Dialogue, conflict, and community

The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research, and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 517-548

  Barge, J Kevin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956368066     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781412976176.n19     Document Type: Chapter

References (129)

1. Abelson J. Forest P. Eyles J. Smith P. Martin E. Gauvin F.Deliberations about deliberative methods: Issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes Social Science and Medicine 57 (2003) 239-251
2. Abu-Nimer M.Conflict resolution approaches: Western and Middle Eastern lessons and possibilities American Journal of Economics and Sociology 55 (1996) 35-52doi:10.1111/j.1536-7150.1996.tb02706.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1996.tb02706.x-->
3. Alfasi N.Is public participation making urban planning more democratic? The Israeli experience Planning Theory and Practice 4 (2003) 185-202
4. Aprioku I. M.Local planning and public participation: The case of waterfront redevelopment in Port Harcourt, Nigeria Planning Perspectives 13 (1998) 69-88doi:10.1080/026654398364572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/026654398364572
5. Argyris, C.(1993). Knowledge for action: A guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Ashcraft K. L. Trethewey A.Developing tension: An agenda for applied research on the organization of irrationality Journal of Applied Communication Research 32 (2004) 171-181doi:10.1080/0090988042000178103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0090988042000178103
7. Baine D. Sawatzky D.Mediation methods as an adjunct to counseling couples International Journal for the Advancement of Counseling 14 (1991) 237-284
8. Bakhtin, M. M.(1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
9. Bakhtin, M. M.(1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (C.Emerson, Ed. & Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1929).
10. Bakhtin, M. M.(1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
11. Bakhtin, M. M.(1993). Toward a philosophy of the act. Austin: University of Texas Press.
12. Barber, B.(1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13. Barge J. K.Creating healthy communities through affirmative conflict communication Conflict Resolution Quarterly 19 (2001) 89-102doi:10.1002/crq.3890190107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/crq.3890190107
14. Barge J. K.Hope, communication, and community building Southern Communication Journal 69 (2003) 63-81doi:10.1080/10417940309373279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10417940309373279
15. Barge, J. K., Lee, M., Maddux, K., Nabring, R., & Townsend, B.(2004, November). Dialogical communication, tension, and organizational change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago.
16. Barge J. K. Little M.Dialogical wisdom, communicative practice, and organizational life Communication Theory 12 (2002) 365-397
17. Barge J. K. Oliver C.Working with appreciation in managerial practice Academy of Management Review 28 (2003) 124-142
18. Benhabib, S.(1992). Situating the self: Gender, community, and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. New York: Routledge.
19. Bohm, D.(1990). David Bohm: On dialogue. Ojai, CA: David Bohm Seminars.
20. Bradley S. Smith M.Community mediation: Reflections on a quarter century of practice Mediation Quarterly 17 (2000) 315-320doi:10.1002/crq.3890170403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/crq.3890170403
21. Browne, B.(1998). Imagine Chicago: A study in intergenerational appreciative inquiry. In S. A.Hammond & C.Royal (Eds.), Lessons from the field: Applying appreciative inquiry (pp. 76-89). Plano, TX: Practical Press.
22. Buber, M.(1958). I and thou (2nd ed.; R. G.Smith, Trans.). New York: Scribner.
23. Bush, R. A. B., & Folger, J. P.(1994). The promise of mediation: Responding to conflict through empowerment and recognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24. Callister R. R. Wall J. A.Jr.Thai and U.S. community mediation Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (2004) 573-598doi:10.1177/0022002704265947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002704265947
25. Campbell H. Marshall R.Public involvement and planning: Looking beyond the one to the many International Planning Studies 5 (2000) 321-344doi:10.1080/713672862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713672862
26. Chasin R. Herzig M. Roth S. Chasin L. Becker C. Stains R. R.Jr.From diatribe to dialogue on divisive public issues: Approaches drawn from family therapy Mediation Quarterly 13 (1996) 323-344doi:10.1002/crq.3900130408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/crq.3900130408
27. Cloke, K.(1994). Mediation: Revenge and the magic of forgiveness. Santa Monica, CA: Center for Dispute Resolution.
28. Cook, R. F., Roehl, J. A., & Sheppard, D. I.(1980). Neighborhood justice centers field test: Final evaluation report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
29. Cooke M.Five arguments for deliberative democracy Political Studies 48 (2000) 947-969doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00289
30. Cooperrider, D.(1998). Foreword: What is appreciative inquiry. In S. A.Hammond & C.Royal (Eds.), Lessons from the field: Applying appreciative inquiry (p. 3). Plano, TX: Practical Press.
31. Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D.(1999). Appreciative inquiry. San Francisco: Berrett Koehler.
32. Coote, A., & Lenaghan, J.(1997). Citizens’ juries: Theory into practice. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
33. Crosby, N. (1995). Citizens’ juries: One solution for difficult environmental questions. In O.Renn, T.Webler, & P.Wiedelmann (Eds.), Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse pp. 157-174. Boston: Kluwer Academic. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8_8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8_8-->
34. Daniels, S. E., & Walker, G. B. (2001). Working through environmental conflict: The collaborative learning approach. New York: Praeger.
35. Davis, A. (1986). Community mediation in Massachusetts: A decade of development, 1975-1986. Salem, MA: Administrative Office of the District Court.
36. Deetz, S. (1995). Transforming communication, transforming business. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
37. Delli Carpini M. X. Cook F. L. Jacobs L. R.Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature Annual Review of Political Science 7 2004 315-344doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630
38. Depoe, S. P., Delicath, J. W., & Elsenbeer, M. F. A. (2004). Communication and public participation in environmental decision making. Albany: State University of New York Press.
39. Docherty I. Goodlad R. Paddison R.Civic culture, community and citizen participation in contrasting neighborhoods Urban Studies 38 2001 2225-2250doi:10.1080/00420980120087144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00420980120087144
40. Domenici, K., & Littlejohn, S. W. (2001). Mediation: Empowerment in conflict management. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
41. Fishkin, J. (1995). The voice of the people. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42. Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43. Forester, J. (1993). Critical theory, public policy, and planning practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
44. Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
45. Foster, M. S. (1998). Imagine Dallas: Appreciative inquiry for a community. In S. A.Hammond & C.Royal (Eds.), Lessons from the field: Applying appreciative inquiry pp. 90-99. Plano, TX: Practical Press.
46. Gamson, W. A. (1968). Power and discontent. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
47. Gastil, J. (2000). By popular demand. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48. Gastil J. Deess E. P. Weiser P.Civic awakening in the jury room: A test of the connection between jury deliberation and political participation Journal of Politics 64 (2002) 585-595
49. Gastil J. Dillard J. P.The aims, methods, and effects of deliberative civic education through the National Issues Forums Communication Education 48 (1999a) 179-192doi:10.1080/03634529909379168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379168
50. Gastil J. Dillard J. P.Increasing political sophistication through public deliberation Political Communication 16 (1999b) 3-23doi:10.1080/105846099198749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/105846099198749
51. Golembiewski, R. T.(1998). Appreciating appreciative inquiry: Diagnosis and perspectives on how to do better. In W. A.Pasmore & R. W.Woodman (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 11, pp. 1-45). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
52. Gopalan P.The trust factor in participation and social education Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 554 (1997) 179-192
53. Greenberg M. Lewis J.Brownfield ment: A case study of an ethnically mixed neighborhood Urban Studies 37 (2000) 2501-2514doi:10.1080/00420980020080661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00420980020080661
54. Habermas, J.(1984). The theory of communicative action I: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon.
55. Hackman, J. R. (Ed.). (1990). Groups that work (and those that don’t.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
56. Halvorsen K. E.Assessing the effects of public participation Public Administration Review 63 (2003) 535-543doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00317
57. Hammond, S. A.(1998). The thin book of appreciative inquiry (2nd ed.). Plano, TX: Thin Book.
58. Hammond, S. A., & Royal, C.(1998). Lessons from the field: Applying appreciative inquiry. Plano, TX: Practical Press.
59. Harrison C. M. Munton R. J. C. Collins K.Experimental discursive spaces: Policy processes, public participation and the Greater London Authority Urban Studies 41 (2004) 903-917
60. Harrison, O.(1997). Open space technology: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
61. Healey P.The communicative turn in planning theory and its implication for spatial strategy formation Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design B 23 (1996) 207-234
62. Healey, P.(1997). Collaborative planning: Making frameworks in fragmented societies. London: Macmillan.
63. Hedeen T. Coy P. G.Community mediation and the court system: The ties that bind Mediation Quarterly 17 (2000) 351-367doi:10.1002/crq.3890170407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/crq.3890170407
64. Hirschman, A. O.(1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65. Isaacs, W.(1999). Dialogue and the art of thinking together. New York: Currency.
66. Isaacs W. N.Taking flight: Dialogue, collective thinking, and organizational learning Organizational Dynamics 22 (1993) 24-39doi:10.1016/0090-2616(93)90051-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616%2893%2990051-2
67. Janis, I.(1989). Crucial decisions. New York: Harper.
68. Jasinski J.Rhetoric and judgment in the constitutional ratification debate of 1787-1788: An exploration in the relationship between theory and critical practice Quarterly Journal of Speech 78 (1992) 197-218doi:10.1080/00335639209383989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335639209383989
69. Jasinski J.The feminization of liberty, domesticated virtue, and the reconstitution of power and authority in early American political discourse Quarterly Journal of Speech 79 (1993) 146-164doi:10.1080/00335639309384026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335639309384026
70. Kelm, J.(1998). Introducing the appreciative inquiry philosophy. In S. A.Hammond & C.Royal (Eds.), Lessons from the field: Applying appreciative inquiry (pp. 158-171). Plano, TX: Practical Press.
71. Laurian L.Public participation in decision making Journal of the American Planning Association 70 (2004) 53-65doi:10.1080/01944360408976338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976338
72. Lidskog R.From conflict to communication? Public participation and critical communication as a solution to siting conflicts in planning for hazardous waste Planning Practice & Research 12 (1997) 239-249doi:10.1080/02697459716482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02697459716482
73. Ludema, J. D.(2000). From deficit discourse to vocabularies of hope: The power of appreciation. In D. L.Cooperrider, P. F.Sorensen, Jr., D.Whitney, & T. F.Yaeger (Eds.), Appreciative inquiry: Rethinking human organization toward a positive theory of change (pp. 265-287). Champaign, IL: Stipes.
74. Ludema, J. D., Whitney, D., Mohr, B. J., & Griffin, T. J.(2003). The Appreciative Inquiry Summit. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
75. Ludema J. D. Wilmot T. R. Srivastva S.Organizational hope: Reaffirming the constructive task of social and organizational inquiry Human Relations 50 (1997) 1015-1052
76. Lyons W. E. Lowery D.The organization of political space and citizen responses to dissatisfaction in urban communities: An integrative model Journal of Politics 48 (1986) 321-346
77. Mathews, D.(1994). Politics for people: Finding a responsible public voice. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
78. Mathie A. Cunningham G.From clients to citizens: Asset-based community development as a strategy for community-driven development Development in Practice 13 (2003) 474-486doi:10.1080/0961452032000125857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0961452032000125857
79. McCoy M. L. Scully P. L.Deliberative dialogue to expand civic engagement: What kind of talk does democracy need? National Civic Review 91 (2002) 117-135doi:10.1002/ncr.91202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ncr.91202
80. McGillis, D.(1998). Resolving community conflict: The dispute settlement center of Durham, North Carolina. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
81. McKinney M. Harmon W.Public participation in environmental decision making: Is it working? National Civic Review 91 (2002) 149-170doi:10.1002/ncr.91204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ncr.91204
82. Mulcahy L.The devil and the deep blue sea? A critique of the ability of communication mediation to suppress and facilitate participation in civil life Journal of Law & Society 27 (2000) 133-150doi:10.1111/1467-6478.00149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00149
83. Murphy J. M.Civic republicanism in the modern age: Adlai Stevenson in the 1952 presidential campaign Quarterly Journal of Speech 80 (1994) 313-328doi:10.1080/00335639409384075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335639409384075
84. National Association for Community Mediation. (2005). Community mediation program statistics. Retrieved February 15, 2005, from http://www.nafcm.org/.
85. Owen, H.(1997). Open space technology: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
86. Pavlich G.The power of community mediation: Government and formation of self-identity Law & Society Review 30 (1996) 707-733doi:10.2307/3054115 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3054115
87. Pearce K. A. Pearce W. B.The Public Dialogue Consortium’s school wide dialogue process: A communication approach to develop citizenship skills and enhance school climate Communication Theory 11 (2001) 105-1231 doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00235.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00235.x-->
88. Pearce, W. B., & Littlejohn, S. W.(1997). Moral conflict. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
89. Pearce W. B. Pearce K. A.Combining passions and abilities: Toward dialogic virtuosity Southern Communication Journal 65 (2000) 161-175doi:10.1080/10417940009373165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10417940009373165
90. Pearce, W. B., & Pearce, K. A.(2004). Taking a communication perspective on dialogue. In R.Anderson, L. A.Baxter, & K. N.Cissna (Eds.), Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 39-56). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
91. Pinto, M., & Curran, M.(1998). The Laguna Beach Education Foundation, Schoolpower. In S. A.Hammond & C.Royal (Eds.), Lessons from the field: Applying appreciative inquiry (pp. 16-47). Plano, TX: Practical Press.
92. Powley E. H. Fry R. E. Barrett F. J. Bright D. S.Dialogic democracy meets command and control: Transformation through the Appreciative Inquiry Summit Academy of Management Executive 18 (2004) 67-80doi:10.5465/AME.2004.14776170 http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AME.2004.14776170
93. Ratliff J. N.The politics of nuclear waste: An analysis of a public hearing on the proposed Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository Communication Studies 48 (1997) 359-380doi:10.1080/10510979709368512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510979709368512
94. Renn, O., Webler, T., & Wiedemann, P. (Eds.). (1995). Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse. Boston: Kluwer. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8
95. Rogers R.Public participation in the 1970s channel tunnel debate part I: The defeat of a "traffic tunnel." Science & Culture 12 (2003) 189-237doi:10.1080/09505430309018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09505430309018
96. Rowe G. Frewer L. J.Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation Science, Technology, & Human Values 25 (2000) 3-29doi:10.1177/016224390002500101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101
97. Rowe G. Marsh R. Frewer L. J.Evaluation of a deliberative conference Science, Technology, & Values 29 (2004) 88-121doi:10.1177/0162243903259194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0162243903259194
98. Ryfe D. M.The practice of deliberative democracy: A study of 16 deliberative organizations Political Communication 19 (2002) 359-377doi:10.1080/01957470290055547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01957470290055547
99. Schon, D. A.(1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
100. Schon, D. A.(1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
101. Senge, P. M.(1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
102. Shonholtz R.Community mediation centers: Renewing the civic mission for the twenty-first century Mediation Quarterly 17 (2000) 331-340doi:10.1002/crq.3890170405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/crq.3890170405
103. Smith L. Vawda A.Citizen vs. customer: Different approaches to public participation in service delivery in Cape Town Urban Forum 14 (2003) 26-52doi:10.1007/s12132-003-0002-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12132-003-0002-0
104. Smith M.Diversity in community mediation: A conversation with Janice Tudy-Jackson and Roberto Chene Mediation Quarterly 17 (2000) 369-377doi:10.1002/crq.3890170408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/crq.3890170408-->
105. Smith P. D. McDonough M. H.Beyond public participation: Fairness in natural resource decision making Society & Natural Resources 14 (2001) 239-249doi:10.1080/089419201750111056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/089419201750111056
106. Spano, S.(2001). Public dialogue and participatory democracy: The Cupertino Community Project. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
107. Stewart, A. K., & Royal, C.(1998). Imagine South Carolina: A citizen’s summit and public dialogue. In S. A.Hammond & C.Royal (Eds.), Lessons from the field: Applying appreciative inquiry (pp. 100-111). Plano, TX: Practical Press.
108. Stewart, J., Zediker, K. E., & Black, L.(2004). Relationships among philosophies of dialogue. In R.Anderson, L. A.Baxter, & K. N.Cissna (Eds.), Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 21-38). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
109. Study Circles. (2005). Who we are. Retrieved February 15, 2005, from http://www.studycircles.org/pages/who.html.
110. Tabara D. Sauri D. Cerdan R.Forest fire risk management and public participation in changing socioenvironmental conditions: A case study in a Mediterranean region Risk Analysis 23 (2003) 249-260doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00305
111. Tan N.Community mediation in Singapore: Principles for community conflict resolution Conflict Resolution Quarterly 19 (2002) 289-301doi:10.1002/crq.3890190304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/crq.3890190304
112. Thoennes N. P. Salem P. Pearson J.Mediation and domestic violence: Current policies and practices Family and Conciliation Courts Review 33 (1995) 6-28doi:10.1111/j.174-1617.1995.tb00346.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.174-1617.1995.tb00346.x
113. Tuler S. Webler T.Voices from the forest: What participants expect of a public participation process Society & Natural Resources 12 (1999) 437-453
114. Tyler N.Practical experience of public participation: Evidence from methodological experiments Innovation 16 (2003) 253-270
115. Vari A.Public involvement in flood risk management in Hungary Journal of Risk Research 5 (2002) 211-224doi:10.1080/13669870110042606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669870110042606
116. Vasconcelos C. Hamilton A. Barrett P.Public participation in EIA: A study from a Portuguese perspective Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 2 (2000) 561-582
117. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E.(1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
118. Wall J. A. Jr., Stark J. B. Standifer R. L.Mediation: A current review and theory development Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (2001) 370-391doi:10.1177/0022002701045003006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002701045003006
119. Webler T. Tuler S.Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Theoretical reflections from a case study Administration and Society 32 (2000) 566-595doi:10.1177/00953990022019588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00953990022019588
120. Weick, K.(1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
121. Weinstein M.Community mediation: Providing justice and promoting transformation Conflict Resolution Quarterly 19 (2001) 251-259doi:10.1002/crq.3890190208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/crq.3890190208
122. Weisbord, M. R., & Janoff, S.(1995). Future search. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
123. Wenger, E.(1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
124. Winston D. W.Participation standards in mandatory mediation statutes: "You can lead a horse to water…" Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 11 (1996) 187-206
125. Wiseman V. Mooney G. Berry G. Tang K. C.Involving the general public in priority setting: Experience from Australia Social Science & Medicine 56 (2003) 1001-1012
126. Wittgenstein, L.(1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
127. Yankelovich, D.(1991). Coming to public judgment: Making democracy work in a complex world. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
128. Yankelovich, D.(1999). The magic of dialogue: Transforming conflict into cooperation. New York: Simon & Schuster.
129. Zemke R.Don’t fix that company! Maybe problem-solving is the problem Training 36 (1999) 26-33