. 23, 2780-2781.
16. Igusa, K. Combinatorial Miller-Morita-Mumford classes and Witten cycles. Algebr. Geom. Topol. 4 (2004), 473-520.
17. Kabsch, W.; Sander, C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 12 (1983), no. 12, 2577-637.
18. Kontsevich, M. Intersection theory on the moduli space of curves and the matrix Airy function. Comm. Math. Phys. 147 (1992), no. 1, 1-23.
19. Kortemme, T.; Morozov, A. V.; Baker, D. An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 326 (2003), no. 4, 1239-1259.
20. Lindauer, K.; Bendic, C.; Sühnel, J. HBexplore-a new tool for identifying hydrogen bonding patterns in biological macromolecules. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12 (1996), no. 4, 281-289.
21. Massey, W. S. Algebraic topology: an introduction. Reprint of the 1967 ed. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 56. Springer, New York-Heidelberg 1977.
22. g,n are tautological. Int. Math. Res. Not. (2004), no. 44, 2329-2390.
23. Murzin, A. G.; Brenner, S. E.; Hubbard, T.; Chothia, C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247 (1995), no. 4, 536-540.
24. Ohtsuki, T. Quantum invariants. A study of knots, 3-manifolds, and their sets. Series on Knots and Everything, 29. World Scientific, River Edge, N.J., 2001.
25. Orengo, C. A.; Michie, A. D.; Jones, D. T.; Swindells, M. B.; Thornton, J. M. CATH-a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 5 (1997), no. 8, 1093-1108.
26. Penner, R. C. Perturbative series and the moduli space of Riemann surfaces. J. Differential Geom. 27 (1988), no. 1, 35-53.
27. Penner, R. C.; Waterman, M. S. Spaces of RNA secondary structures. Adv. Math. 101 (1993), no. 1, 31-49.
28. Røgen, P.; Fain, B. Automatic classification of protein structure by using Gauss integrals. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (2003), no. 1, 119-124.
29. Strebel, K. Quadratic differentials. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3), 5. Springer, Berlin, 1984.
30. 't Hooft, G. A planar diagram theory for strong interactions. Nucl. Phys. B 72 (1974), 461-473.
31. Wu, C. H.; Apweiler, R.; Bairoch, A.; Natale, D. A.; Barker, W. C.; Boeckmann, B.; Ferro, S.; Gasteiger, E.; Huang, H.; Lopez, R.; Magrane, M.; Martin, M. J.; Mazumder, R.; O'Donovan, C.; Redaschi, N.; Suzek, B. The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt): an expanding universe of protein information. Nucl. Acids Res. 34 (2006), D187-D191.