Public participation in the 1970s channel tunnel debate part i: The defeat of a 'traffic tunnel'

Science as Culture

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 189-225

  Rogers, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956163017     PISSN: 09505431     EISSN: 14701189     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09505430309018     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Abel, D., 1961. Channel Underground, London:Pall Mall Press.
2. Achterhuis, H., 1993. “'Scarcity and sustainability'”. In Global Ecology, Edited by:Sachs, W., 104–116. London:Zed Books.
3. Adams, J., 'Can technology save us?'. paper for OECD Conference Towards Sustainable Transportation. March26, Vancouver.
4. Baldwin, J., 1996. Bucky Works, New York:Wiley.
5. Beder, S., 1996. The Nature of Sustainable Development, Newham:Scribe.
6. Bonavia, M., 1971. The Organisation of British Railways, London:Ian Alien.
7. Bonavia, M., 1987. The Channel Tunnel Story, Newton Abbot:David & Charles.
8. Braun, H.-J., 1992. 'Introduction. Failed innovations'. Social Studies of Science, 22(2):213–230.
9. British Railways Board. 1963. The Reshaping of British Railways, s.o. code no. 88-832 (two parts), London:HMSO.
10. Bromhead, P., 1973. The Great White Elephant of Maplin Sands:The Neglect of Comprehensive Transport Planning in Government Decision-making, London:Paul Elek.
11. Calder, N., 1986. The English Channel, Harmondsworth:Penguin.
12. Callanbach, E., 1975. Ecotopia, Berkeley:Banyan Tree Books.
13. Channel Tunnel Opposition Association. 1973a. The White Paper on the Channel Tunnel:A Reply by the Channel Tunnel Opposition Association, Folkestone:Channel Tunnel Opposition Association.
14. Channel Tunnel Study Group. 1962. Report, London:Channel Tunnel Company.
15. Channel Tunnel Study Group. 1964. The Channel Tunnel:The Facts, Northampton:Whitaker, Hunt & Co.
16. Channel Tunnel Study Working Party. April 1982. Final Report, Summary, April, Dover:Dover Harbour Board.
17. Darien-Smith, E., December 1995. Landscapes of Law, December, University of Chicago. Ph.D. Dissertation
18. Department of the Environment. 1973a. The Channel Tunnel Project, cmnd. 5256, London:HMSO, March.
19. Department of the Environment. 1973b. The Channel Tunnel, cmnd. 5430, London:HMSO. September
20. Department of the Environment. 1973c. The Channel Tunnel:A United Kingdom Transport Cost Benefit Study, London:HMSO.
21. Department of the Environment. 1975. The Channel Tunnel and Alternative Cross Channel Services, London:HMSO.
22. Dyos, HJ, and Aldcroft, D.H., 1974. British Transport:An Economic Survey from the Seventeenth Century to the Twentieth, Harmondsworth:Penguin.
23. Gomart, E., and Hajer, M., 2002. “'Is That Politics? For an inquiry into forms in contemporary polities'”. In Looking Back, Ahead--The 2002 Yearbook of the Sociology of the Sciences, Edited by:Joerges, B., Ezrahi, Y., and Nowotny, H., Dordrecht:Kluwer.
24. Grayson, R., 1996. 'The British Government, the Channel Tunnel and European unity, 1964-1984'. European History Quarterly, 26(3):415–436.
25. Grin, J., van de Graaf, H., and Hoppe, R., 1997. Technology Assessment through Interaction. A Guide, working document Rathenau Institute, W57 Den Haag:SDU.
26. Hajer, M., 1994. “'Ecological modernisation and social change'”. In Risk, Environment and Modernity:Towards a New Ecology, Edited by:Lash, S., Szerszynski, B., and Wynne, B., London:Sage.
27. Hajer, M., and Kesselring, S., 1999. 'Democracy in the risk society? Learning from the new politics of mobility in Munich'. Environmental Politics, 8(3):1–23.
28. Hansard. 2 February 1955. Parliamentary Debates, Series 5, col. 1234 2 February
29. Hansard. 9 February 1966. Parliamentary Debates, Series 5, col. 516 9 February
30. Hansard. 20 January 1975. Parliamentary Debates, Series 5, col. 1098-1126 20 January
31. Harvey, D., 1990. The Condition of Postmodemity, Oxford:Blackwell.
32. Holliday, I., Marcou, G., and Vickerman, R., 1991. The Channel Tunnel, London:Belhaven Press.
33. Jamison, A., ed. 1997. Public Participation and Sustainable Development:Compar-ing European Experiences, PESTO Papers, Aalborg:Aalborg University Press.
34. Jamison, A., ed. 1998. Technology Policy Meets the Public, Pesto Papers 2 Aalborg:Aalborg University Press.
35. Kwa, C., 1994. 'Modelling technologies of control'. Science as Culture, 4(3):20363–391.
36. Lee, D., 1973. 'Requiem for large-scale planning models'. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 39:117–142.
37. Lowe, P., and Goyder, J., 1983. Environmental Groups in Politics, London:George Alien & Unwin.
38. Lowe, P., Cox, G., 1986. Countryside Conflicts, Aldershot:Gowder.
39. Lowe, P., 1990. “'Technological change, farm management and pollution regulation'”. In Technological Change and the Rural Environment, Edited by:Lowe, P., Marsden, T., and Whatmore, S., 53–80. London:David Fulton.
40. Meadows, D. H., 1972. The Limits to Growth, London:Earth Island.
41. Ministry of Transport. September 1963a. Proposal for a Fixed Channel Link, cmnd. 2137, September, London:HMSO.
42. Ministry of Transport. 1963b. The Channel Tunnel Project, cmnd. 5256, London:HMSO.
43. Moch, J., 1962. Le Pont sur la Manche, Paris:Robert Laffont.
44. Moch, J., 1976. Une Si Longue Vie, Paris:Robert Laffont.
45. Mokhtarian, P., 1997. 'Now that travel can be virtual, will congestion virtually disappear?'. Scientific American, October:61
46. Moore, N. W., 1987. The Bird of Time, Cambridge:CUP.
47. Nelkin, D., ed. 1979. Controversy, Beverly Hills:Sage.
48. Nicholson, M., 1972. The Environmental Revolution, Harmondsworth:Pen- guin.
49. Nicholson, M., 1987. The New Environmental Age, Cambridge:CUP.
50. O'Riordan, T., 1976. Environmentalism, London:Pion.
51. Pepper, D., 1984. The Roots of Modern Environmentalism, Beckingham:Groom Helm.
52. Perrow, C., 1984. Normal Accidents, New York:Basic Books.
53. Railway Development Society. 1988. Fighting for Rail, 1978-1988, Leatherhead:Railway Development Society.
54. Rogers, R., 1995. 'Spotlight on the European Public Understanding of Science and Technology'. EASST Review, 14(4):21–23.
55. Rogers, R., 1998. 'Whither public participation in technology?'. EASST Review, 17(4):40–43.
56. Rougeron, C., 1961. 'The Channel dam'. The Engineer, 17 March
57. Rougeron, C., 1963. 'Channel Tunnel, bridge or dam?'. The Engineer, 15 February
58. Royal Society of Arts. 1973. The Channel Tunnel, A Public Discussion, London:RSA, September.
59. Sachs, W., 1998. “'Speed limits'”. In Speed:Visions of an Accelerated Age, Edited by:Millar, J., and Schwarz, M., 123–133. London:The Photographers' Gallery.
60. Schot, J., 1998. “'Constructive technology assessment comes of age'”. In Technology Policy Meets the Public, Pesto Papers 2 Edited by:Jamison, A., 207–231. AaI- borg:Aalborg University Press.
61. Schwarz, M., and Millar, J., 1998. “'Introduction:speed is a vehicle'”. In Speed:Visions of an Accelerated Age, Edited by:Millar, J., and Schwarz, M., London:The Photographers' Gallery.
62. Sclove, R., 1995. Technology and Democracy, New York:Guilford Press.
63. Slater, H., and Barnett, C., 1957. The Channel Tunnel, London:Allan Win- gate.
64. Solesbury, W., 1976. 'The environmental agenda'. Public Administration, 54 Winter
65. Wynne, B., 1975. 'The rhetoric of consensus politics:a critical review of technology assessment'. Research Policy, 4:108–158.
66. Yearley, S., 1991. The Green Case, London:HarperCollins.