A comparative study on a novel model-based PID tuning and control mechanism for nonlinear systems

International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control

Volumn 20, Issue 13, 2010, Pages 1483-1501

  Iplikci, S ^a  

^a PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Adaptive control; Neural networks; Pid auto tuning; Support vector machines

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE CONTROL; AUTOTUNING; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; CONTROL ACTIONS; CONTROL APPROACH; CONTROL MECHANISM; CONTROL PERFORMANCE; CONVERGENCE PERFORMANCE; CONVERGENCE PROPERTIES; MEASUREMENT NOISE; MODEL-BASED; NARX MODELS; PARAMETER CONVERGENCE; PID CONTROLLERS; PID TUNING; PREDICTIVE MODELS; PROPORTIONAL INTEGRAL DERIVATIVES; SIMULATION RESULT; STEADY STATE TRACKING; SUPPORT VECTOR;

MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL; NEURAL NETWORKS; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; PROPORTIONAL CONTROL SYSTEMS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; THREE TERM CONTROL SYSTEMS; TUNING; TWO TERM CONTROL SYSTEMS;

ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 77956370697     PISSN: 10498923     EISSN: 10991239     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.1524     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Astrom KJ, Hagglund T, Hang CC, Ho WK. Automatic tuning and adaptation for PID controllers-a survey. Control Engineering Practice 1993;1:699-714.
2. Astrom KJ, Hagglund T. PID Controllers: Theory, Design and Tuning. ISA Research Triangle Park: NC, 1995.
3. O'Dwyer A. Handbook of PI and PID Controller Tuning Rules. Imperial College Press: London, 2003.
4. Na MG. Auto-tuned PID controller using a modelpredictive control method for the steam generator water level. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 2001;48:1664-1671.
5. Xu M, Li S, Qi C., Cai W. Auto-tuning of PID controller parameters with supervised receding horizon optimization. ISA Transactions 2005;44:491-500.
6. Parlos AG, Parthasarathy S, Atiya AF. Neuro-predicitive process control using on-line controller adaptation. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 2001;9:741-755.
7. Chen J, Huang T. Applying neural networks to on-line updated PID controllers for nonlnear process control. Journal of Process Control 2004;14:211-230.
8. Zhang M, Li W, Liu M. Adaptive PID control strategy based on RBF neural network identification. Proceedings of the ICNNB International Conference on Neural Networks and Brain, Beijing, China, 13-15 October, 2005;1854-1857.
9. Wu C. Genetic tuning of PID controllers using a neural network model: a seesaw example. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 1999;25:43-59.
10. Vapnik VN. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer: London, 1995.
11. Vapnik VN. Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1998.
12. Cristianini N, Taylor JS. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods. Cambridge University Press: New York, 2000.
13. Scholkopf B, Burges CJC, Smola AJ. Advances in Kernel Methods: Support Vector Learning. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, U. S. A., 1999.
14. Iplikci S. Support vector machines-based generalized predictive control. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 2006;16(17):843-862.
15. Iplikci S. Online trained support vector machines-based generalized predictive control of non-linear systems. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 2006;20(10):599-621.
16. Liu H, Wu H, Qian F. Double inverted pendulum control based on support vector machines and fuzzy inference. Proceeding of Advances in Neural Networks-ISNN 2006 2006;3972:1124-1130.
17. Xi XC, Poo AN, Chou SK. Support vector regression model predictive control on a hvac plant. Control Engineering Practice 2007;15(8):897-908.
18. Wang H, Pi D, Sun Y. Online svm regression algorithm-based adaptive inverse control. Neurocomputing 2007;70%(4-6):952-959.
19. Liu H, Liu D. Self-tuning PID controller for a nonlinear system based on support vector machines. Kongzhi Lilun yu Yingyong/Control Theory and Applications 2008;25(3):468-474.
20. Wanfeng S, Shengdun Z, Yajing S. Adaptive PID controller based on online LSSVM identification. Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Xi'an, China, 2-5 July 2008;694-698.
21. Takao K, Yamamoto T, Hinamoto T. A design of PID controllers with a switching structure by a support vector machine. Proceedings of the IJCNN International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 16-21 July 2006;4684-4689.
22. Nocedal J, Wright SJ. Numerical Optimization. Springer: New York, 1999.
23. Venkataraman P. Applied Optimization with MATLAB Programming. Wiley-Interscience: New York, 2002.
24. Smola AJ, Scholkopf B. A tutorial on support vector regression. NeuroCOLT Technical Report NC-TR-98-030, Royal Holloway College, University of London, 1998.
25. Hagan MT, Demuth HB, Beale MH. Neural Network Design. PWS Publishing Company: Boston, 2002.
26. Soloway D, Haley PJ. Neural generalized predictive control: a Newton-Raphson algorithm. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, Dearborn, MI, U. S. A., 15-18 September 1996;277-282.
27. Sindelar R, Babuska R. Input selection for nonlinear regression models. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 2004;12(5):688-696.
28. Efe MO, Abadoglu E, Kaynak O. A novel analysis and design of a neural network assisted nonlinear controller for a bioreactor. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 1999;9(11):799-815.
29. Wu W, Chou YS. Adaptive feedforward and feedback control of nonlinear time-varying uncertain systems. International Journal of Control 1999;72(12):1127-1138.