Influence of knee positions on T2, T2 *, and dGEMRIC mapping in porcine knee cartilage

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 707-714

  Shiomi, Toshiyuki ^a   Nishii, Takashi ^a   Myoui, Akira ^a,b   Yoshikawa, Hideki ^a   Sugano, Nobuhiko ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

^b OSAKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

dGEMRIC; Knee cartilage; MRI

Indexed keywords

CARTILAGE; HYDROXYPROLINE; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

DGEMRIC; FEMORAL CARTILAGE; HYDROXYPROLINE CONTENT; KNEE FLEXIONS; MAGIC ANGLE EFFECTS; PROTEOGLYCANS; REGION OF INTEREST; WEIGHT BEARING AREA;

PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

GADOLINIUM; HYDROXYPROLINE; PROTEOGLYCAN;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CARTILAGE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMUR; IMAGE ANALYSIS; KNEE; KNEE FUNCTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITION; SWINE; TIBIA; WEIGHT BEARING;

EID: 77956361171     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22469     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Mosher TJ, Dardzinski BJ, Smith MB. Human articular cartilage: Influence of aging and early symptomatic degeneration on the spatial variation of T2-preliminary findings at 3 T. Radiology 2000;214: 259-266.
2. Dunn TC, Lu Y, Jin H, Ries MD, Majumdar S. T2 relaxation time of cartilage at MR imaging: comparison with severity of knee osteoarthritis. Radiology 2004;232:592-598.
3. * mapping of articular cartilage. Invest Radiol 2008;43:619-626.
4. 2 relaxation time and delayed gadolinium- enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) of human patellar cartilage at 1.5 T and 9.4 T: relationships with tissue mechanical properties. J Orthop Res 2006;24:366-374.
5. 2--enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) for clinical evaluation of articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:36-41.
6. 2 mapping of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee using 3T MRI. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007;15:789-797.
7. Scarvell JM, Smith PN, Refshauge KM, Galloway HR, Woods KR. Comparison of kinematic analysis by mapping tibiofemoral contact with movement of the femoral condylar centres in healthy and anterior cruciate ligament injured knees. J Orthop Res 2004;22:955-962.
8. Li G, Moses JM, Papannagari R, Pathare NP, DeFrate LE, Gill TJ. Anterior cruciate ligament deficiency alters the in vivo motion of the tibiofemoral cartilage contact points in both the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:1826-1834.
9. Gründer W, Kanowski M, Wagner M, Werner A. Visualization of pressure distribution within loaded joint cartilage by application of angle-sensitive NMR microscopy. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:884-891.
10. Liess C, Lüsse S, Karger N, Heller M, Glüer CC. Detection of changes in cartilage water content using MRI T2-mapping in vivo. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002;10:907-913.
11. Mosher TJ, Smith HE, Collins C, Liu Y, Hancy J, Dardzinski BJ, Smith MB. Change in knee cartilage T2 at MR imaging after running: a feasibility study. Radiology 2005;234:245-249.
12. Rubenstein JD, Kim JK, Morova-Protzner I, Stanchev PL, Henkelman RM. Effects of collagen orientation on MR imaging characteristics of bovine articular cartilage. Radiology 1993;188:219-226.
13. 2-. Magn Reson Imaging 2008;26:602-608.
14. Nieminen MT, Rieppo J, Silvennoinen J, Töyräs J, Hakumäki JM, Hyttinen MM, Helminen J, Jurvelin JS. Spatial assessment of articular cartilage proteoglycans with Gd-DTPA-enhanced T1 imaging. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:640-648.
15. Rieppo J, Hyttinen MM, Halmesmaki E, Ruotsalainen H, Vasara A, Kiviranta I, Jurvelin JS, Helminen HJ. Changes in spatial collagen content and collagen network architecture in porcine articular cartilage during growth and maturation. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009;17:448-455.
16. Xia Y. Magic-angle effect in magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage: A review. Invest Radiol 2000;35:602-621.
17. Bydder M, Rahal A, Fullerton GD, Bydder GM. The magic angle effect: a source of artifact, determinant of image contrast, and technique for imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:290-300.
18. Peto S, Gillis P. Fiber-to-field angle dependence of proton nuclear magnetic relaxation in collagen. Magn Reson Imaging 1990;8:705-712.
19. Xia Y. Relaxation anisotropy in cartilage by NMR microscopy (muMRI) at 14-microm resolution. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:941-949.
20. Goodwin DW, Zhu H, Dunn JF. In vitro MR imaging of hyaline cartilage: correlation with scanning electron microscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:405-409.
21. Mlynarik V, Degrassi A, Toffanin R, Vittur F, Cova M, Pozzi-Mucelli RS. Investigation of laminar appearance of articular cartilage by means of magnetic resonance microscopy. Magn Reson Imaging 1996;14:435-442.
22. Gründer W, Wagner M, Werner A. MR-microscopic visualization of anisotropic internal cartilage structures using the magic angle technique. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:376-382.
23. Mesfar W, Shirazi-Adl A. Computational biomechanics of knee joint in open kinetic chain extension exercises. Comp Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2008;11:55-61.
24. Kaufman JH, Regatte RR, Bolinger L, Kneeland JB, Reddy R, Leigh JS. A novel approach to observing articular cartilage deformation in vitro via magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9: 653-662.
25. Rubenstein JD, Kim JK, Henkelman RM. Effects of compression and recovery on bovine articular cartilage: appearance on MR images. Radiology 1996;201:843-850.
26. Wayne JS, Kraft KA, Shields KJ, Yin C, Owen JR, Disler DG. MR imaging of normal and matrix-depleted cartilage: correlation with biomechanical function and biochemical composition. Radiology 2003;228:493-499.
27. 2-mapping in vivo. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002;10:907-913.
28. 2 in response to mechanical loading. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:175-180.
29. 2 relaxation changes in articular cartilage with in situ mechanical loading of the knee. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:317-322.
30. 2 mapping of femoral cartilage: in vivo determination of the magic angle effect. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:665-669.
31. 2 relaxation in articular cartilage: a microscopic MRI (microMRI) study. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:460-469.
32. Bashir A, Gray ML, Hartke J, Burstein D. Nondestructive imaging of human cartilage glycosaminoglycan concentration by MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:857-865.
33. 2 assessment: differentiation of normal hyaline cartilage and reparative tissue after arthroscopic cartilage repair in equine subjects. Radiology 2006;241:407-414.
34. 2 relaxation time in the young adult knee cartilage at 1.5T. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009;17:1570-1575.
35. Kempson GE, Spivey CJ, Swanson SV, Freeman MR. Patterns of cartilage stiffness on normal and degenerate human femoral heads. J Biomech 1971;4:597-609.
36. Samosky JT, Burstein D, Grimson WE, Howe R, Martin S, Gray ML. Spatially-localized correlation of dGEMRIC-measured GAG distribution and mechanical stiffness in the human tibial plateau. J Orthop Res 2005;23:93-101.
37. Laouar L, Fishbein K, McGann LE, Horton WE, Spencer RG, Jomha NM. Cryopreservation of porcine articular cartilage: MRI and biochemical results after different freezing protocols. Cryobiology 2007; 54:36-43.
38. Kiraly K, Hyttinen MM, Lapveteläinen T, Elo M, Kiviranta I, Dobai J, Modis L, Helminen HJ, Arokoski PA. Specimen preparation and quantification of collagen birefringence in unstained sections of articular cartilage using image analysis and polarizing light microscopy. Histochem J 1997;29:317-327.