Performance under ambiguity: International organization performance in UN peacekeeping

Review of International Organizations

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 249-284

  Lipson, Michael ^a  

^a Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

Author keywords

Ambiguity; International organizations; Organization theory; Peacekeeping; Performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956454630     PISSN: 15597431     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11558-010-9090-5     Document Type: Article

References (138)

1. Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2010). International regulation without international government: Improving IO performance through orchestration. Review of International Organizations, 5(3).
2. Ahmed, S. (2005). No size fits all: lessons in making peace and rebuilding states. Foreign Affairs, 84(1), 162-169.
3. Balint, T., Schernbeck, S., & Schneider, S. (2009). Performance accountability in the UN Secretariat-the conflictual way toward more flexibility. Public Administration and Development, 29(5), 352-361.
4. Barnett, M. (1995). The New United Nations politics of peace: from juridical sovereignty to empirical sovereignty. Global Governance, 1(1), 79-97.
5. Barnett, M. (2002). Eyewitness to a genocide: The United Nations in Rwanda. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
6. Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
7. Barnett, M., Kim, H., O'Donnell, M., & Sitea, L. (2007). Peacebuilding: what's in a name? Global Governance, 13(1), 35-58.
8. Benner, T., & Rotmann, P. (2008). Learning to learn? UN peacebuilding and the challenges of building a learning organization. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 2(1), 43-62.
9. Best, J. (2005). The Limits of transparency: Ambiguity and the history of international finance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
10. Biermann, R. (2008). Towards a theory of inter-organizational networking: the Euro-Atlantic security institutions interacting. Review of International Organizations, 3(2), 151-177.
11. Boschken, H. L. (1994). Organizational performance and multiple constituencies. Public Administration Review, 54(3), 308-312.
12. Bratt, D. (1997). Assessing the success of UN peacekeeping operations. In M. Pugh (Ed.), The UN, peace, and force (pp. 64-81). Portland: Frank Cass.
13. Brunsson, N. (1989). The organization of hypocrisy: Talk, decision and action in organizations. New York: Wiley.
14. Brusset, E. (2009). Significance of impact assessment: A new methodology. In S. Meharg (Ed.), Measuring what matters in peace operations and crisis management (pp. 189-201). Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
15. Call, C. T., & Cousens, E. M. (2008). Ending wars and building peace. International Studies Perspectives, 9(1), 1-21.
16. Campbell, S. P. (2008a). (Dis)integration, incoherence and complexity in UN post-conflict interventions. International Peacekeeping, 15(4), 556-569.
17. Campbell, S. P. (2008b). When process matters: the potential implications of organizational learning for peacebuilding success. Journal of Peacebuilding and Development, 4(2), 20-32.
18. Campbell, S. P., & Kasperson, A. (2008). The UN's reforms: Confronting integration barriers. International Peacekeeping, 15(4), 470-485.
19. Center on International Cooperation. (2009a). Building on Brahimi: Peacekeeping in an era of strategic uncertainty. Retrieved from http://www. cic. nyu. edu/Lead%20Page%20PDF/CIC%20New%20Horizons%20Report. pdf. Accessed October 16, 2009.
20. Center on International Cooperation. (2009b). Peacekeeping overstretch: Symptoms, causes, and consequences, background paper for the thematic series 'Building more effective UN peace operations.' Retrieved from http://www. cic. nyu. edu/peacebuilding/docs/More Effective UN PKO Thematic Series Background Paper. pdf. Accessed October 16, 2009.
21. Cohen, M., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1-25.
22. Cunliffe, P. (2009). The politics of global governance in UN peacekeeping. International Peacekeeping, 16(3), 323-336.
23. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. New York: Wiley.
24. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1992). A behavioral theory of the firm. Cambridge: Blackwell.
25. Dalrymple, S. (2009). Survey of the United Nations Organisation's arrangements for monitoring and evaluating support to security sector reform. London: Saferworld. Saferworld Research Report.
26. Diehl, P. F. (1994). International peacekeeping: With a new epilogue on Somalia, Bosnia, and Cambodia. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
27. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
28. Dobbie, C. (1994). A concept for post-Cold War peacekeeping. Survival, 36(3), 121-148.
29. Dobbins, J., Jones, S. G., Crane, K., Rathmell, A., Steele, B., Teltschik, R., et al. (2005). The UN's role in nation-building from the Congo to Iraq. Santa Monica: RAND.
30. Downs, G., & Stedman, S. J. (2002). Evaluation issues in peace implementation. In S. J. Stedman, D. Rothchild, & E. M. Cousens (Eds.), Ending civil wars: The implementation of peace agreements (pp. 43-69). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
31. Doyle, M. W., & Sambanis, N. (2000). International peacebuilding: a theoretical and quantitative analysis. American Political Science Review, 94(4), 778-801.
32. Doyle, M. W., & Sambanis, N. (2006). Making war and building peace: United Nations peace operations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
33. Duggan, C. (2004). UN strategic and operational coordination: Mechanisms for preventing and managing violent conflict. In A. Schnabel & D. Carment (Eds.), Conflict prevention: From rhetoric to reality, Vol. 1: Organizations and institutions (pp. 345-362). Lanham: Lexington.
34. Durch, W. J. (Ed.). (2006). Twenty-first-century peace operations. Washington: United States Institute of Peace.
35. Durch, W. J., & Berkman, T. C. (2006). Restoring and maintaining peace: What we know so far. In W. J. Durch (Ed.), Twenty-first-century peace pperations (pp. 1-48). Washington: United States Institute of Peace.
36. Durch, W. J., Holt, V. K., Earle, C. R., & Shanahan, M. K. (2003). The Brahimi report and the future of UN peace operations. Washington: The Henry L. Stimson Center.
37. Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York: Wiley.
38. Eide, E. B., Kaspersen, A. T., Kent, R., & von Hippel, K. (2005). Report on integrated missions: Practical perspectives and recommendations. Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA Core Group, May. Oslo: NUPI.
39. Elsig, M. (2010). The World Trade Organization at work: performance in a member-driven milieu. Review of International Organizations 5(3).
40. Fearon, J., & Laitin, D. (2003). Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review, 97(1), 75-90.
41. Fearon, J., & Laitin, D. (2004). Neotrusteeship and the problem of weak states. International Security, 28(4), 5-43.
42. Feldman, M. (1989). Order without design: Information production and policy making. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
43. Finnemore, M. (1996). Norms, culture, and world politics: Insights from sociology's new institutionalism. International Organization, 50(2), 325-347.
44. Fortna, V. P. (2004a). Does peacekeeping keep peace? International intervention and the duration of peace after civil war. International Studies Quarterly, 48(2), 269-292.
45. Fortna, V. P. (2004b). Interstate peacekeeping: causal mechanisms and empirical effects. World Politics, 56(4), 481-519.
46. Fortna, V. P. (2004c). Peace time: Cease-fire agreements and the durability of peace. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
47. Fortna, V. P. (2008). Does peacekeeping work? Shaping belligerents' choices after civil war. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
48. Fortna, V. P., & Howard, L. M. (2008). Pitfalls and prospects in the peacekeeping literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 283-301.
49. Fosdick, A. (1999a). Conflict management learning? Policy reflections and institutional reforms. Global Governance, 5(4), 425-455.
50. Fosdick, A. (1999b). Using Organization theory to understand international organizations: Four models of multilateral decision making. International Public Management Journal, 2(2[A]), 327-370.
51. Frumkin, P., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2004). Institutional isomorphism and public sector organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 283-307.
52. Fukuyama, F. (2004). State-building: Governance and world order in the 21st century. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
53. Gowan, R. (2008). The strategic context: peacekeeping in crisis, 2006-2008. International Peacekeeping, 15(4), 453-469.
54. Guéhenno, J.-M. (2005). Memorandum to all DPKO headquarters and mission staff: Peace Operations 2010. Retrieved from http://ukun. fco. gov. uk/resources/en/pdf/peacekeeping-2010. Accessed September 2, 2009.
55. Gutner, T. (2005). Explaining the gaps between mandate and performance: agency theory and World Bank environmental reform. Global Environmental Politics, 5(2), 10-37.
56. Gutner, T., & Thompson, A. (2010). The Politics of IO performance: a framework. Review of International Organizations 5 (3).
57. Howard, L. M. (2008). UN peacekeeping in civil wars. New York: Cambridge University Press.
58. Human Security Report Project. (2007). Human Security Brief 2007. Vancouver, BC: School of International Studies, Simon Fraser University. Retrieved from http://www. humansecuritybrief. info/HSRP_Brief_2007. pdf. Accessed October 15, 2009.
59. Jakobsen, P. V. (2000). The emerging consensus on grey area peace operations doctrine: will it last and enhance operational effectiveness? International Peacekeeping, 7(3), 36-56.
60. Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61. Kanter, R. M., & Brinkerhoff, D. (1981). Organizational performance: recent developments in measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 7, 321-349.
62. Kettl, D. (1997). The global revolution in public management: driving themes, missing links. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16(3), 446-462.
63. King, G., & Zheng, L. (2007). When can history be our guide? The pitfalls of counterfactual inference. International Studies Quarterly, 51(1), 183-210.
64. Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: Collins.
65. Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
66. Lipson, M. (2007a). A 'Garbage Can Model' of UN Peacekeeping. Global Governance 13(1), 79-97.
67. Lipson, M. (2007b). Peacekeeping: Organized Hypocrisy? European Journal of International Relations 13(1), 5-34.
68. Luck, E. C. (2009). Making the UN accountable: Political and managerial challenges. In S. Kuyama & M. R. Fowler (Eds.), Envisioning reform: Enhancing UN accountability in the 21st Century (pp. 19-34). New York: United Nations University Press.
69. Lynch, C. (2009). Russia vetoes resolution on U. N. peacekeepers in Georgia. The Washington Post, 15 June, Retrieved from http://www. washingtonpost. com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/15/AR2009061503047. html, Accessed October 15, 2009.
70. Mansfield, E., & Snyder, J. (2002). Democratic transitions, institutional strength, and war. International Organization, 56(2), 297-337.
71. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. (1976a). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.
72. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. (1976b). Organizational choice under ambiguity. In J. G. March & J. Olsen (Eds.), Ambiguity and choice in organizations (pp. 10-23). Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.
73. March, J. G., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Organizational performance as a dependent variable. Organization Science, 8(6), 698-706.
74. Mathiason, J. R. (2004). Who controls the machine, III: accountability in the results-based revolution. Public Administration and Development, 24(1), 61-73.
75. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. T. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-63.
76. Meyer, J. W., & Zucker, L. G. (1989). Permanently failing organizations. Newbury Park: Sage.
77. Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
78. Paris, R. (2003). Peacekeeping and the constraints of global culture. European Journal of International Relations, 9(3), 441-473.
79. Paris, R. (2004). At war's end: Building peace after civil conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.
80. Paris, R. (2009). Understanding the 'coordination problem' in postwar statebuilding. In R. Paris & T. D. Sisk (Eds.), The dilemmas of statebuilding: Confronting the contradictions of postwar peace operations (pp. 53-78). New York: Routledge.
81. Perrow, C. (1961). The analysis of goals in complex organizations. American Sociological Review, 26(6), 854-866.
82. Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations: A critical essay (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
83. Pollack, M. A., & Hafner-Burton, E. M. (2010). Mainstreaming international governance: the environment, gender, and IO performance in the European Union. Review of International Organizations 5(3).
84. Pouligny, B. (2006). Peace operations seen from below: UN missions and local people. Bloomfield: Kumarian.
85. Powell, T. C., Lovallo, D., & Caringal, C. (2006). Causal ambiguity, management perception, and firm performance. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 175-196.
86. Pushkina, D. (2006). A recipe for success? Ingredients of a successful peacekeeping mission. International Peacekeeping, 13(2), 133-149.
87. Quick, I. D. (2009). Aligning objectives: Integration of UN strategy in Haiti, Liberia, Sudan, and Timor-Leste: A policy analysis project for the UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, unpublished working paper. March: Harvard Kennedy School.
88. Radin, B. A. (2006). Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, complexity, and democratic values. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
89. Reed, R., & DiFillippi, R. J. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 88-102.
90. Salomons, D. (2003). Good intentions to naught: The pathology of human resource management at the United Nations. In D. Dijkzeul & Y. Beigbeder (Eds.), Rethinking international organizations: Pathology and promise (pp. 111-139). New York: Berghahn.
91. Sambanis, N., & Doyle, M. W. (2007). No easy choices: estimating the effects of United Nations peacekeeping (response to King and Zeng). International Studies Quarterly, 51(1), 217-226.
92. Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
93. Scott, W. R., & Davis, G. D. (2007). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural, and open systems perspectives. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
94. Seashore, S. E., & Yuchtman, E. (1967). Factorial analysis of organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(3), 377-395.
95. Seibel, W. (1996). Successful failure: an alternative view on organizational coping. American Behavioral Scientist, 39(8), 1011-1024.
96. Selden, S. C., & Sowa, J. E. (2004). Testing a multi-dimensional model of organizational performance: prospects and problems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 395-416.
97. Shimura, H. (2001). The role of the Secretariat in organizing peacekeeping. In R. Thakur & A. Schnabel (Eds.), United Nations peacekeeping operations: Ad hoc missions, permanent engagement (pp. 46-56). New York: United Nations University Press.
98. Shiroyama, H. (2009). UN management reform as a basis for managerial accountability. In S. Kuyama & M. R. Fowler (Eds.), Envisioning reform: Enhancing UN accountability in the twenty-first century (pp. 162-173). New York: United Nations University Press.
99. Simonin, B. L. (1995). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7), 599-624.
100. Stedman, S. J. (2007). UN transformation in an era of soft balancing. International Affairs, 83(5), 933-944.
101. Thompson, A. (2009). Channels of power: The UN Security Council and U. S. statecraft in Iraq. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
102. Underdal, A. (2002). One question, two answers. In E. L. Miles, A. Underdal, S. Andresen, J. Wettestad, J. B. Skjaerseth, & E. M. Carlin (Eds.), Environmental regime effectiveness: Confronting theory with evidence (pp. 3-45). Cambridge: MIT.
103. United Nations. (1992). An agenda for peace: Preventive diplomacy, peacemaking, and peacekeeping: Report of the Secretary-General pursuant to the statement adopted by the summit meeting of the Security Council on 31 January 1992. New York: United Nations. A/47/277-S/24111, 17 June.
104. United Nations. (1999). Results-based budgeting: Report of the Secretary-General. New York: United Nations. A/54/456, 11 October.
105. United Nations. (2000a). Regulations and rules governing programme planning, the programme aspects of the budget, the monitoring of implementation and the methods of evaluation: Secretary-General's bulletin. New York: United Nations. ST/SGB/2000/8, 19 April.
106. United Nations. (2000b). Report of the UN panel on peace operations, A/55/305-S/2000/809, 21 August. New York: United Nations. [Brahimi Report].
107. United Nations. (2000c). Results-based budgeting: Report of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions. New York: United Nations. A/55/543, 3 November.
108. United Nations. (2001). No exit without strategy: Security Council decision-making and the closure or transition of United Nations peacekeeping operations: Report of the Secretary General. New York: United Nations. S/2001/394, 20 April.
109. United Nations. (2005a). Budget for the support account for peacekeeping operations for the period from 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006: Report of the Secretary-General. New York: United Nations. A/59/730, 8 March.
110. United Nations. (2005b). Proposed programme budget for the biennium 2006-2007, Part II: Political affairs, Section 5: Peacekeeping operations. New York: United Nations. A/60/6 (Sect. 5), 2 May.
111. United Nations. (2006a). Evaluation of results-based budgeting in peacekeeping operations. Geneva: United Nations. JIU/REP/2006/1.
112. United Nations. (2006b). Integrated mission planning process (IMPP): Guidelines endorsed by the Secretary-General on 13 June 2006. New York: United Nations.
113. United Nations. (2006c). Note of guidance on integrated missions, 9 February. Retrieved from http://www. undg. org/docs/8483/8039-SG_s_Note_of_Guidance_on_Integrated_Missions__Feb__2006. pdf. Accessed August 10, 2008.
114. United Nations. (2007a). Peacekeeping best practices: Report of the Secretary General. New York: United Nations. A/62/593, 18 December.
115. United Nations. (2007b). Report of the Office of Internal Oversight Services on the audit of the management structures of the Department of Peacekeeping Operations. New York: United Nations. A/61/743, 14 February.
116. United Nations. (2007c) Review of results-based budgeting in United Nations Mission in Liberia (UNMIL), Office of Internal Oversight Services, Inspection and Evaluation Division, INS-07-002,.
117. United Nations. (2007d) Review of results-based budgeting in United Nations Mission in Sudan (UNMIS), Office of Internal Oversight Services, Inspection and Evaluation Division, INS-07-004, 21 December.
118. United Nations. (2008a). 2008 senior manager's compact between Mr. Jean-Marie Guéhenno, Under-Secretary-General for Peacekeeping Operations and the Secretary-General, Mr. Ban Ki-Moon. Retrieved from http://www. innercitypress. com/guehennocompact. pdf. Accessed February 4, 2009.
119. United Nations. (2008b). Accountability framework, enterprise risk management and internal control framework, and results-based management framework: Report of the Secretary-General. New York: United Nations. A/62/701, 19 February.
120. United Nations. (2008c). Performance report on the budget of the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo for the period From 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007: Report of the Secretary-General. New York: United Nations. A/62/737.
121. United Nations. (2008d). Preliminary report on the status of implementation of General Assembly Resolution 61/279 on strengthening the capacity of the United Nations to manage and sustain peacekeeping operations. New York: United Nations. A/62/741, 31 March.
122. United Nations. (2008e). Programme performance of the United Nations for the biennium 2006-2007: Report of the Secretary-General. New York: United Nations. A/63/70, 28 April.
123. United Nations. (2008f). Review of results-based management at the United Nations, A/63/268*, 22 September.
124. United Nations. (2008g). Secretary-General's Decision No. 2008/24-Integration, 26 June 2008. Retrieved from http://www. undg. org/docs/9898/Integration-decision-SG-25-jun-08. pdf. Accessed March 25, 2009.
125. United Nations. (2008h). United Nations peacekeeping operations: Principles and guidelines. New York: Peacekeeping Best Practices Section, UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations. [Capstone Doctrine].
126. United Nations. (2009a). Letter dated 23 February 2009 from the representatives of France and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council, S/2009/112, 24 February.
127. United Nations. (2009b). Report of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Operations and its working group-2009 substantive session (23 February-20 March 2009). New York: United Nations. A/63/19, 24 March.
128. United Nations. (2010a). Towards an accountability system in the United Nations Secretariat: Report of the Secretary-General, A/64/640, 29 January.
129. United Nations. (2010b). United Nations peacekeeping operations: Background note, DPI/1634/Rev. 108-May 2010, 30 April 2010. Retrieved from http://www. un. org/Depts/dpko/dpko/bnote010101. pdf. Accessed June 16, 2010.
130. United Nations. (2010c). Mission statement, Department of Peacekeeping Operations web page. Retrieved from http://www. un. org/depts/dpko/dpko/info/page3. htm. Accessed March 12, 2008.
131. United Nations Departments of Peacekeeping Operations and Field Support. (2009). A new partnership agenda: Creating a new horizon for UN peacekeeping. New York: United Nations.
132. United States General Accounting Office. (2003). UN peacekeeping: Transition strategies for post-conflict countries lack results-oriented measures of progress: Report to the chairman, Committee on International Relations, House of Representatives. Washington: U. S. General Accounting Office. GAO-03-1071, September.
133. United States General Accounting Office. (2004). United Nations: Reforms progressing, but comprehensive assessments needed to measure impact. Report to Congressional Requesters. Washington: U. S. General Accounting Office. GAO-04-339, February.
134. Weaver, C. E. (2008). The hypocrisy trap: The rhetoric, reality and reform of the world bank. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
135. Weaver, C. E. (2010) The politics of performance evaluation: independent evaluation at the International Monetary Fund. Review of International Organizations, 5(3).
136. Weick, K. E. (1979). Social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading: Addison-Wesley.
137. Weiss, T. G. (2008). What's wrong with the United Nations and how to fix it. Malden: Polity.
138. Zahariadis, N. (2003). Ambiguity and choice in public policy: Political decision making in modern democracies. Washington: Georgetown University Press.